Attention is currently required from: Dinesh Gehlot, Elyes Haouas, Eran Mitrani, Eric Lai, Frans Hendriks, Jakub Czapiga, Jayvik Desai, Jonathon Hall, Kapil Porwal, Lean Sheng Tan, Maxim, Michał Żygowski, Nick Vaccaro, Piotr Król, Pranava Y N, Rishika Raj, Subrata Banik, Tarun, Werner Zeh.
Nico Huber has posted comments on this change by Elyes Haouas. ( https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/84161?usp=email )
Change subject: tree: Use boolean for dptf_enable
......................................................................
Patch Set 1:
(1 comment)
Patchset:
PS1:
For my understanding, the natural language for "dptf_enable" would be "yes/no".
Works too, sure. I would call it `dptf_enabled` or `enable_dptf` then, though.
Anyway, I think we should make a decision for the patch series as a whole.
(Personally, I prefer to leave this to the individual, original author.)
C23 will not warn as probably it will convert int(0, 1) to bool(false, true) and this patch not about removing any warning. It is about using something that modern C provides.
C provides that, yes. Doesn't mean we have to use it when it makes things harder to read.
(out of topic: the switch [1], is on or off? :p )
To me that's on (circuit closed). I find these much easier to read than sliders ;)
--
To view, visit
https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/84161?usp=email
To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit
https://review.coreboot.org/settings?usp=email
Gerrit-MessageType: comment
Gerrit-Project: coreboot
Gerrit-Branch: main
Gerrit-Change-Id: Ic6e578199e7e4ca3a014eecb1eb7a4d9d24893b8
Gerrit-Change-Number: 84161
Gerrit-PatchSet: 1
Gerrit-Owner: Elyes Haouas
ehaouas@noos.fr
Gerrit-Reviewer: Dinesh Gehlot
digehlot@google.com
Gerrit-Reviewer: Eran Mitrani
mitrani@google.com
Gerrit-Reviewer: Eric Lai
ericllai@google.com
Gerrit-Reviewer: Erik van den Bogaert
ebogaert@eltan.com
Gerrit-Reviewer: Frans Hendriks
fhendriks@eltan.com
Gerrit-Reviewer: Jakub Czapiga
czapiga@google.com
Gerrit-Reviewer: Jayvik Desai
jayvik@google.com
Gerrit-Reviewer: Jonathon Hall
jonathon.hall@puri.sm
Gerrit-Reviewer: Kapil Porwal
kapilporwal@google.com
Gerrit-Reviewer: Lean Sheng Tan
sheng.tan@9elements.com
Gerrit-Reviewer: Maxim
max.senia.poliak@gmail.com
Gerrit-Reviewer: Michał Żygowski
michal.zygowski@3mdeb.com
Gerrit-Reviewer: Nick Vaccaro
nvaccaro@chromium.org
Gerrit-Reviewer: Nico Huber
nico.h@gmx.de
Gerrit-Reviewer: Piotr Król
piotr.krol@3mdeb.com
Gerrit-Reviewer: Pranava Y N
pranavayn@google.com
Gerrit-Reviewer: Rishika Raj
rishikaraj@google.com
Gerrit-Reviewer: Subrata Banik
subratabanik@google.com
Gerrit-Reviewer: Tarun
tstuli@gmail.com
Gerrit-Reviewer: Werner Zeh
werner.zeh@siemens.com
Gerrit-Reviewer: build bot (Jenkins)
no-reply@coreboot.org
Gerrit-Attention: Eric Lai
ericllai@google.com
Gerrit-Attention: Rishika Raj
rishikaraj@google.com
Gerrit-Attention: Eran Mitrani
mitrani@google.com
Gerrit-Attention: Jakub Czapiga
czapiga@google.com
Gerrit-Attention: Frans Hendriks
fhendriks@eltan.com
Gerrit-Attention: Dinesh Gehlot
digehlot@google.com
Gerrit-Attention: Nick Vaccaro
nvaccaro@chromium.org
Gerrit-Attention: Jonathon Hall
jonathon.hall@puri.sm
Gerrit-Attention: Tarun
tstuli@gmail.com
Gerrit-Attention: Piotr Król
piotr.krol@3mdeb.com
Gerrit-Attention: Jayvik Desai
jayvik@google.com
Gerrit-Attention: Michał Żygowski
michal.zygowski@3mdeb.com
Gerrit-Attention: Subrata Banik
subratabanik@google.com
Gerrit-Attention: Maxim
max.senia.poliak@gmail.com
Gerrit-Attention: Kapil Porwal
kapilporwal@google.com
Gerrit-Attention: Lean Sheng Tan
sheng.tan@9elements.com
Gerrit-Attention: Werner Zeh
werner.zeh@siemens.com
Gerrit-Attention: Pranava Y N
pranavayn@google.com
Gerrit-Attention: Elyes Haouas
ehaouas@noos.fr
Gerrit-Comment-Date: Wed, 11 Sep 2024 09:57:42 +0000
Gerrit-HasComments: Yes
Gerrit-Has-Labels: No
Comment-In-Reply-To: Eric Lai
ericllai@google.com
Comment-In-Reply-To: Nico Huber
nico.h@gmx.de
Comment-In-Reply-To: Elyes Haouas
ehaouas@noos.fr