Attention is currently required from: Christian Walter, Jincheng Li, Jérémy Compostella, Patrick Rudolph, Subrata Banik, Uwe Poeche, yuchi.chen@intel.com.
Angel Pons has posted comments on this change by Patrick Rudolph. ( https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/85568?usp=email )
The change is no longer submittable: All-Comments-Resolved is unsatisfied now.
Change subject: cpu/intel/car/romstage: Fix false-positive stack corruption ......................................................................
Patch Set 3: Code-Review+2
(3 comments)
File src/cpu/intel/car/romstage.c:
https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/85568/comment/5c8badf4_0a2a553a?usp... : PS3, Line 45: behviour typo:
```suggestion * (and thus hard to debug) behaviour. ```
https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/85568/comment/da8f0a6d_40f8b5b3?usp... : PS3, Line 47: serve typo?
```suggestion * severe and allowed romstage to run. It's useful to detect problems when ```
https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/85568/comment/92343a72_e78ada0a?usp... : PS3, Line 50: * When HW breakpoints are used and enabled the stack canary breakpoint will : * report the instruction pointer immediately and thus gives hint which function : * does use too much stack. FSP might disable HW breakpoints though. nit: some grammar fixes and a bit of rewording
```suggestion * When HW breakpoints are used and enabled, the stack canary breakpoint will * reports the instruction pointer immediately, which can hint at which function * may be using too much stack. FSP might disable HW breakpoints, though. ```