Patch Set 1: Code-Review+2
Patch Set 1: Code-Review-1
Ideally amd/block/spi would work with hudson too.
Why would soc/amd code apply to southbridge/amd chips? Isn't it ok to draw a line and say that the soc blocks will only support chips in the soc directory?

My -1 is because of not using the introduced to SPI subsystem that tells command byte will not consume FIFO. Giving this -2 and hoping Furquan will comment as he probably nows the reasoning best why the flag was added.

Patch set 1:Code-Review -2

To view, visit change 37721. To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit settings.