[coreboot-gerrit] [M] Change in coreboot[master]: soc/intel/adl: Option to create unified AP FW for UFS/Non-UFS SKUs

[Subrata Banik (Code Review)]

Attention is currently required from: Tarun Tuli, Kyle Lin, Derek Huang, Kapil Porwal, Reka Norman, Ivy Jian, Eric Lai.

Subrata Banik has posted comments on this change. ( https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/71988 )

Change subject: soc/intel/adl: Option to create unified AP FW for UFS/Non-UFS SKUs
......................................................................

Patch Set 1:

(1 comment)

Patchset:

PS1:
> Please make sure extra warm boot can pass the FAFT...

may be I'm missing something but u can guide me, what specific scenarios/test you think FAFT will fail due to extra warm reset?

Do FAFT is aware of boot mode? I'm trying to think how it can even expect that. As per FSP policy there could be many reasons when FSP override straps and issue warm reset to take it into effect like CPuflexratio. Are we expecting extra warm reset in boot path might result into FAFT failure? if yes, which test scenario?