Felix Singer has submitted this change. ( https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/85683?usp=email )
Change subject: docs: Add 24.12 release notes ......................................................................
docs: Add 24.12 release notes
Also drop the 24.11 release notes template.
Change-Id: Ifeb88a1bb4f05183ac9274de9b26970b6155017d Signed-off-by: Felix Singer felixsinger@posteo.net Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/85683 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) no-reply@coreboot.org Reviewed-by: Matt DeVillier matt.devillier@gmail.com --- D Documentation/releases/coreboot-24.11-relnotes.md A Documentation/releases/coreboot-24.12-relnotes.md M Documentation/releases/index.md 3 files changed, 338 insertions(+), 100 deletions(-)
Approvals: Matt DeVillier: Looks good to me, approved build bot (Jenkins): Verified
diff --git a/Documentation/releases/coreboot-24.11-relnotes.md b/Documentation/releases/coreboot-24.11-relnotes.md deleted file mode 100644 index 9ff9036..0000000 --- a/Documentation/releases/coreboot-24.11-relnotes.md +++ /dev/null @@ -1,99 +0,0 @@ -Upcoming release - coreboot 24.11 -======================================================================== - -The 24.11 release is scheduled for Mid November, 2024 - - -Update this document with changes that should be in the release notes. - -* Please use Markdown. -* See the past few release notes for the general format. -* The chip and board additions and removals will be updated right - before the release, so those do not need to be added. -* Note that all changes before the release are done are marked upcoming. - A final version of the notes are done after the release. - - - -Significant or interesting changes ----------------------------------- - -* Add changes that need a full description here - -* This section should have full descriptions and can or should have - a link to the referenced commits. - - - -Additional coreboot changes ---------------------------- - -The following are changes across a number of patches, or changes worth -noting, but not needing a full description. - -* Changes that only need a line or two of description go here. - - - -Changes to external resources ------------------------------ - -### Toolchain updates - -* Upgrade binutils from 2.42 to 2.43.1 -* Upgrade GCC from 14.1.0 to 14.2.0 -* Upgrade CMake from 3.29.3 to 3.30.2 -* Upgrade LLVM from 18.1.6 to 18.1.8 - -### Git submodule pointers - - -### External payloads - - - -Platform Updates ----------------- - -### Added mainboards: -* To be filled in immediately before the release by the release team - - -### Removed Mainboards -* To be filled in immediately before the release by the release team - - -### Updated SoCs -* To be filled in immediately before the release by the release team - - - -Plans to move platform support to a branch ------------------------------------------- -* To be filled in immediately before the release by the release team - - - -Statistics from the 24.08 to the 24.11 release --------------------------------------------- -* To be filled in immediately before the release by the release team - - - -Significant Known and Open Issues ---------------------------------- - -Issues from the coreboot bugtracker: https://ticket.coreboot.org/ -* To be filled in immediately before the release by the release team - - - -coreboot Links and Contact Information --------------------------------------- - -* Main Web site: https://www.coreboot.org -* Downloads: https://coreboot.org/downloads.html -* Source control: https://review.coreboot.org -* Documentation: https://doc.coreboot.org -* Issue tracker: https://ticket.coreboot.org/projects/coreboot -* Donations: https://coreboot.org/donate.html diff --git a/Documentation/releases/coreboot-24.12-relnotes.md b/Documentation/releases/coreboot-24.12-relnotes.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000..51a581f --- /dev/null +++ b/Documentation/releases/coreboot-24.12-relnotes.md @@ -0,0 +1,337 @@ +Upcoming release - coreboot 24.12 +================================= + +We are pleased to announce the release of coreboot 24.12, another significant +milestone in our ongoing commitment to delivering open-source firmware +solutions. This release includes 970 commits, contributed by 126 dedicated +individuals from our global community. The updates in 24.12 bring +various enhancements, optimizations, and new features that further improve the +reliability and performance of coreboot across supported platforms. + +We extend our sincere thanks to the patch