Attention is currently required from: Ashish Kumar Mishra, Jérémy Compostella, Subrata Banik.
Paul Menzel has posted comments on this change by Jérémy Compostella. ( https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/83946?usp=email )
Change subject: soc/intel/common/block/cpu: Use the effective way size for NEM+ ......................................................................
Patch Set 10:
(8 comments)
Commit Message:
https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/83946/comment/2a0f37db_5d40a632?usp... : PS10, Line 7: NEM+ This (with +) is not mentioned in the commit message body.
https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/83946/comment/e9e52f40_565f2c0d?usp... : PS10, Line 7: Use the effective way size for NEM+ Maybe:
Add Kconfig for effective way size for NEM+
https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/83946/comment/1fe5958a_7960373b?usp... : PS10, Line 10: the : way size which should be considered for No-Eviction Mode (NEM) : purposes Add a comma at the end?
https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/83946/comment/e287ba26_b136337d?usp... : PS10, Line 21: has been is
https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/83946/comment/ec29808f_c5e571e6?usp... : PS10, Line 25: TEST=Verified on PTL Intel reference platform How? List the way size before and after?
File src/soc/intel/common/block/cpu/Kconfig:
https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/83946/comment/9a8a1006_c420fb26?usp... : PS10, Line 84: INTEL_CAR_ENEM_USE_EFFECTIVE_WAY_SIZE I would misinterpret it, that platforms not selecting this use an *in*effective way size, but from your commit message that is not true as they use the MSR.
`USE_POWER_OF_TWO_WAY_SIZE`? Or something with `NO_MSR` in it?
https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/83946/comment/10a99260_46043e42?usp... : PS10, Line 87: On some platforms List the known ones?
https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/83946/comment/767603b7_aad831cd?usp... : PS10, Line 87: the way size : which should be considered for eNEM purposes Add a comma at the end?