Felix Held has posted comments on this change. ( https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/69303 )
Change subject: mb/*: Remove lapic from devicetree
......................................................................
Patch Set 18:
(1 comment)
Patchset:
PS18:
> I get this on Apollo Lake based boards: […]
CB:72599 should have fixed this problem
--
To view, visit https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/69303
To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit https://review.coreboot.org/settings
Gerrit-Project: coreboot
Gerrit-Branch: master
Gerrit-Change-Id: I5258a769c0f0ee4bbc4facc19737eed187b68c73
Gerrit-Change-Number: 69303
Gerrit-PatchSet: 18
Gerrit-Owner: Arthur Heymans <arthur(a)aheymans.xyz>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Angel Pons <th3fanbus(a)gmail.com>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Arthur Heymans <arthur(a)aheymans.xyz>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Christian Walter <christian.walter(a)9elements.com>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Elyes Haouas <ehaouas(a)noos.fr>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Erik van den Bogaert <ebogaert(a)eltan.com>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Felix Singer <felixsinger(a)posteo.net>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Frans Hendriks <fhendriks(a)eltan.com>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Jeremy Soller <jeremy(a)system76.com>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Johnny Lin <Johnny_Lin(a)wiwynn.com>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Jonathan Zhang <jonzhang(a)fb.com>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Jonathon Hall <jonathon.hall(a)puri.sm>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Kyösti Mälkki <kyosti.malkki(a)gmail.com>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Maxim Polyakov <max.senia.poliak(a)gmail.com>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Michael Niewöhner <foss(a)mniewoehner.de>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Michał Żygowski <michal.zygowski(a)3mdeb.com>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Morgan Jang <Morgan_Jang(a)wiwynn.com>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Nico Huber <nico.h(a)gmx.de>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Patrick Rudolph <patrick.rudolph(a)9elements.com>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Piotr Król <piotr.krol(a)3mdeb.com>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Sean Rhodes <sean(a)starlabs.systems>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Tarun Tuli <taruntuli(a)google.com>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Tim Chu <Tim.Chu(a)quantatw.com>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Tim Crawford <tcrawford(a)system76.com>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Werner Zeh <werner.zeh(a)siemens.com>
Gerrit-Reviewer: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply(a)coreboot.org>
Gerrit-CC: 9elements QA <hardwaretestrobot(a)gmail.com>
Gerrit-CC: Arthur Heymans <arthur.heymans(a)9elements.com>
Gerrit-CC: Felix Held <felix-coreboot(a)felixheld.de>
Gerrit-CC: Martin L Roth <gaumless(a)gmail.com>
Gerrit-Comment-Date: Wed, 01 Feb 2023 00:15:14 +0000
Gerrit-HasComments: Yes
Gerrit-Has-Labels: No
Comment-In-Reply-To: Werner Zeh <werner.zeh(a)siemens.com>
Gerrit-MessageType: comment
Attention is currently required from: Robert Zieba, Tarun Tuli, Subrata Banik, Caveh Jalali, Kapil Porwal, Nick Vaccaro, Boris Mittelberg.
Prashant Malani has posted comments on this change. ( https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/72370 )
Change subject: ec/google/chromeec: Add handles for ori, usb role switch
......................................................................
Patch Set 4:
(1 comment)
File src/ec/google/chromeec/ec_acpi.c:
https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/72370/comment/0eaa210b_7343c867
PS3, Line 195: .orientation_switch = config->ori_conn[i],
: .usb_role_switch = config->usb_role_conn[i],
> could you add the skyrim case as the next patch so we have some insight
into what's coming up? i didn't see anything interesting USB related
in the existing skyrim device tree.
Sure. I can add a CL to the stack. It's still under development, so we don't want to enable it yet.
> sounds like part of the problem is that you can't disable
orientation_switch or usb_role_switch by just explicitly setting
them to NULL in the device tree since that's indistinguishable from not
being present. would it make sense to introduce explicit
no_orientation_switch , no_usb_role_switch parameters to the
device tree?
fill_ssdt_typec_device() will have to check for those.
I guess? I dunno, that seems like too many tags to be worth the trouble:
- For Intel case: just define mux_conn.
- For AMD case: define mux_conn but define no_usb_role_switch and no_orientation_switch
- For potential use case where there is a mode-switch, and role/orientation-switch, but the two are distinct: define mux_conn, *and* define usb_role/orientation_switch
That seems like overcomplicating things (as opposed to just always being explicit about the aliases). Then again, IANA-Coreboot expert, so if the other folks reviewing are OK with the "no_*" option, I don't mind adopting that approach.
--
To view, visit https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/72370
To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit https://review.coreboot.org/settings
Gerrit-Project: coreboot
Gerrit-Branch: master
Gerrit-Change-Id: I0f5dff865db765693cde63a23173b215b20b6c02
Gerrit-Change-Number: 72370
Gerrit-PatchSet: 4
Gerrit-Owner: Prashant Malani <pmalani(a)chromium.org>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Boris Mittelberg <bmbm(a)google.com>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Caveh Jalali <caveh(a)chromium.org>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Kapil Porwal <kapilporwal(a)google.com>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Nick Vaccaro <nvaccaro(a)chromium.org>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Nick Vaccaro <nvaccaro(a)google.com>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Robert Zieba <robertzieba(a)google.com>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Subrata Banik <subratabanik(a)google.com>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Tarun Tuli <taruntuli(a)google.com>
Gerrit-Reviewer: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply(a)coreboot.org>
Gerrit-Attention: Robert Zieba <robertzieba(a)google.com>
Gerrit-Attention: Tarun Tuli <taruntuli(a)google.com>
Gerrit-Attention: Subrata Banik <subratabanik(a)google.com>
Gerrit-Attention: Caveh Jalali <caveh(a)chromium.org>
Gerrit-Attention: Kapil Porwal <kapilporwal(a)google.com>
Gerrit-Attention: Nick Vaccaro <nvaccaro(a)chromium.org>
Gerrit-Attention: Nick Vaccaro <nvaccaro(a)google.com>
Gerrit-Attention: Boris Mittelberg <bmbm(a)google.com>
Gerrit-Comment-Date: Wed, 01 Feb 2023 00:09:42 +0000
Gerrit-HasComments: Yes
Gerrit-Has-Labels: No
Comment-In-Reply-To: Robert Zieba <robertzieba(a)google.com>
Comment-In-Reply-To: Caveh Jalali <caveh(a)chromium.org>
Comment-In-Reply-To: Prashant Malani <pmalani(a)chromium.org>
Gerrit-MessageType: comment