authors, reviewers, and everyone +involved in the coreboot community for their hard work and dedication. Your +contributions continue to advance and refine coreboot with each release. As +always, thank you for your support and collaboration in driving the future of +open-source firmware. + +The next coreboot release, 25.03, is planned for mid March. + +Significant or interesting changes +---------------------------------- + +### drivers/option: Add forms in cbtables + +Introduce a mechanism so that coreboot can provide a list of options to +post-coreboot code. The options are grouped together into forms and +have a meaning name and optional help text. This can be used to let +payloads know which options should be displayed in a setup menu, +for instance. Although this system was written to be used with edk2, +it has been designed with flexibility in mind so that other payloads +can also make use of this mechanism. The system currently lacks a way +to describe where to find option values. + +This information is stored in a set of data structures specifically +created for this purpose. This format is known as CFR, which means +"coreboot forms representation" or "cursed forms representation". +Although the "forms representation" is borrowed from UEFI, CFR can +be used in non-UEFI scenarios as well. + +The data structures are implemented as an extension of cbtables records +to support nesting. It should not break backwards compatibility because +the CFR root record (LB_TAG_CFR_ROOT) size includes all of its children +records. The concept of record nesting is borrowed from the records for +CMOS options. It is not possible to reuse the CMOS records because they +are too closely coupled with CMOS options; using these structures would +needlessly restrict more capable backends to what can be done with CMOS +options, which is undesired. + +Because CFR supports variable-length components, directly transforming +options into CFR structures is not a trivial process. Furthermore, CFR +structures need to be written in one go. Because of this, abstractions +exist to generate CFR structures from a set of "setup menu" structures +that are coreboot-specific and could be integrated with the devicetree +at some point. Note that `struct sm_object` is a tagged union. This is +used to have lists of options in an array, as building linked lists of +options at runtime is extremely impractical because options would have +to be added at the end of the linked list to maintain option order. To +avoid mistakes defining `struct sm_object` values, helper macros exist +for supported option types. The macros also provide some type checking +as they initialise specific union members. + +It should be possible to extend CFR support for more sophisticated +options like fan curve points. + + +### Makefile.mk: Skip unnecessary recompiles when static.{c,h} are updated + +The generated static.c file output by sconfig is currently added as a +prerequisite for all objects to ensure that static.h exists before +compiling anything that might need it. However, this forces every single +object out of date when the compiled devicetree is updated, even though +not every file actually needs static.h. + +Only static.h actually needs to exist before compilation of other +objects, since static.c is an independent compilation unit that doesn't +need to exist before other objects can be built. Thus, change the +prerequisite from static.c to static.h, and add a rule for static.h that +depends on static.c. The recipe is a simple `true` since sconfig +generates static.c and static.h at the same time. To prevent unnecessary +recompiles, make static.h an order-only prerequisite [1] using the new +generated files argument for create_cc_template to ensure that the +header exists before any object might need it, but without forcing a +recompile of all objects by default whenever it is updated. + +On a clean build, all objects will be compiled since they do not exist, +and these will occur after static.h is generated due to the default +order-only prerequisite. On subsequent incremental compiles, sources +that do need static.h will be appropriately marked out of date due to +the generated .d dependency files from the compiler, which list static.h +as a normal prerequisite for each objects that do include it, which +overrides the default order-only prerequisite. The dependency files +generated for all other objects will not include static.h, and thus the +objects will not be updated since the default order-only dependency does +not force them out of date. + +After updating