Kyösti Mälkki has posted comments on this change. ( https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/37721 )
Change subject: soc/amd/common: Correct SPI FIFO size check
......................................................................
Patch Set 1: Code-Review-2
Patch Set 1: Code-Review+2
Patch Set 1: Code-Review-1
Ideally amd/block/spi would work with hudson too.
Why would soc/amd code apply to southbridge/amd chips? Isn't it ok to draw a line and say that the soc blocks will only support chips in the soc directory?
My -1 is because of not using the introduced to SPI subsystem that tells command byte will not consume FIFO. Giving this -2 and hoping Furquan will comment as he probably nows the reasoning best why the flag was added.
--
To view, visit
https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/37721
To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit
https://review.coreboot.org/settings
Gerrit-Project: coreboot
Gerrit-Branch: master
Gerrit-Change-Id: Ica2ca514deea401c9c5396913087e07a12ab3cf3
Gerrit-Change-Number: 37721
Gerrit-PatchSet: 1
Gerrit-Owner: Marshall Dawson
marshalldawson3rd@gmail.com
Gerrit-Reviewer: Eric Peers
epeers@google.com
Gerrit-Reviewer: Frans Hendriks
fhendriks@eltan.com
Gerrit-Reviewer: Furquan Shaikh
furquan@google.com
Gerrit-Reviewer: Kyösti Mälkki
kyosti.malkki@gmail.com
Gerrit-Reviewer: Marshall Dawson
marshalldawson3rd@gmail.com
Gerrit-Reviewer: Martin Roth
martinroth@google.com
Gerrit-Reviewer: Raul Rangel
rrangel@chromium.org
Gerrit-Reviewer: build bot (Jenkins)
no-reply@coreboot.org
Gerrit-CC: Michał Żygowski
michal.zygowski@3mdeb.com
Gerrit-CC: Paul Menzel
paulepanter@users.sourceforge.net
Gerrit-Comment-Date: Tue, 24 Dec 2019 01:53:26 +0000
Gerrit-HasComments: No
Gerrit-Has-Labels: Yes
Gerrit-MessageType: comment