Attention is currently required from: Giammarco.
Anastasia Klimchuk has posted comments on this change. ( https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/76765?usp=email )
Change subject: flashchips.c: Add support for BY25D40A
......................................................................
Patch Set 1:
(3 comments)
Commit Message:
https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/76765/comment/a0b97175_6491452d :
PS1, Line 14:
You need to add testing info into commit message, which operations you ran on the chip. From the chip definition, looks like you did probing.
Keep the rest of commit message, it's all fine. Just add testing info.
It would be ideal if you share the logs from successful runs, can you upload logs to https://paste.flashrom.org/ ? and add the link in a comment?
https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/76765/comment/6176ea4e_a6e4464e :
PS1, Line 16: Signed-off-by: Giammarco Marzano stich86(a)gmail.com
Did you add this line manually? Because when you ask git to do this, it adds <> around email.
You need to have:
> Signed-off-by: Giammarco Marzano <stich86(a)gmail.com>
You can either correct manually, or next time you amend your commit, ask git to sign-off `git commit --amend -s`
If you ask git, it will add new line, and then you need to remove this current line.
Patchset:
PS1:
Giammarco, thank you for the patch! I have just two comments.
Also thanks for adding link to pull request, from it I discovered that the links in auto-response are broken. I will fix them, but I am glad you found guidelines anyway ;)
--
To view, visit https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/76765?usp=email
To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit https://review.coreboot.org/settings
Gerrit-Project: flashrom
Gerrit-Branch: master
Gerrit-Change-Id: I74a884549b24b1792e27c67ec65a1b185afc84e8
Gerrit-Change-Number: 76765
Gerrit-PatchSet: 1
Gerrit-Owner: Giammarco
Gerrit-Reviewer: Anastasia Klimchuk <aklm(a)chromium.org>
Gerrit-Reviewer: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply(a)coreboot.org>
Gerrit-Attention: Giammarco
Gerrit-Comment-Date: Sat, 29 Jul 2023 09:58:22 +0000
Gerrit-HasComments: Yes
Gerrit-Has-Labels: No
Gerrit-MessageType: comment
Attention is currently required from: Alexander Goncharov, Angel Pons, Carl-Daniel Hailfinger, Martin L Roth, Patrick Georgi, Peter Marheine, Stefan Reinauer, Thomas Heijligen.
Anastasia Klimchuk has posted comments on this change. ( https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/76455?usp=email )
Change subject: doc: Add code of conduct
......................................................................
Patch Set 3:
(2 comments)
Patchset:
PS2:
> > also added CB:75554 , it is already approved. […]
This patch is not merged either. I looked into unresolved comments in CB:75554 , that's small re-wordings but no big changes. In any case, of course this patch will be updated with the final merged version of CB:75554. Let's keep this comment unresolved, until CB:75554 merged.
I don't think it matters whether it is the strictest, or not the strictest. If it makes sense (I think it is), if it is relevant (I think it is), let's adopt it. But as I said above, after coreboot's patch merged.
PS2:
> What about option three?
3) Acknowledge that the friendliness document is a code of conduct?
Even if you disagree with its scope, enforcement, and level of detail, it is a code of conduct.
It is not, because there are 1-6 items that are missing.
Friendliness document has a lot of potential, but it requires more work to get it migrated to the new website. It is less work if we keep it as a Friendliness page, and more work if we upgrade it to Code of Conduct. Either way, it is doable, but it needs effort.
If it helps you, I was planning to migrate Friendliness myself, that was my first thought. But then when I started to inspect it closely I found that it's not straightforward. So in a case like this, when the end goal is far away, we can do it step by step.
> How do you know that nothing happened? Speaking as past maintainer, I know that something happened because I had to handle such stuff in the past.
Oh I was talking about recent times, not about stuff in the past. I fully believe you when you say you handled some stuff in the past, I am talking about the times I saw myself (approx last 3 years).
> so the enforcement actions were not noticed publically
It works with some people, and doesn't work with some other people. You never know. But it's good that you had a successful experience.
When I said "tell me about it", it doesn't need to be public. But if you can share some useful experience and knowledge as a past maintainer, I would be interested to listen!