the devicetree of qemu-i440fx after a clean build, +comparing the build log with `make --debug=why` with the generated +dependency files indicates that only objects that actually depend on +static.h were rebuilt, instead of every object. Running a timeless +incremental build after making a change in the devicetree yielded +identical roms when performed with this patch and main, with the only +difference being the number of objects that needed to be rebuilt. Also +tested with the E6430. + +[1] https://www.gnu.org/software/make/manual/html_node/Prerequisite-Types.html + + +### sconfig: Move config_of_soc from device.h to static.h + +Many sources include device.h and thus static.h, but many only need the +function declarations and type definitions, not the compiled devicetree +from sconfig. This causes many unnecessary recompiles whenever the +devicetree is updated due to the dependency. Address this by moving the +config_of_soc macro directly into the generated static.h header, as it +seems to be the only line in device.h that actually requires static.h. +For now, static.h remains included in device.h so that the build is not +affected. Subsequent commits will include static.h directly into sources +that actually need it, after which it can be dropped from device.h. + +Some statistics for C objects: + +Dell Latitude E6400 (GM45/ICH9): +669 total objects +181 depend on static.h +2 require static.h + +Dell Latitude E6430 (Ivy Bridge/Panther Point): +693 total objects +199 depend on static.h +3 require static.h + +Lenovo ThinkCentre M700 / M900 Tiny (Kaby Lake): +794 total objects +298 depend on static.h +23 objects require static.h + +MSI PRO Z690-A (WIFI) DDR4 (Alder Lake): +959 total objects +319 depend on static.h +25 require static.h + +The number of objects was determined by grepping the build log for +calls to CC, the number of objects that depend on static.h was +determined by grepping for calls to CC after touching static.h, and the +number of objects that actually require the static.h related lines from +device.h was determined by grepping for objects that failed to build +after removing the static.h lines from device.h and running make with +the --keep-going flag. + + +### Makefile: Fix no-op incremental build + +If make is ran a second time after an initial clean compile, the entire +rom will be rebuilt. Subsequent calls to make will not rebuild the rom. +This initial rebuild was due to build/util/kconfig/conf being newer than +config.h, and the subsequent rebuild of the header marked everything +else as out of date. The reason conf was newer than config.h is because +it was being treated as an intermediate file [1]. In the rule for +config.h, conf is a prerequisite, but since it is treated as an +intermediate, its rule will not be run if config.h exists and all the +prerequisites of conf (i.e. its source files) are also up to date. + +On a clean build after a make menuconfig, config.h exists, satisfying +these conditions. In this case, config.h is treated as being up to date +even though conf does not exist. However, if another target does not +exist and also has conf as a prerequisite, conf will then be built so +that the target can be built. This caused conf to be newer than +config.h, but by default GNU Make deletes intermediate files after a +build which would prevent conf from affecting config.h on subsequent +rebuilds. + +However, commit dd6efce934fb ("Makefile: Add .SECONDARY") adds the +.SECONDARY special target, which prevents intermediate files from being +deleted after the build [2]. Thus, conf persists to the first no-op +build, making config.h out of date. Since config.h is updated during +this first rebuild, conf is no longer newer than it, and thus subsequent +no-op builds behave as expected. + +Fix this by preventing conf from being treated as an intermediate file +by adding it as a prerequisite of the .NOTINTERMEDIATE special target, +which causes conf to always be rebuilt if it does not exist. Thus, on +the initial clean compile, config.h will be updated after building conf +as a prerequisite, preventing config.h from being marked out of date on +a subsequent rebuild. + +[1] https://www.gnu.org/software/make/manual/html_node/Chained-Rules.html +[2] https://www.gnu.org/software/make/manual/html_node/Special-Targets.html + + +### drivers/efi/uefi_capsules.c: coalesce and store UEFI capsules + +How it approximately works: + +(During a normal system run): +1. OS puts a capsule into RAM and calls UpdateCapsule() function of EFI +runtime +2. If applying the update requires a reboot, EFI