Kyösti Mälkki has posted comments on this change. ( https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/19273 )
Change subject: [NOTFORMERGE]: Squashed away from BINARYPI_LEGACY_WRAPPER ......................................................................
Patch Set 6:
Patch Set 6:
@Kyösti Mälkki why was this abandoned?
It was NOTFORMERGE in the first place and I only had pushed that for the purpose of build testing as a proof-of-concept to show how ill all agesawrapper.c code and vendorcode/pi/AGESA.c is.
I have lots of unpublished and/or rebased code for binaryPI, but with nobody doing even the simple reviews I have pushed so far on binaryPI, the work is essentially stalled in the status it had 2017. The evolution to POSCAR_STAGE and C_ENV_BOOTBLOCK and VBOOT are all somewhat problematic for binaryPI.
I was hoping AMD / Silverback and connection with Chromebooks would have improved the older binaryPI side but I got over-frustrated with and lost most of the interest on architectural work on the topic. I put a lot of my own time on stoneyridge reviews, and that was a completely lost investment from my perspective.