Furquan Shaikh has posted comments on this change. ( https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/31250 )
Change subject: soc/intel/cannonlake: Configure GPIOs again after FSP-S is done
......................................................................
Patch Set 5:
(1 comment)
Patchset:
PS5:
I have some insane idea \o/ My first thought was, why not set PadCfgLock, so FSP can't write the pad […]
Ugh.. I think it would be better to have FSP<->coreboot work in a more synchronized fashion than having to actively prevent what the other is doing. Locking down the padcfg will lead to other side-effects as well -- payloads, OS would run into issues trying to reconfigure pads, which won't be acceptable.
Are you seeing cases where the FSP is still configuring GPIOs it should not?
--
To view, visit
https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/31250
To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit
https://review.coreboot.org/settings
Gerrit-Project: coreboot
Gerrit-Branch: master
Gerrit-Change-Id: I7787aa8f185f633627bcedc7f23504bf4a5250b4
Gerrit-Change-Number: 31250
Gerrit-PatchSet: 5
Gerrit-Owner: Furquan Shaikh
furquan@google.com
Gerrit-Reviewer: Aaron Durbin
adurbin@chromium.org
Gerrit-Reviewer: Duncan Laurie
dlaurie@chromium.org
Gerrit-Reviewer: Furquan Shaikh
furquan@google.com
Gerrit-Reviewer: Patrick Georgi
pgeorgi@google.com
Gerrit-Reviewer: Patrick Rudolph
siro@das-labor.org
Gerrit-Reviewer: Shelley Chen
shchen@google.com
Gerrit-Reviewer: build bot (Jenkins)
no-reply@coreboot.org
Gerrit-CC: Michael Niewöhner
foss@mniewoehner.de
Gerrit-Comment-Date: Tue, 02 Feb 2021 18:57:15 +0000
Gerrit-HasComments: Yes
Gerrit-Has-Labels: No
Comment-In-Reply-To: Furquan Shaikh
furquan@google.com
Comment-In-Reply-To: Michael Niewöhner
foss@mniewoehner.de
Gerrit-MessageType: comment