Attention is currently required from: Dolan Liu, Elyes Haouas, Eric Lai, Kapil Porwal, Matt DeVillier, Paul Menzel, Subrata Banik.
Jianeng Ceng has posted comments on this change. ( https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/81773?usp=email )
Change subject: drivers/i2c/rt5645: Add RT5645 amp driver
......................................................................
Patch Set 25:
(3 comments)
Commit Message:
https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/81773/comment/56a7e830_02383368 :
PS24, Line 9: In order to be different from rt5663, the driver of RT5645 is
: specially declared.
> while the wording here is slightly awkward, I don't see enumerating the differences between the two […]
Done
https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/81773/comment/200dca0a_42bd74f3 :
PS24, Line 17:
> or stated another way, the ACPI device is being created specifically for Linux
Done
File src/drivers/i2c/rt5645/rt5645.c:
https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/81773/comment/660e91a0_c684ba82 :
PS24, Line 48: acpigen_write_STA(ACPI_STATUS_DEVICE_HIDDEN_ON);
> Maybe add a comment here, that it is for Microsoft Windows.
Done
--
To view, visit https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/81773?usp=email
To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit https://review.coreboot.org/settings
Gerrit-Project: coreboot
Gerrit-Branch: main
Gerrit-Change-Id: I602fcc4dd8576043943f6e20884edc4703350320
Gerrit-Change-Number: 81773
Gerrit-PatchSet: 25
Gerrit-Owner: Jianeng Ceng <cengjianeng(a)huaqin.corp-partner.google.com>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Dolan Liu <liuyong5(a)huaqin.corp-partner.google.com>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Eric Lai <ericllai(a)google.com>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Kapil Porwal <kapilporwal(a)google.com>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Matt DeVillier <matt.devillier(a)gmail.com>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Subrata Banik <subratabanik(a)google.com>
Gerrit-Reviewer: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply(a)coreboot.org>
Gerrit-CC: Elyes Haouas <ehaouas(a)noos.fr>
Gerrit-CC: Paul Menzel <paulepanter(a)mailbox.org>
Gerrit-Attention: Eric Lai <ericllai(a)google.com>
Gerrit-Attention: Subrata Banik <subratabanik(a)google.com>
Gerrit-Attention: Matt DeVillier <matt.devillier(a)gmail.com>
Gerrit-Attention: Kapil Porwal <kapilporwal(a)google.com>
Gerrit-Attention: Paul Menzel <paulepanter(a)mailbox.org>
Gerrit-Attention: Dolan Liu <liuyong5(a)huaqin.corp-partner.google.com>
Gerrit-Attention: Elyes Haouas <ehaouas(a)noos.fr>
Gerrit-Comment-Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2024 01:16:50 +0000
Gerrit-HasComments: Yes
Gerrit-Has-Labels: No
Comment-In-Reply-To: Matt DeVillier <matt.devillier(a)gmail.com>
Comment-In-Reply-To: Paul Menzel <paulepanter(a)mailbox.org>
Gerrit-MessageType: comment
Attention is currently required from: Dolan Liu, Elyes Haouas, Eric Lai, Jianeng Ceng, Kapil Porwal, Matt DeVillier, Paul Menzel, Subrata Banik.
Hello Dolan Liu, Eric Lai, Kapil Porwal, Matt DeVillier, Subrata Banik, build bot (Jenkins),
I'd like you to reexamine a change. Please visit
https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/81773?usp=email
to look at the new patch set (#25).
The following approvals got outdated and were removed:
Code-Review+1 by Eric Lai, Code-Review+1 by Matt DeVillier, Code-Review+1 by Subrata Banik, Code-Review+2 by Kapil Porwal, Verified+1 by build bot (Jenkins)
Change subject: drivers/i2c/rt5645: Add RT5645 amp driver
......................................................................
drivers/i2c/rt5645: Add RT5645 amp driver
RT5663 is very old and it was used the hard code like RT53 or 10EC5663,
which is the different series from RT5645/5650, it may caused some
ambiguity. Because I2C generic driver dose not support dsd gpio
setting, we declared the new rt5645 series driver for expansion.
Add RT5645 AMP support. The kernel driver of 5650 is written
in rt5645.c. Add acpi name cbj-sleeve-gpios for power gate GPIO.
