Furquan Shaikh has posted comments on this change. ( https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/31902 )
Change subject: soc/intel/cannonlake: Clear PMCON status bits
......................................................................
Patch Set 4:
(1 comment)
https://review.coreboot.org/#/c/31902/3/src/soc/intel/cannonlake/pmutil.c
File src/soc/intel/cannonlake/pmutil.c:
https://review.coreboot.org/#/c/31902/3/src/soc/intel/cannonlake/pmutil.c@14...
PS3, Line 146: pmc_clear_suspwrflr
makes sense, If FSP is relying on these values we have to make we clear these after FSP is done initialization.
Does FSP rely on these values? If yes, what for? Ideally I was thinking of doing this in pmc_init instead of pch_finalize.
I think FSP will clear the PWR_FLR status itself anyway right? In PchOnPciEnumCompleteCommon function
I don't think we should rely on FSP doing this.
--
To view, visit
https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/31902
To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit
https://review.coreboot.org/settings
Gerrit-Project: coreboot
Gerrit-Branch: master
Gerrit-Change-Id: If9863d52ed3c61b6a160df53f023b0787eaaed68
Gerrit-Change-Number: 31902
Gerrit-PatchSet: 4
Gerrit-Owner: Krishna P Bhat D
krishna.p.bhat.d@intel.com
Gerrit-Reviewer: Aamir Bohra
aamir.bohra@intel.com
Gerrit-Reviewer: Balaji Manigandan
balaji.manigandan@intel.com
Gerrit-Reviewer: Furquan Shaikh
furquan@google.com
Gerrit-Reviewer: Krishna P Bhat D
krishna.p.bhat.d@intel.com
Gerrit-Reviewer: Lijian Zhao
lijian.zhao@intel.com
Gerrit-Reviewer: Patrick Rudolph
siro@das-labor.org
Gerrit-Reviewer: Rizwan Qureshi
rizwan.qureshi@intel.com
Gerrit-Reviewer: Subrata Banik
subrata.banik@intel.com
Gerrit-Reviewer: build bot (Jenkins)
no-reply@coreboot.org
Gerrit-Comment-Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2019 00:18:08 +0000
Gerrit-HasComments: Yes
Gerrit-Has-Labels: No
Comment-In-Reply-To: Rizwan Qureshi
rizwan.qureshi@intel.com
Comment-In-Reply-To: Lijian Zhao
lijian.zhao@intel.com
Comment-In-Reply-To: Furquan Shaikh
furquan@google.com
Gerrit-MessageType: comment