Change in coreboot[master]: cpu/x86/smm: Fix uintptr_t type mismatches in print statements

[Werner Zeh (Code Review)]

Attention is currently required from: Paul Menzel.
Werner Zeh has posted comments on this change. ( https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/54341 )

Change subject: cpu/x86/smm: Fix uintptr_t type mismatches in print statements
......................................................................

Patch Set 1:

(1 comment)

Patchset:

PS1:
> I think the problem is, that’s it’s dependent on the host build system, how uintptr_t is defined.

Isn't this target code which we are looking at? If yes, it is compiled with the cross-gcc coreboot provides with a well-defined context. How does the host-gcc act here?