Alexandru Gagniuc (mr.nuke.me@gmail.com) just uploaded a new patch set to gerrit, which you can find at http://review.coreboot.org/5501
-gerrit
commit 4178eb1ecd646092011de88bcf822fe9258a67b5 Author: Alexandru Gagniuc mr.nuke.me@gmail.com Date: Tue Apr 15 15:41:38 2014 -0500
cpu/amd/agesa/family15tn: Add udelay implementation for SMM
This is a small implementation which uses only MSRs and rdtsc, without relying on northbridge or other system hardware. It's SMM safe in that it only reads registers, and doesn't modigy the state of the hardware.
Change-Id: Ifa02ca73455b382f830c9b30b80b4f1bb18706b4 Signed-off-by: Alexandru Gagniuc mr.nuke.me@gmail.com --- src/cpu/amd/agesa/family15tn/Makefile.inc | 2 ++ src/cpu/amd/agesa/family15tn/udelay.c | 49 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 2 files changed, 51 insertions(+)
diff --git a/src/cpu/amd/agesa/family15tn/Makefile.inc b/src/cpu/amd/agesa/family15tn/Makefile.inc index 19a2f0f..a8f644d 100644 --- a/src/cpu/amd/agesa/family15tn/Makefile.inc +++ b/src/cpu/amd/agesa/family15tn/Makefile.inc @@ -20,6 +20,8 @@ ramstage-y += chip_name.c ramstage-y += model_15_init.c
+smm-$(CONFIG_HAVE_SMI_HANDLER) += udelay.c + subdirs-y += ../../mtrr subdirs-y += ../../smm subdirs-y += ../../../x86/tsc diff --git a/src/cpu/amd/agesa/family15tn/udelay.c b/src/cpu/amd/agesa/family15tn/udelay.c new file mode 100644 index 0000000..7278fad --- /dev/null +++ b/src/cpu/amd/agesa/family15tn/udelay.c @@ -0,0 +1,49 @@ +/* + * udelay() impementation for SMI handlers + * This is neat in that it never writes to hardware registers, and thus does not + * modify the state of the hardware while servicing SMIs. + * + * Copyright (C) 2014 Alexandru Gagniuc mr.nuke.me@gmail.com + * Subject to the GNU GPL v2, or (at your option) any later version. + */ + +#include <delay.h> +#include <stdint.h> +#include <cpu/x86/tsc.h> +#include <cpu/x86/msr.h> +#include <console/console.h> + +void udelay(uint32_t us) +{ + uint8_t fid, did, pstate_idx; + uint64_t tsc_clock, tsc_start, tsc_end, tsc_now; + msr_t msr; + const uint64_t tsc_base = 100000000; + + /* Get initial timestamp before we do the math */ + tsc_start = rdtscll(); + + /* Get the P-state. This determines which MSR to read */ + msr = rdmsr(0xc0010063); + pstate_idx = msr.lo & 0x07; + + /* Get FID and VID for current P-State */ + msr = rdmsr(0xc0010064 + pstate_idx); + + /* Extract the FID and VID values */ + fid = msr.lo & 0x3f; + did = (msr.lo >> 6) & 0x7; + + /* Calculate the CPU clock (from base freq of 100MHz) */ + tsc_clock = tsc_base * (fid + 0x10) / (1 << did); + + /* + * No worries about overflow. Even at 10GHz, we have over 55 years + * before the TSC overflows. + */ + tsc_end = tsc_start + ((tsc_clock / 1000000) * us); + + do { + tsc_now = rdtscll(); + } while (tsc_now < tsc_end); +}