ALC5650 DataSheet Rev 0.93
Realtek upstream link:
https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240404035747.118064-1-derek.fang@realtek.com/
Hide the device because of Microsoft Windows.
BUG=None
TEST=verified in anraggar and probe device rt5650 succeed
```
\_SB.PCI0.I2C3.RT58: Realtek RT5650
```
Change-Id: I602fcc4dd8576043943f6e20884edc4703350320
Signed-off-by: Jianeng Ceng <cengjianeng(a)huaqin.corp-partner.google.com>
---
A src/drivers/i2c/rt5645/Kconfig
A src/drivers/i2c/rt5645/Makefile.mk
A src/drivers/i2c/rt5645/chip.h
A src/drivers/i2c/rt5645/rt5645.c
4 files changed, 144 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
git pull ssh://review.coreboot.org:29418/coreboot refs/changes/73/81773/25
--
To view, visit https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/81773?usp=email
To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit https://review.coreboot.org/settings
Gerrit-Project: coreboot
Gerrit-Branch: main
Gerrit-Change-Id: I602fcc4dd8576043943f6e20884edc4703350320
Gerrit-Change-Number: 81773
Gerrit-PatchSet: 25
Gerrit-Owner: Jianeng Ceng <cengjianeng(a)huaqin.corp-partner.google.com>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Dolan Liu <liuyong5(a)huaqin.corp-partner.google.com>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Eric Lai <ericllai(a)google.com>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Kapil Porwal <kapilporwal(a)google.com>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Matt DeVillier <matt.devillier(a)gmail.com>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Subrata Banik <subratabanik(a)google.com>
Gerrit-Reviewer: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply(a)coreboot.org>
Gerrit-CC: Elyes Haouas <ehaouas(a)noos.fr>
Gerrit-CC: Paul Menzel <paulepanter(a)mailbox.org>
Gerrit-Attention: Eric Lai <ericllai(a)google.com>
Gerrit-Attention: Subrata Banik <subratabanik(a)google.com>
Gerrit-Attention: Matt DeVillier <matt.devillier(a)gmail.com>
Gerrit-Attention: Kapil Porwal <kapilporwal(a)google.com>
Gerrit-Attention: Paul Menzel <paulepanter(a)mailbox.org>
Gerrit-Attention: Dolan Liu <liuyong5(a)huaqin.corp-partner.google.com>
Gerrit-Attention: Jianeng Ceng <cengjianeng(a)huaqin.corp-partner.google.com>
Gerrit-Attention: Elyes Haouas <ehaouas(a)noos.fr>
Gerrit-MessageType: newpatchset
Attention is currently required from: Arthur Heymans, Jérémy Compostella, Kapil Porwal, Nico Huber, Patrick Rudolph, Subrata Banik.
Julius Werner has posted comments on this change. ( https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/81960?usp=email )
Change subject: arch/x86: Enable long mode entry into payload for x86_64 support
......................................................................
Patch Set 14:
(2 comments)
Patchset:
PS14:
Sorry for being late to this discussion. So is the decision here now that there's gonna be two entry points, or just a single one? Because using another payload segment type sounds like you want a whole second entry point, but your code is currently not doing that yet (it looks like it's just using the segment type as a boolean flag).
Personally, I don't think the two entry points are really worth it. I'd posit that while compatibility of newer coreboot versions to older payloads is nice and something we have preserved for a long time, compatibility of older coreboot with newer payloads gets broken regularly anyway and not something people really care about. Basically every time we add a new coreboot table entry (which happens a lot), that's usually to communicate something to the payload that it requires (and it won't work right and often hang without it), and I don't recall anybody ever complaining about that. In practice I think that while payloads may be binaries that get reused after a coreboot update, the people who do build their own payload also tend to build their own coreboot anyway (and keep their payload repo synced to whatever coreboot branch they're planning to use it with, not ToT).
If we're okay with only one entry point and all we need is a flag that says whether a payload is 32 or 64 bit, I don't think payload segments are a great way to model that. They're designed to always be associated with a memory area and not really efficient to store other stuff. Besides, the code currently in this patch looks like it expects the PAYLOAD_SEGMENT_X86_LONG_MODE_ENTRY beyond the PAYLOAD_SEGMENT_ENTRY(?), which is not correct and not safe because PAYLOAD_SEGMENT_ENTRY is defined as the segment that ends the segment list. Reading beyond it means you'd read beyond the end of the list on older payloads.
