Mike Banon has posted comments on this change. ( https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/37750 )
Change subject: mb/jetway/nf81-t56n-lf: Switch away from ROMCC_BOOTBLOCK ......................................................................
Patch Set 7:
Patch Set 5:
Patch Set 5:
Patch Set 3: Code-Review+1
Maybe it's better to include the fixes of Kconfig and Kconfig.name to this change, in case this board's owner doesn't come in time before Dec 31 and we need it to be merged urgently. I've done it this way in CB:37869 with Gizmo2.
Done. for the other boards, Please feel free to edit my changes here: https://review.coreboot.org/q/owner:ehaouas%2540noos.fr+status:open+Switch+a...
All done! Searching by "#select ROMCC_BOOTBLOCK", it seems the remaining boards are
./src/mainboard/bap/ode_e21XX ./src/mainboard/bap/ode_e20XX ./src/mainboard/hp/abm ./src/mainboard/amd/olivehillplus ./src/mainboard/amd/olivehill ./src/mainboard/amd/lamar ./src/mainboard/amd/db-ft3b-lc ./src/mainboard/amd/bettong
and maybe ./src/mainboard/elmex/pcm205401 although it doesn't contain this for some reason, unlike pcm205400 already done by you (also need to check, some Kconfig have a stuff like config ELMEX_BOARDS_DISABLED - bool "Boards from vendor are disabled").
I plan to do all this before the Dec 31 - since we've started saving these rare boards, it's better to save them all
These remaining-with-ROMCC rare boards seem to be broken: even if switched away from ROMCC_BOOTBLOCK, their builds are failing because of the other reasons (unrelated to new bootblock.c file). I am abandoning their "switch away from ROMCC_BOOTBLOCK" changes (CB:37975 - CB:37982), but if anyone cares about these boards - they can restore these changes and advance.