--
To view, visit https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/76455?usp=email
To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit https://review.coreboot.org/settings
Gerrit-Project: flashrom
Gerrit-Branch: master
Gerrit-Change-Id: Ic4c646bc47d5db4d064a411d60a44f16559dfcee
Gerrit-Change-Number: 76455
Gerrit-PatchSet: 3
Gerrit-Owner: Anastasia Klimchuk <aklm(a)chromium.org>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Alexander Goncharov <chat(a)joursoir.net>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Angel Pons <th3fanbus(a)gmail.com>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Carl-Daniel Hailfinger <c-d.hailfinger.devel.2006(a)gmx.net>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Peter Marheine <pmarheine(a)chromium.org>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Stefan Reinauer <stefan.reinauer(a)coreboot.org>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Thomas Heijligen <src(a)posteo.de>
Gerrit-Reviewer: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply(a)coreboot.org>
Gerrit-CC: Martin L Roth <gaumless(a)gmail.com>
Gerrit-CC: Patrick Georgi <patrick(a)coreboot.org>
Gerrit-Attention: Patrick Georgi <patrick(a)coreboot.org>
Gerrit-Attention: Martin L Roth <gaumless(a)gmail.com>
Gerrit-Attention: Stefan Reinauer <stefan.reinauer(a)coreboot.org>
Gerrit-Attention: Thomas Heijligen <src(a)posteo.de>
Gerrit-Attention: Angel Pons <th3fanbus(a)gmail.com>
Gerrit-Attention: Carl-Daniel Hailfinger <c-d.hailfinger.devel.2006(a)gmx.net>
Gerrit-Attention: Peter Marheine <pmarheine(a)chromium.org>
Gerrit-Attention: Alexander Goncharov <chat(a)joursoir.net>
Gerrit-Comment-Date: Fri, 28 Jul 2023 13:51:09 +0000
Gerrit-HasComments: Yes
Gerrit-Has-Labels: No
Comment-In-Reply-To: Patrick Georgi <patrick(a)coreboot.org>
Comment-In-Reply-To: Stefan Reinauer <stefan.reinauer(a)coreboot.org>
Comment-In-Reply-To: Anastasia Klimchuk <aklm(a)chromium.org>
Comment-In-Reply-To: Carl-Daniel Hailfinger <c-d.hailfinger.devel.2006(a)gmx.net>
Comment-In-Reply-To: Peter Marheine <pmarheine(a)chromium.org>
Gerrit-MessageType: comment
Anastasia Klimchuk has uploaded this change for review. ( https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/76772?usp=email )
Change subject: doc: Add link to old wiki in the side menu
......................................................................
doc: Add link to old wiki in the side menu
While the process of migrating pages is ongoing, wiki can be useful
and is available in view-only mode.
Change-Id: I093dcb1d4ce2b3feeff61115e037cfa8075a8a52
Signed-off-by: Anastasia Klimchuk <aklm(a)flashrom.org>
---
M doc/index.rst
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 0 deletions(-)
git pull ssh://review.coreboot.org:29418/flashrom refs/changes/72/76772/1
diff --git a/doc/index.rst b/doc/index.rst
index d308155..407c923 100644
--- a/doc/index.rst
+++ b/doc/index.rst
@@ -12,6 +12,7 @@
about_flashrom/index
how_to_add_docs
documentation_license
+ Wiki website <https://wiki.flashrom.org/>
.. include:: intro.rst
--
To view, visit https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/76772?usp=email
To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit https://review.coreboot.org/settings
Gerrit-Project: flashrom
Gerrit-Branch: master
Gerrit-Change-Id: I093dcb1d4ce2b3feeff61115e037cfa8075a8a52
Gerrit-Change-Number: 76772
Gerrit-PatchSet: 1
Gerrit-Owner: Anastasia Klimchuk <aklm(a)chromium.org>
Gerrit-MessageType: newchange
Anastasia Klimchuk has uploaded this change for review. ( https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/76771?usp=email )
Change subject: doc: Add link to flashrom patches to dev guide
......................................................................
doc: Add link to flashrom patches to dev guide
People might be interested in what's currently ongoing in
development, and even more practically, have a look at examples
before creating their own patch. In fact, the latter is a good
idea to do. Giving the link in the intro of dev guide will
encourage that.
Viewing the patches does not require an account, so can be done
at the very beginning.
Change-Id: Iecd31a5e9a3683480b33fb9ba331545a0cf669b4
Signed-off-by: Anastasia Klimchuk <aklm(a)flashrom.org>
---
M doc/dev_guide/development_guide.rst
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 0 deletions(-)
git pull ssh://review.coreboot.org:29418/flashrom refs/changes/71/76771/1
diff --git a/doc/dev_guide/development_guide.rst b/doc/dev_guide/development_guide.rst
index 950fa91..35cd927 100644
--- a/doc/dev_guide/development_guide.rst
+++ b/doc/dev_guide/development_guide.rst
@@ -13,6 +13,7 @@
adjusted and you avoid frustration if there is some disagreement about the
design.
+You can look at the latest flashrom development efforts `here <https://review.coreboot.org/q/project:flashrom>`_.