I think the best way to model this would just be with a different CBFS file type (e.g. 0x22 CBFS_TYPE_SELF64). That also means the information will automatically be available in `arch_prog_run()` and you don't need any extra effort to extract it.
File src/arch/x86/boot.c:
https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/81960/comment/e0d3dc98_ea30b305 :
PS14, Line 32: void *mapping = cbfs_type_map(prog_name(&payload), NULL, &payload.cbfs_type);
Please don't find and parse the entire payload again in this code. Instead, modify selfboot.c to find the new segment type and expose the info somehow (e.g. if we're going to have two different entry points then you'd have to add an `entry64` member to `struct prog`... otherwise, just adding a bool for this should be fine.
Moving this to a CBFS type would make things easier because that's already stored in `struct prog` right now.
--
To view, visit https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/81960?usp=email
To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit https://review.coreboot.org/settings
Gerrit-Project: coreboot
Gerrit-Branch: main
Gerrit-Change-Id: Ic5e6f0af11c05e8b075b8c20880c012747a1df9b
Gerrit-Change-Number: 81960
Gerrit-PatchSet: 14
Gerrit-Owner: Subrata Banik <subratabanik(a)google.com>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Arthur Heymans <arthur(a)aheymans.xyz>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Julius Werner <jwerner(a)chromium.org>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Jérémy Compostella <jeremy.compostella(a)intel.com>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Kapil Porwal <kapilporwal(a)google.com>
Gerrit-Reviewer: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply(a)coreboot.org>
Gerrit-CC: David Hendricks <david.hendricks(a)gmail.com>
Gerrit-CC: Matt DeVillier <matt.devillier(a)gmail.com>
Gerrit-CC: Nico Huber <nico.h(a)gmx.de>
Gerrit-CC: Patrick Rudolph <patrick.rudolph(a)9elements.com>
Gerrit-CC: Werner Zeh <werner.zeh(a)siemens.com>
Gerrit-Attention: Nico Huber <nico.h(a)gmx.de>
Gerrit-Attention: Subrata Banik <subratabanik(a)google.com>
Gerrit-Attention: Patrick Rudolph <patrick.rudolph(a)9elements.com>
Gerrit-Attention: Jérémy Compostella <jeremy.compostella(a)intel.com>
Gerrit-Attention: Kapil Porwal <kapilporwal(a)google.com>
Gerrit-Attention: Arthur Heymans <arthur(a)aheymans.xyz>
Gerrit-Comment-Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2024 23:55:51 +0000
Gerrit-HasComments: Yes
Gerrit-Has-Labels: No
Gerrit-MessageType: comment
Attention is currently required from: Christian Walter, Elyes Haouas, Felix Singer, Martin L Roth, Martin Roth, Name of user not set #1005382, Naveen Iyer, Paul Menzel.
Felix Held has posted comments on this change. ( https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/82006?usp=email )
Change subject: Makefile.mk: Associate reproducible build to commit ID
......................................................................
