[S] Change in coreboot[main]: drivers/intel/fsp2_0/ppi: Fix FSP PPI callback calling convention

[Jérémy Compostella (Code Review)]

Jérémy Compostella has uploaded this change for review. ( https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/80574?usp=email )

Change subject: drivers/intel/fsp2_0/ppi: Fix FSP PPI callback calling convention
......................................................................

drivers/intel/fsp2_0/ppi: Fix FSP PPI callback calling convention

Multi Processor PEIM-to-PEIM Interface deals with pointer to function
living in FSP space and which therefore need to be called with the
appropriate calling convention.

By casting the callback pointer to a `void (*)(void *)' when calling
`mp_run_on_all_aps' the C calling convention attribute is lost and the
the code generated by the compiler does not match the FSP function
calling convention.

This commit adds a function indirection to ensure FSP callbacks are
invoked correctly.

TEST=verified on Lunar Lake RVP board (lnlrvp)

Change-Id: If0397f5cc8d0f4f1872bd37a001fe42e0c37ec95
Signed-off-by: Jeremy Compostella 
---
M src/drivers/intel/fsp2_0/ppi/mp_service_ppi.c
1 file changed, 26 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

git pull ssh://review.coreboot.org:29418/coreboot refs/changes/74/80574/1

diff --git a/src/drivers/intel/fsp2_0/ppi/mp_service_ppi.c b/src/drivers/intel/fsp2_0/ppi/mp_service_ppi.c
index a891ba0..d00a737 100644
--- a/src/drivers/intel/fsp2_0/ppi/mp_service_ppi.c
+++ b/src/drivers/intel/fsp2_0/ppi/mp_service_ppi.c
@@ -12,6 +12,18 @@

#define BSP_CPU_SLOT 0

+struct efi_ap_procedure_caller_params {
+	efi_ap_procedure procedure;
+	void *argument;
+};
+
+static void efi_ap_procedure_caller(void *arg)
+{
+	struct efi_ap_procedure_caller_params *params =
+		(struct efi_ap_procedure_caller_params *)arg;
+	params->procedure(params->argument);
+}
+
 efi_return_status_t mp_get_number_of_processors(efi_uintn_t *number_of_processors,
    efi_uintn_t *number_of_enabled_processors)
 {
@@ -58,14 +70,19 @@
 efi_return_status_t mp_startup_all_aps(efi_ap_procedure procedure,
    bool run_serial, efi_uintn_t timeout_usec, void *argument)
 {
+	struct efi_ap_procedure_caller_params params = {
+		.procedure = procedure,
+		.argument = argument
+	};
+
    if (!cpu_info())
    	return FSP_DEVICE_ERROR;

if (procedure == NULL)
    	return FSP_INVALID_PARAMETER;

-	if (mp_run_on_all_aps((void *)procedure, argument, timeout_usec, !run_serial) !=
-				CB_SUCCESS) {
+	if (mp_run_on_all_aps((void *)efi_ap_procedure_caller, &params,
+			      timeout_usec, !run_serial) != CB_SUCCESS) {
    	printk(BIOS_DEBUG, "%s: Exit with Failure\n", __func__);
    	return FSP_NOT_STARTED;
    }
@@ -76,6 +93,11 @@
 efi_return_status_t mp_startup_all_cpus(efi_ap_procedure procedure,
    efi_uintn_t timeout_usec, void *argument)
 {
+	struct efi_ap_procedure_caller_params params = {
+		.procedure = procedure,
+		.argument = argument
+	};
+
    if (!cpu_info())
    	return FSP_DEVICE_ERROR;

@@ -99,8 +121,8 @@
     * due to lack of acquiring a spin lock while accessing common data structure in
     * multiprocessor environment.
     */
-	if (mp_run_on_all_aps((void *)procedure, argument, timeout_usec, false) !=
-				CB_SUCCESS) {
+	if (mp_run_on_all_aps((void *)efi_ap_procedure_caller,
+			      &params, timeout_usec, false) != CB_SUCCESS) {
    	printk(BIOS_DEBUG, "%s: Exit with Failure\n", __func__);
    	return FSP_NOT_STARTED;
    }