Subrata Banik has posted comments on this change. ( https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/31529 )
Change subject: vendorcode/intel/fsp/fsp2_0/cml: Add FSP header files for Cometlake ......................................................................
Patch Set 3:
(1 comment)
https://review.coreboot.org/#/c/31529/3/src/vendorcode/intel/fsp/fsp2_0/come... File src/vendorcode/intel/fsp/fsp2_0/cometlake/FspUpd.h:
https://review.coreboot.org/#/c/31529/3/src/vendorcode/intel/fsp/fsp2_0/come... PS3, Line 3: Copyright (c) 2019, Intel Corporation. All rights reserved.<BR>
Ok, but this file proves that part of the CMT FSP release were already published earlier. Then the copyright notice should state each year when parts of it were originally published, IMO.
Also, I thought quite the opposite is common practice: that for each file, we track individually when parts of it were published.
To make the scope of Intel's copyright notice clear, it would be nice if you could put a line about that above the notice in every file, e.g.:
This file is part of the Comet Lake FSP release.
Copyright (c) ...
i will feed this input and hopefully help to address ur concern
Subrata, I hope you don't mind this discussion.
Yes, its absolutely okay to have such discussion. but sometime we have project milestone hence little hurry to make some CL merged ASAP. :)
I already learned a lot, so I actually appreciate it :)