Attention is currently required from: Elyes Haouas, Felix Singer, Jérémy Compostella, Vasiliy Khoruzhick, yuchi.chen@intel.com.
Shuo Liu has posted comments on this change by yuchi.chen@intel.com. ( https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/83321?usp=email )
Change subject: soc/intel/snowridge: Add support for Intel Atom Snow Ridge SoC ......................................................................
Patch Set 15:
(10 comments)
File src/soc/intel/snowridge/Kconfig:
https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/83321/comment/3eb68f2c_d73a7a18?usp... : PS15, Line 42: select FSP_T_XIP Should FSP_S_XIP be selected as well?
https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/83321/comment/37f641fe_d9ee440f?usp... : PS15, Line 123: default 0x3ff00 if FSP_CAR Are FSP_CAR and !FSP_CAR both validated?
https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/83321/comment/a41daac6_ed51c2df?usp... : PS15, Line 244: 0xfe00000. It will be used until coreboot resource allocation overwrite it 0xfe000000?
File src/soc/intel/snowridge/Makefile.mk:
https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/83321/comment/82ebec05_65ba309b?usp... : PS15, Line 60: endif ## CONFIG_SOC_INTEL_FSP_SNOWRIDGE CONFIG_SOC_INTEL_SNOWRIDGE
File src/soc/intel/snowridge/chip.h:
https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/83321/comment/06f3c18a_52a2d278?usp... : PS15, Line 12: * additional root bus in stack 2 and 7 (UBox1). So what is for stack 2?
File src/soc/intel/snowridge/chip.c:
https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/83321/comment/0caa4002_0b24f221?usp... : PS15, Line 55: const BL_IIO_UDS *hob; Could you please follow C99 practice that declaring variable when using?
https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/83321/comment/3b0a1615_bf2cdb36?usp... : PS15, Line 75: if (sr[i].Personality >= BL_TYPE_DISABLED) is there any reason not using !=?
https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/83321/comment/d07132e2_1fcdda2e?usp... : PS15, Line 180: int i; for (int i = 0; ...)
File src/soc/intel/snowridge/systemagent.c:
https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/83321/comment/3992c000_6f93598d?usp... : PS15, Line 17: *size = CONFIG_ECAM_MMCONF_LENGTH; Shouldn't be probed by BAR access?
https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/83321/comment/a4616d7b_e875dace?usp... : PS15, Line 33: { The resource_cnt is a bit confusing, is there cases where resource_cnt != 1?