Change in coreboot[master]: [TEST] dead code in the bootblock? how does the error look like?

[Nico Huber (Code Review)]

Hello Julius Werner, Felix Held,

I'd like you to do a code review. Please visit

https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/40241

to review the following change.

Change subject: [TEST] dead code in the bootblock? how does the error look like?
......................................................................

[TEST] dead code in the bootblock? how does the error look like?

Change-Id: Ib3fab91af136f874843bc59a9824e45bf873f6c8
Signed-off-by: Nico Huber 
---
M src/lib/bootblock.c
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)

git pull ssh://review.coreboot.org:29418/coreboot refs/changes/41/40241/1

diff --git a/src/lib/bootblock.c b/src/lib/bootblock.c
index 565d619..a7cccb6 100644
--- a/src/lib/bootblock.c
+++ b/src/lib/bootblock.c
@@ -10,6 +10,7 @@
 #include <program_loading.h>
 #include <symbols.h>
 #include <timestamp.h>
+#include <assert.h>

DECLARE_OPTIONAL_REGION(timestamp);

@@ -60,6 +61,8 @@

timestamp_add_now(TS_END_BOOTBLOCK);

+	dead_code();
+
    run_romstage();
 }

[Nico Huber (Code Review)]

Nico Huber has abandoned this change. ( https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/40241 )

Change subject: [TEST] dead code in the bootblock? how does the error look like?
......................................................................

Abandoned

it did its job, error looks good