Nico Huber has posted comments on this change. ( https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/36328 )
Change subject: [RFC] Documentation/fsp: Discuss FSP-S issues ......................................................................
Patch Set 2:
(2 comments)
https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/36328/2/Documentation/fsp/fsp-s_dis... File Documentation/fsp/fsp-s_discussion.md:
https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/36328/2/Documentation/fsp/fsp-s_dis... PS2, Line 173: FSP Creates Legal Uncertainty
Where do you see any speculation?
David, I don't quite follow. How is "uncertainty" speculation. Are we certain about anything?
Can you help me find the right words to express that we aren't sure one can ship coreboot+FSP without applying the GPL's copyleft to FSP (and without violating coreboot author's copyright ofc). Or in other words, how to tell Intel that we are afraid to sell their HW/SW.
https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/36328/2/Documentation/fsp/fsp-s_dis... PS2, Line 204: The few lines of code in FSP-S that help to get a : mainboard running, don't outweigh the damage it does. However, one : can't have the cherries without taking the whole menu, which takes : years to digest.
Too much editorializing IMO
Yeah, let's scratch that.