Attention is currently required from: Nicholas Chin.
Nicholas Chin has posted comments on this change. ( https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/69981 )
Change subject: [NEEDS TEST] util/superiotool: Replace iopl with ioperm ......................................................................
Patch Set 2:
(1 comment)
File util/superiotool/superiotool.c:
https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/69981/comment/63580206_374eb8e7 PS2, Line 330: printf("Superiotool must be run as root.\n"); Should we actually check what the return value is to see if it is a permission error? Right now this message assumes that any error means it wasn't run as root, which wasn't the case in bug #440. Although it was run as root, iopl returned a different error as it wasn't implemented but still confusingly printed this message.