Set up the git repository and dev environment
=============================================
--
To view, visit https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/76771?usp=email
To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit https://review.coreboot.org/settings
Gerrit-Project: flashrom
Gerrit-Branch: master
Gerrit-Change-Id: Iecd31a5e9a3683480b33fb9ba331545a0cf669b4
Gerrit-Change-Number: 76771
Gerrit-PatchSet: 1
Gerrit-Owner: Anastasia Klimchuk <aklm(a)chromium.org>
Gerrit-MessageType: newchange
Anastasia Klimchuk has submitted this change. ( https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/76675?usp=email )
Change subject: doc: Fix Contact link in README
......................................................................
doc: Fix Contact link in README
The link should be to another doc, that will work with any website
configuration. Old link only worked for wiki.
Change-Id: I6e2ec4f73494bebd5bd47bbeaa2051439d1d3bbd
Signed-off-by: Anastasia Klimchuk <aklm(a)flashrom.org>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/76675
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply(a)coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Peter Marheine <pmarheine(a)chromium.org>
---
M README.rst
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)
Approvals:
build bot (Jenkins): Verified
Peter Marheine: Looks good to me, approved
diff --git a/README.rst b/README.rst
index 428ae57..0a0ea08 100644
--- a/README.rst
+++ b/README.rst
@@ -55,6 +55,4 @@
https://www.flashrom.org/
-Available contact methods are
-
- https://www.flashrom.org/Contact
+For available contact methods see :doc:`contact`
--
To view, visit https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/76675?usp=email
To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit https://review.coreboot.org/settings
Gerrit-Project: flashrom
Gerrit-Branch: master
Gerrit-Change-Id: I6e2ec4f73494bebd5bd47bbeaa2051439d1d3bbd
Gerrit-Change-Number: 76675
Gerrit-PatchSet: 2
Gerrit-Owner: Anastasia Klimchuk <aklm(a)chromium.org>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Anastasia Klimchuk <aklm(a)chromium.org>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Angel Pons <th3fanbus(a)gmail.com>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Peter Marheine <pmarheine(a)chromium.org>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Thomas Heijligen <src(a)posteo.de>
Gerrit-Reviewer: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply(a)coreboot.org>
Gerrit-MessageType: merged
Anastasia Klimchuk has submitted this change. ( https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/76663?usp=email )
Change subject: doc: Fix the example Signed-off-by line to be displayed properly
......................................................................
doc: Fix the example Signed-off-by line to be displayed properly
It was not displayed, so needed to be fixed. Secondly, it is just
one line and can be an inline code markup instead of a code-block
(the latter was not displayed for some reasons).
Change-Id: I0f26d6fb03d1491daefa4a362068f674230e94a6
Signed-off-by: Anastasia Klimchuk <aklm(a)flashrom.org>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/76663
Reviewed-by: Peter Marheine <pmarheine(a)chromium.org>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply(a)coreboot.org>
---
M doc/dev_guide/development_guide.rst
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)
Approvals:
build bot (Jenkins): Verified
Peter Marheine: Looks good to me, approved
diff --git a/doc/dev_guide/development_guide.rst b/doc/dev_guide/development_guide.rst
index b4887ef..950fa91 100644
--- a/doc/dev_guide/development_guide.rst
+++ b/doc/dev_guide/development_guide.rst
@@ -87,9 +87,7 @@
<http://web.archive.org/web/20070306195036/http://osdlab.org/newsroom/press_…>`_
do. Add a note such as
-.. code-block::
-
- Signed-off-by: Random J Developer <random(a)developer.example.org>
+:code:`Signed-off-by: Random J Developer <random(a)developer.example.org>`
to your email/patch if you agree with the Developer's Certificate of Origin 1.1
printed below. Read `this post on the LKML
--
To view, visit https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/76663?usp=email
To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit https://review.coreboot.org/settings
Gerrit-Project: flashrom
Gerrit-Branch: master
Gerrit-Change-Id: I0f26d6fb03d1491daefa4a362068f674230e94a6
Gerrit-Change-Number: 76663
Gerrit-PatchSet: 2
Gerrit-Owner: Anastasia Klimchuk <aklm(a)chromium.org>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Alexander Goncharov <chat(a)joursoir.net>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Anastasia Klimchuk <aklm(a)chromium.org>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Peter Marheine <pmarheine(a)chromium.org>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Thomas Heijligen <src(a)posteo.de>
Gerrit-Reviewer: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply(a)coreboot.org>
Gerrit-MessageType: merged
Anastasia Klimchuk has submitted this change. ( https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/75744?usp=email )
Change subject: flash: Update the comment for flashchip eraseblocks
......................................................................
