Attention is currently required from: Christian Walter, Arthur Heymans.
Nico Huber has posted comments on this change. ( https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/64418 )
Change subject: security/tpm/crtm.c: Fix !CONFIG_BOOTBLOCK_IN_CBFS measuring
......................................................................
Patch Set 1:
(1 comment)
File src/security/tpm/tspi/crtm.c:
https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/64418/comment/914b88c8_0bc2ddbe
PS1, Line 74: } /* else: TODO: Add SoC specific measurement methods. */
Shouldn't we still return an error? or is this merely a best-effort
measuring? IOW, should people know that the measuring is incomplete?
(TBH, I don't understand self-measuring generally. It wouldn't make a
difference if we'd use a pre-computed hash, would it?)
--
To view, visit
https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/64418
To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit
https://review.coreboot.org/settings
Gerrit-Project: coreboot
Gerrit-Branch: master
Gerrit-Change-Id: Id47ecedbc8713ebd5d9814f1c4faf43c52780447
Gerrit-Change-Number: 64418
Gerrit-PatchSet: 1
Gerrit-Owner: Arthur Heymans
arthur@aheymans.xyz
Gerrit-Reviewer: Christian Walter
christian.walter@9elements.com
Gerrit-Reviewer: build bot (Jenkins)
no-reply@coreboot.org
Gerrit-CC: Nico Huber
nico.h@gmx.de
Gerrit-CC: Werner Zeh
werner.zeh@siemens.com
Gerrit-Attention: Christian Walter
christian.walter@9elements.com
Gerrit-Attention: Arthur Heymans
arthur@aheymans.xyz
Gerrit-Comment-Date: Tue, 17 May 2022 10:41:51 +0000
Gerrit-HasComments: Yes
Gerrit-Has-Labels: No
Gerrit-MessageType: comment