Change in coreboot[master]: drivers/fsp2_0: drop support for FSP-T

[Subrata Banik (Code Review)]

Subrata Banik has posted comments on this change. ( https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/36622 )

Change subject: drivers/fsp2_0: drop support for FSP-T
......................................................................

Patch Set 4:
> Patch Set 4:
> > Patch Set 4:
> > > Patch Set 4:
> > > > Patch Set 4:
> > > > > Patch Set 4: Code-Review-1
> > > > >
> > > > > FSP-T already set as optional. Some of our customers are using FSP-T, it has to be there.
> > > >
> > > > Could you please state why? What does FSP-T do that coreboot cannot?
> > >
> > > I understand the concern Arthur.
> > >
> > > There are some customer who still like to make use of FSP-T due to various reason.
> > > native CAR implementation majorly focusing on NEM enhance
> > > Some customers like to use FSP-T with intel boot guard solution, where else native CAR what we implemented is not applicable with bootguard
> >
> > Can you give more details on that NEM part, please?

here you go
https://software.intel.com/en-us/articles/introduction-to-cache-allocation-t...
> > On 2: is there any chance, Intel can release more details here so we can (maybe) add support for it?

i think there are some effort in past to enable bootguard support. let me search those old CL here in cb.org
> @Subrata ping