flash: Update the comment for flashchip eraseblocks
Change-Id: Ica7790667ac4c1baf961cb7a330e08178e2c0c28
Signed-off-by: Anastasia Klimchuk <aklm(a)chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/75744
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply(a)coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Aarya <aarya.chaumal(a)gmail.com>
---
M include/flash.h
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)
Approvals:
Aarya: Looks good to me, approved
build bot (Jenkins): Verified
diff --git a/include/flash.h b/include/flash.h
index 0eace15..4c08549 100644
--- a/include/flash.h
+++ b/include/flash.h
@@ -449,9 +449,7 @@
/*
* Erase blocks and associated erase function. Any chip erase function
* is stored as chip-sized virtual block together with said function.
- * The first one that fits will be chosen. There is currently no way to
- * influence that behaviour. For testing just comment out the other
- * elements or set the function pointer to NULL.
+ * The logic for how to optimally select erase functions is in erasure_layout.c
*/
struct block_eraser {
struct eraseblock {
--
To view, visit https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/75744?usp=email
To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit https://review.coreboot.org/settings
Gerrit-Project: flashrom
Gerrit-Branch: master
Gerrit-Change-Id: Ica7790667ac4c1baf961cb7a330e08178e2c0c28
Gerrit-Change-Number: 75744
Gerrit-PatchSet: 2
Gerrit-Owner: Anastasia Klimchuk <aklm(a)chromium.org>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Aarya <aarya.chaumal(a)gmail.com>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Anastasia Klimchuk <aklm(a)chromium.org>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Edward O'Callaghan <quasisec(a)chromium.org>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Thomas Heijligen <src(a)posteo.de>
Gerrit-Reviewer: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply(a)coreboot.org>
Gerrit-MessageType: merged
Attention is currently required from: Alexander Goncharov, Anastasia Klimchuk, Angel Pons, Martin L Roth, Patrick Georgi, Peter Marheine, Stefan Reinauer, Thomas Heijligen.
Carl-Daniel Hailfinger has posted comments on this change. ( https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/76455?usp=email )
Change subject: doc: Add code of conduct
......................................................................
Patch Set 3:
(1 comment)
Patchset:
PS2:
> It seems the main misunderstanding comes from "Acknowledge that rules already exist".
> Maybe some rules exist, but code of conduct does not exist. The project needs one.
Right. If the name is important, we can just rename the existing rules to "code of conduct". Then we have one. And the wikipedia definition of "code of conduct" also matches the old rules. (No, I didn't edit wikipedia to agree with me.)
> I see two options:
>
> 1) This patch adds code of conduct copied from coreboot as a starting point. We start discussions/reviews of a Friendliness page with the goal to rename and promote it to code of conduct. Once this is done, the new page replaces this initial version.
>
> 2) This patch adds code of conduct copied from coreboot as a starting point. We start discussions/reviews of a Friendliness page as an independent page, and then once it is done we have two pages: code of conduct and friendliness.
>
> There are few reasons why Friendliness cannot be migrated to the new format straight away, see below. Otherwise I would migrate it already.
>
> 1) Some parts are out-dated (we don't do code reviews on mailing list anymore)
> 2) Some parts unfinished (todo in the middle)
> 3) Some parts belong to dev guidelines
> 4) Some info better be on the Contacts page
> 5) Missing: clear definition of unacceptable behavior
> 6) Missing: clear statement that this rules are enforced (and how), clear explanation of consequences of 5)
What about option three?
3) Acknowledge that the friendliness document is a code of conduct?
Even if you disagree with its scope, enforcement, and level of detail, it is a code of conduct.
> I am more than happy to also add these as comments to the friendliness patch, once it is out for review.
>
> The very important property of code of conduct is that one can't violate it. That was missing from Friendliness: it was violated multiple times over the recent years and nothing happened.
How do you know that nothing happened? Speaking as past maintainer, I know that something happened because I had to handle such stuff in the past. However, I do believe in not shaming people in public, so the enforcement actions were not noticed publically.
> As a side note: I am really interested to hear the story about "conflicts bigger than the one which caused explosions two months ago"! Seriously, tell me about it, I haven't heard about it!
The involved parties know, and I don't want to shame people in public regardless of how long ago this happened.