Patch Set 7:
(1 comment)
Patchset:
PS7:
> The regular build should be reproducible. If it isn't, that's a bug. […]
hmm, might be that i misremembered things or things changed in the last few years, but if the regular build already is reproducible, this might not be needed. back in the days, the regular build wasn't reproducible and i assumed that the date in the binary is the build date, but if it's the commit date nowadays, the regular build might already be reproducible. so it looks like i gave wrong advice based on what i thought was the case here :/
--
To view, visit https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/82006?usp=email
To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit https://review.coreboot.org/settings
Gerrit-Project: coreboot
Gerrit-Branch: main
Gerrit-Change-Id: I97b0c4ea654df23844f31a3398b6f0d05dfec1ab
Gerrit-Change-Number: 82006
Gerrit-PatchSet: 7
Gerrit-Owner: Naveen Iyer
Gerrit-Reviewer: Christian Walter <christian.walter(a)9elements.com>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Elyes Haouas <ehaouas(a)noos.fr>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Felix Held <felix-coreboot(a)felixheld.de>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Felix Singer <service+coreboot-gerrit(a)felixsinger.de>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Martin L Roth <gaumless(a)gmail.com>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Naveen Iyer
Gerrit-Reviewer: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply(a)coreboot.org>
Gerrit-CC: Martin Roth <martin.roth(a)amd.corp-partner.google.com>
Gerrit-CC: Name of user not set #1005382
Gerrit-CC: Paul Menzel <paulepanter(a)mailbox.org>
Gerrit-Attention: Felix Singer <service+coreboot-gerrit(a)felixsinger.de>
Gerrit-Attention: Martin L Roth <gaumless(a)gmail.com>
Gerrit-Attention: Naveen Iyer
Gerrit-Attention: Name of user not set #1005382
Gerrit-Attention: Paul Menzel <paulepanter(a)mailbox.org>
Gerrit-Attention: Christian Walter <christian.walter(a)9elements.com>
Gerrit-Attention: Martin Roth <martin.roth(a)amd.corp-partner.google.com>
Gerrit-Attention: Elyes Haouas <ehaouas(a)noos.fr>
Gerrit-Comment-Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2024 23:22:21 +0000
Gerrit-HasComments: Yes
Gerrit-Has-Labels: No
Comment-In-Reply-To: Name of user not set #1005382
Comment-In-Reply-To: Martin Roth <martin.roth(a)amd.corp-partner.google.com>
Comment-In-Reply-To: Felix Held <felix-coreboot(a)felixheld.de>
Gerrit-MessageType: comment
Attention is currently required from: Christian Walter, Elyes Haouas, Felix Held, Felix Singer, Martin L Roth, Name of user not set #1005382, Paul Menzel.
Naveen Iyer has posted comments on this change. ( https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/82006?usp=email )
Change subject: Makefile.mk: Associate reproducible build to commit ID
......................................................................
Patch Set 7:
(1 comment)
File util/genbuild_h/genbuild_h.sh:
https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/82006/comment/0cf45692_25a3e49b :
PS7, Line 37: H
> does %H vs %h make any difference? would probably be good to use the same as in the already existing […]
%H (capital H) gives the complete hash. Now, is the complete hash really necessary? I thought of hash collisions in the future. But that might be too far fetched. I can stick to %h (small H) for now.
--
To view, visit https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/82006?usp=email
To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit https://review.coreboot.org/settings
Gerrit-Project: coreboot
Gerrit-Branch: main
Gerrit-Change-Id: I97b0c4ea654df23844f31a3398b6f0d05dfec1ab
Gerrit-Change-Number: 82006
Gerrit-PatchSet: 7
Gerrit-Owner: Naveen Iyer
Gerrit-Reviewer: Christian Walter <christian.walter(a)9elements.com>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Elyes Haouas <ehaouas(a)noos.fr>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Felix Held <felix-coreboot(a)felixheld.de>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Felix Singer <service+coreboot-gerrit(a)felixsinger.de>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Martin L Roth <gaumless(a)gmail.com>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Naveen Iyer
Gerrit-Reviewer: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply(a)coreboot.org>
Gerrit-CC: Martin Roth <martin.roth(a)amd.corp-partner.google.com>
Gerrit-CC: Name of user not set #1005382
Gerrit-CC: Paul Menzel <paulepanter(a)mailbox.org>
Gerrit-Attention: Felix Singer <service+coreboot-gerrit(a)felixsinger.de>
Gerrit-Attention: Martin L Roth <gaumless(a)gmail.com>
Gerrit-Attention: Name of user not set #1005382
Gerrit-Attention: Paul Menzel <paulepanter(a)mailbox.org>
Gerrit-Attention: Christian Walter <christian.walter(a)9elements.com>
Gerrit-Attention: Felix Held <felix-coreboot(a)felixheld.de>
Gerrit-Attention: Elyes Haouas <ehaouas(a)noos.fr>
Gerrit-Comment-Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2024 22:55:01 +0000
Gerrit-HasComments: Yes
Gerrit-Has-Labels: No
Comment-In-Reply-To: Felix Held <felix-coreboot(a)felixheld.de>
Gerrit-MessageType: comment
Attention is currently required from: Christian Walter, Elyes Haouas, Felix Held, Felix Singer, Martin L Roth, Name of user not set #1005382, Naveen Iyer, Paul Menzel.