implementation creates +a new CapsuleUpdateData* EFI variable pointing at the beginning of +capsules description (not data, but description of the data) and does +a warm reboot leaving capsule data and its description in RAM to be +picked by firmware on the next boot process + +(After DEV_INIT:) +3. Capsules are discovered by checking for CapsuleUpdateData* variables +4. Capsule description in memory and capsule data is validated for +Sanity +5. Capsule data is coalesced into a continuous piece of memory + +(On BS_WRITE_TABLES via dasharo_add_capsules_to_bootmem() hook:) +6. Buffer with coalesced capsules is marked as reserved + +(On BS_WRITE_TABLES via lb_uefi_capsules() hook:) + +7. coreboot table entry is added for each of the discovered capsules + +(In UEFI payload:) +8. CapsuleUpdateData* get removed +9. coreboot table is checked for any update capsules which are then applied + + + +Additional coreboot changes +--------------------------- + +* Add Serial Flash Discoverable Parameters (SFDP) Support +* Add Replay Protected Monotonic Counter (RPMC) Support +* arch/arm64: Add Clang as supported compiler +* Add initial experimental Link-time Optimization (LTO) support +* util/scripts: Add script to capture commands from build +* Transform more devicetree options into booleans +* Make more mainboards using the AZALIA_PIN_DESC macro +* More effort for reworking the audio jacks setup +* libgfxinit: Add option to configure screen rotation +* Additional functions supposed in ACPI interface for Intel WiFi and BT devices + + + +Changes to external resources +----------------------------- + +### Toolchain updates + +* binutils from 2.42 to 2.43.1 +* GCC from 14.1.0 to 14.2.0 +* CMake from 3.29.3 to 3.30.2 +* LLVM from 18.1.6 to 18.1.8 + + +### Git submodule pointers + +* 3rdparty/arm-trusted-firmware: Update from commit id c5b8de86c8 to 15e5c6c91d (693 commits) +* 3rdparty/blobs: Update from commit id a8db7dfe82 to 14f8fcc1b4 (15 commits) +* 3rdparty/fsp: Update from commit id 800c85770b to 851f7105d8 (24 commits) +* 3rdparty/intel-microcode: Update from commit id 5278dfcf98 to 8ac9378a84 (4 commits) +* 3rdparty/open-power-signing-utils: add SecureBoot utility for OpenPOWER + + +### External payloads + +* U-Boot: Upgrade from 2024.04 to 2024.07 +* payloads/edk2: Update default branch for MrChromebox repo to 2024-08 + + + +Platform Updates +---------------- + +### Added 39 mainboards: + +* Arm Neoverse N2 +* ASROCK IMB-1222 +* Dell Inc. Latitude E5420 +* Dell Inc. Latitude E5520 +* Dell Inc. Latitude E5530 +* Dell Inc. Latitude E6220 +* Dell Inc. Latitude E6230 +* Dell Inc. Latitude E6320 +* Dell Inc. Latitude E6330 +* Dell Inc. Latitude E6420 +* Dell Inc. Latitude E6520 +* Dell Inc. Latitude E6530 +* Dell Inc. OptiPlex 3050 Micro +* Erying Polestar G613 Pro (TGL-H) +* GIGABYTE GA-H77M-D3H +* Google -> Fatcat_ish +* Google -> Fatcatite +* Google -> Fatcatnuvo +* Google -> Felino +* Google -> Francka +* Google -> Hylia +* Google -> Kanix +* Google -> Navi +* Google -> Pujjogatwin +* Google -> Rull +* Google -> Skywalker +* Google -> Telith +* Google -> Uldrenite +* Hardkernel ODROID-H4 / H4+ / H4 Ultra +* HP Compaq 8200 Elite USDT +* HP Compaq 8300 Elite SFF +* Intel Frost Creek +* LattePanda LattePanda Mu +* Lenovo ThinkCentre M920 Tiny +* MiTAC Computing Whitestone 2 +* Star Labs Star Labs Byte Mk II (N200) +* Star Labs Star Labs StarFighter Mk I (i3-1315U, i7-13700H and i9-13900H) +* Topton X2F_N100 +* VIA EPIA-EX (work in progress) + + +### Updated CPUs/SoCs + +* Via C7 +* Intel Pantherlake +* Intel Snowridge +* Intel Xeon SP +* MediaTek MT8196 + + + +Statistics from the 24.08 to the 24.12 release +---------------------------------------------- + +* Total commits: 970 +* Total authors: 126 +* New authors: 20 + + + +coreboot Links and Contact Information +-------------------------------------- + +* Main Web site: https://www.coreboot.org +* Downloads: https://coreboot.org/downloads.html +* Source control: https://review.coreboot.org +* Documentation: https://doc.coreboot.org +* Issue tracker: https://ticket.coreboot.org/projects/coreboot +* Donations: https://coreboot.org/donate.html diff --git a/Documentation/releases/index.md b/Documentation/releases/index.md index f474514..29ba2d4 100644 --- a/Documentation/releases/index.md +++ b/Documentation/releases/index.md @@ -6,7 +6,7 @@ ```{toctree} :maxdepth: 1
-24.11 - November 2024 <coreboot-24.11-relnotes.md> +24.12 - December 2024 <coreboot-24.12-relnotes.md> ```
The [checklist] contains instructions to ensure that a release covers all
-
Felix Singer (Code Review)