Arthur Heymans has posted comments on this change. ( https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/34919 )
Change subject: Remove MIPS architecture ......................................................................
Patch Set 3: Code-Review+1
(1 comment)
Patch Set 3:
If we remove this before the next release, we should go back to the 4.10 release notes and mark it as removed there so it's easier for people to find.
I'm confused... isn't 4.10 done? Why would we put it there? I thought the notes for every release tally up what happened up to that release... for example, when we remove a mainboard (which also often happens in between releases) that's listed in the next release notes after that. Why should this be different?
I'm okay with waiting until October if that makes this easier, though, not in a rush.
I think it makes more sense to mark the removal to the new 4.11 release notes. Is there any reason to delay this change to after the release?
https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/34919/3/src/mainboard/google/urara/... File src/mainboard/google/urara/Kconfig:
https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/34919/3/src/mainboard/google/urara/... PS3, Line 35: BOOTBLOCK_MAINBOARD_INIT So the worst of x86 romcc bootblock behavior is present here too ^^