Martin Roth has posted comments on this change. ( https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/82006?usp=email )
Change subject: Makefile.mk: Associate reproducible build to commit ID
......................................................................
Patch Set 7:
(1 comment)
Patchset:
PS7:
> the regular build includes the git hash, but also a build data, so it's not reproducible. […]
The regular build should be reproducible. If it isn't, that's a bug. We can include the git hash - that's reproducible as well - we don't need a separate build.
--
To view, visit https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/82006?usp=email
To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit https://review.coreboot.org/settings
Gerrit-Project: coreboot
Gerrit-Branch: main
Gerrit-Change-Id: I97b0c4ea654df23844f31a3398b6f0d05dfec1ab
Gerrit-Change-Number: 82006
Gerrit-PatchSet: 7
Gerrit-Owner: Naveen Iyer
Gerrit-Reviewer: Christian Walter <christian.walter(a)9elements.com>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Elyes Haouas <ehaouas(a)noos.fr>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Felix Held <felix-coreboot(a)felixheld.de>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Felix Singer <service+coreboot-gerrit(a)felixsinger.de>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Martin L Roth <gaumless(a)gmail.com>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Naveen Iyer
Gerrit-Reviewer: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply(a)coreboot.org>
Gerrit-CC: Martin Roth <martin.roth(a)amd.corp-partner.google.com>
Gerrit-CC: Name of user not set #1005382
Gerrit-CC: Paul Menzel <paulepanter(a)mailbox.org>
Gerrit-Attention: Felix Singer <service+coreboot-gerrit(a)felixsinger.de>
Gerrit-Attention: Martin L Roth <gaumless(a)gmail.com>
Gerrit-Attention: Naveen Iyer
Gerrit-Attention: Name of user not set #1005382
Gerrit-Attention: Paul Menzel <paulepanter(a)mailbox.org>
Gerrit-Attention: Christian Walter <christian.walter(a)9elements.com>
Gerrit-Attention: Felix Held <felix-coreboot(a)felixheld.de>
Gerrit-Attention: Elyes Haouas <ehaouas(a)noos.fr>
Gerrit-Comment-Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2024 21:29:26 +0000
Gerrit-HasComments: Yes
Gerrit-Has-Labels: No
Comment-In-Reply-To: Name of user not set #1005382
Comment-In-Reply-To: Martin Roth <martin.roth(a)amd.corp-partner.google.com>
Comment-In-Reply-To: Felix Held <felix-coreboot(a)felixheld.de>
Gerrit-MessageType: comment
Attention is currently required from: Christian Walter, Elyes Haouas, Felix Singer, Martin L Roth, Martin Roth, Name of user not set #1005382, Naveen Iyer, Paul Menzel.
Felix Held has posted comments on this change. ( https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/82006?usp=email )
Change subject: Makefile.mk: Associate reproducible build to commit ID
......................................................................
Patch Set 7:
(3 comments)
File Makefile.mk:
https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/82006/comment/e5c75454_04305592 :
PS7, Line 28: KERNELVERSION := $(shell test -z "$$(git status --porcelain)" && git log --no-abbrev-commit -1 --format="format:%H" )
this does a similar thing as the case below, so it would probably be better to use that in that case too instead of sort-of reimplementing it. the check for the tree not being dirty could probably be integrated into that case and only be done in the BUILD_TIMELESS_WITH_GITREV case
https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/82006/comment/15786882_7068a7e6 :
PS7, Line 496: CPPFLAGS_common += -D__TIMELESS__
this also needs to be done in the BUILD_TIMELESS_WITH_GITREV case for the build to be reproducible; otherwise the asserts will still contain line numbers
File util/genbuild_h/genbuild_h.sh:
https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/82006/comment/6fa6fdee_3e6de4fd :
PS7, Line 37: H
does %H vs %h make any difference? would probably be good to use the same as in the already existing case after this one
--
To view, visit https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/82006?usp=email
To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit https://review.coreboot.org/settings
Gerrit-Project: coreboot
