Edward O'Callaghan has submitted this change. ( https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/37947 )
Change subject: ec/google/chromeec: ignore LIMIT_POWER based on command code in response ......................................................................
ec/google/chromeec: ignore LIMIT_POWER based on command code in response
Assume that LIMIT_POWER is not requested if the ec does not support it. Do this by checking the command code in the response message instead of return value.
BUG=b:146165519 BRANCH=None TEST=Boot puff with EC which does not support LIMIT_POWER param.
Change-Id: Ib2f5f69a53f204acebfab3e36aab2960eeec1204 Signed-off-by: Rizwan Qureshi rizwan.qureshi@intel.com Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/37947 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) no-reply@coreboot.org Reviewed-by: Edward O'Callaghan quasisec@chromium.org --- M src/ec/google/chromeec/ec.c 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
Approvals: build bot (Jenkins): Verified Edward O'Callaghan: Looks good to me, approved
diff --git a/src/ec/google/chromeec/ec.c b/src/ec/google/chromeec/ec.c index de43eb5..b6020a3 100644 --- a/src/ec/google/chromeec/ec.c +++ b/src/ec/google/chromeec/ec.c @@ -760,14 +760,19 @@ int rv;
rv = google_chromeec_command(&cmd); - if (rv == -EC_RES_INVALID_PARAM || rv == -EC_RES_INVALID_COMMAND) { + + if (rv != 0 && (cmd.cmd_code == EC_RES_INVALID_COMMAND || + cmd.cmd_code == EC_RES_INVALID_PARAM)) { printk(BIOS_INFO, "PARAM_LIMIT_POWER not supported by EC.\n"); *limit_power = 0; return 0; + } else if (rv != 0) { + return -1; }
*limit_power = resp.get_param.value; - return rv; + + return 0; }
int google_chromeec_get_protocol_info(