[XS] Change in coreboot[main]: src/include: Introducing a new SET_32_BIT_FLAG(x) macro.

[Jérémy Compostella (Code Review)]

Attention is currently required from: Martin Roth, Saurabh Mishra, Subrata Banik.

Jérémy Compostella has posted comments on this change by Saurabh Mishra. ( https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/84142?usp=email )

Change subject: src/include: Introducing a new SET_32_BIT_FLAG(x) macro.
......................................................................

Patch Set 14: Code-Review-1

(1 comment)

Patchset:

PS14: 
I am not in favor of `SET_32_BIT_FLAG()`. This macro name is confusing to me. It seems like it would set a bit in a register instead of specifying a bit. I would be more in favor of a less cumbersome name like  `BIT_FLAG_32()`.

I would also recommend to add a comment on the definition explaining why we have to define an unusual macro instead of the more commonly accepted `BIT_32`.