Gerrit-Branch: main
Gerrit-Change-Id: I97b0c4ea654df23844f31a3398b6f0d05dfec1ab
Gerrit-Change-Number: 82006
Gerrit-PatchSet: 7
Gerrit-Owner: Naveen Iyer
Gerrit-Reviewer: Christian Walter <christian.walter(a)9elements.com>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Elyes Haouas <ehaouas(a)noos.fr>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Felix Held <felix-coreboot(a)felixheld.de>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Felix Singer <service+coreboot-gerrit(a)felixsinger.de>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Martin L Roth <gaumless(a)gmail.com>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Naveen Iyer
Gerrit-Reviewer: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply(a)coreboot.org>
Gerrit-CC: Martin Roth <martin.roth(a)amd.corp-partner.google.com>
Gerrit-CC: Name of user not set #1005382
Gerrit-CC: Paul Menzel <paulepanter(a)mailbox.org>
Gerrit-Attention: Felix Singer <service+coreboot-gerrit(a)felixsinger.de>
Gerrit-Attention: Martin L Roth <gaumless(a)gmail.com>
Gerrit-Attention: Naveen Iyer
Gerrit-Attention: Name of user not set #1005382
Gerrit-Attention: Paul Menzel <paulepanter(a)mailbox.org>
Gerrit-Attention: Christian Walter <christian.walter(a)9elements.com>
Gerrit-Attention: Martin Roth <martin.roth(a)amd.corp-partner.google.com>
Gerrit-Attention: Elyes Haouas <ehaouas(a)noos.fr>
Gerrit-Comment-Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2024 20:44:45 +0000
Gerrit-HasComments: Yes
Gerrit-Has-Labels: No
Gerrit-MessageType: comment
Attention is currently required from: Christian Walter, Elyes Haouas, Felix Singer, Martin L Roth, Martin Roth, Name of user not set #1005382, Naveen Iyer, Paul Menzel.
Felix Held has posted comments on this change. ( https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/82006?usp=email )
Change subject: Makefile.mk: Associate reproducible build to commit ID
......................................................................
Patch Set 7:
(1 comment)
Patchset:
PS7:
> Can I get GITREV info just from booting coreboot. […]
the regular build includes the git hash, but also a build data, so it's not reproducible. the timeless build doesn't include a data, but also doesn't include the git hash. to have a reproducible build that contains the git hash of the commit it was built from, i suggested implementing another option that does exactly this
--
To view, visit https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/82006?usp=email
To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit https://review.coreboot.org/settings
Gerrit-Project: coreboot
Gerrit-Branch: main
Gerrit-Change-Id: I97b0c4ea654df23844f31a3398b6f0d05dfec1ab
Gerrit-Change-Number: 82006
Gerrit-PatchSet: 7
Gerrit-Owner: Naveen Iyer
Gerrit-Reviewer: Christian Walter <christian.walter(a)9elements.com>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Elyes Haouas <ehaouas(a)noos.fr>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Felix Held <felix-coreboot(a)felixheld.de>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Felix Singer <service+coreboot-gerrit(a)felixsinger.de>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Martin L Roth <gaumless(a)gmail.com>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Naveen Iyer
Gerrit-Reviewer: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply(a)coreboot.org>
Gerrit-CC: Martin Roth <martin.roth(a)amd.corp-partner.google.com>
Gerrit-CC: Name of user not set #1005382
Gerrit-CC: Paul Menzel <paulepanter(a)mailbox.org>
Gerrit-Attention: Felix Singer <service+coreboot-gerrit(a)felixsinger.de>
Gerrit-Attention: Martin L Roth <gaumless(a)gmail.com>
Gerrit-Attention: Naveen Iyer
Gerrit-Attention: Name of user not set #1005382
Gerrit-Attention: Paul Menzel <paulepanter(a)mailbox.org>
Gerrit-Attention: Christian Walter <christian.walter(a)9elements.com>
Gerrit-Attention: Martin Roth <martin.roth(a)amd.corp-partner.google.com>
Gerrit-Attention: Elyes Haouas <ehaouas(a)noos.fr>
Gerrit-Comment-Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2024 20:32:50 +0000
Gerrit-HasComments: Yes
Gerrit-Has-Labels: No
Comment-In-Reply-To: Name of user not set #1005382
Comment-In-Reply-To: Martin Roth <martin.roth(a)amd.corp-partner.google.com>
Gerrit-MessageType: comment