Paul Menzel has posted comments on this change. ( https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/58055 )
Change subject: util/cbfstool: Add support for ARM64 UefiPayload ......................................................................
Patch Set 9:
(2 comments)
Commit Message:
https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/58055/comment/8936754f_0e8e7c0c PS8, Line 10: ARM SystemReady Yes, thank you. Next time, it’d be great, if you could update the commit message. The URL you linked requires the reader to go through several marketing documents. Also not all “bands” seem to require that. From page 13 from the whitepaper:
4.3 Base Boot Requirements The Base Boot Requirements (BBR) document specifies firmware interface requirements that system software, like operating systems and hypervisors, can rely on. Firmware interface requirements include the following specifications:
• UEFI specification • ACPI specification • SMBIOS specification
Other Arm specifications, for example PSCI and SMCCC The BBR also provides recipes – a recipe meaning a set of requirements – that are tailored to the various generic operating systems:
Patchset:
PS9: On what board did you actually use TianoCore now, and did you run some verification suite for ARM SystemReady?