--
To view, visit https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/76455?usp=email
To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit https://review.coreboot.org/settings
Gerrit-Project: flashrom
Gerrit-Branch: master
Gerrit-Change-Id: Ic4c646bc47d5db4d064a411d60a44f16559dfcee
Gerrit-Change-Number: 76455
Gerrit-PatchSet: 3
Gerrit-Owner: Anastasia Klimchuk <aklm(a)chromium.org>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Alexander Goncharov <chat(a)joursoir.net>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Angel Pons <th3fanbus(a)gmail.com>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Carl-Daniel Hailfinger <c-d.hailfinger.devel.2006(a)gmx.net>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Peter Marheine <pmarheine(a)chromium.org>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Stefan Reinauer <stefan.reinauer(a)coreboot.org>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Thomas Heijligen <src(a)posteo.de>
Gerrit-Reviewer: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply(a)coreboot.org>
Gerrit-CC: Martin L Roth <gaumless(a)gmail.com>
Gerrit-CC: Patrick Georgi <patrick(a)coreboot.org>
Gerrit-Attention: Patrick Georgi <patrick(a)coreboot.org>
Gerrit-Attention: Martin L Roth <gaumless(a)gmail.com>
Gerrit-Attention: Stefan Reinauer <stefan.reinauer(a)coreboot.org>
Gerrit-Attention: Thomas Heijligen <src(a)posteo.de>
Gerrit-Attention: Angel Pons <th3fanbus(a)gmail.com>
Gerrit-Attention: Anastasia Klimchuk <aklm(a)chromium.org>
Gerrit-Attention: Peter Marheine <pmarheine(a)chromium.org>
Gerrit-Attention: Alexander Goncharov <chat(a)joursoir.net>
Gerrit-Comment-Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2023 01:37:15 +0000
Gerrit-HasComments: Yes
Gerrit-Has-Labels: No
Comment-In-Reply-To: Stefan Reinauer <stefan.reinauer(a)coreboot.org>
Comment-In-Reply-To: Anastasia Klimchuk <aklm(a)chromium.org>
Comment-In-Reply-To: Carl-Daniel Hailfinger <c-d.hailfinger.devel.2006(a)gmx.net>
Gerrit-MessageType: comment
Attention is currently required from: Alexander Goncharov, Anastasia Klimchuk, Angel Pons, Martin L Roth, Patrick Georgi, Peter Marheine, Stefan Reinauer, Thomas Heijligen.
Carl-Daniel Hailfinger has posted comments on this change. ( https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/76455?usp=email )
Change subject: doc: Add code of conduct
......................................................................
Patch Set 3: Code-Review-2
(1 comment)
Patchset:
PS2:
> also added CB:75554 , it is already approved.
It is approved in coreboot code review, but not merged in coreboot (unresolved comments). This would make our code of conduct more strict than the code of conduct of coreboot.
It would even make our code of conduct one of the strictest codes of conduct out there. Quick googling didn't find any similar clauses on other FOSS projects.
To quote that clause: "Threatening or starting legal action against the project, sibling projects hosted on coreboot.org infrastructure, project or infrastructure
maintainers leads to an immediate ban from coreboot.org and related
systems."
--
To view, visit https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/76455?usp=email
To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit https://review.coreboot.org/settings
Gerrit-Project: flashrom
Gerrit-Branch: master
Gerrit-Change-Id: Ic4c646bc47d5db4d064a411d60a44f16559dfcee
Gerrit-Change-Number: 76455
Gerrit-PatchSet: 3
Gerrit-Owner: Anastasia Klimchuk <aklm(a)chromium.org>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Alexander Goncharov <chat(a)joursoir.net>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Angel Pons <th3fanbus(a)gmail.com>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Carl-Daniel Hailfinger <c-d.hailfinger.devel.2006(a)gmx.net>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Peter Marheine <pmarheine(a)chromium.org>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Stefan Reinauer <stefan.reinauer(a)coreboot.org>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Thomas Heijligen <src(a)posteo.de>
Gerrit-Reviewer: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply(a)coreboot.org>
Gerrit-CC: Martin L Roth <gaumless(a)gmail.com>
Gerrit-CC: Patrick Georgi <patrick(a)coreboot.org>
Gerrit-Attention: Patrick Georgi <patrick(a)coreboot.org>
Gerrit-Attention: Martin L Roth <gaumless(a)gmail.com>
Gerrit-Attention: Stefan Reinauer <stefan.reinauer(a)coreboot.org>
Gerrit-Attention: Thomas Heijligen <src(a)posteo.de>
Gerrit-Attention: Angel Pons <th3fanbus(a)gmail.com>
Gerrit-Attention: Anastasia Klimchuk <aklm(a)chromium.org>
Gerrit-Attention: Peter Marheine <pmarheine(a)chromium.org>
Gerrit-Attention: Alexander Goncharov <chat(a)joursoir.net>
Gerrit-Comment-Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2023 01:26:23 +0000
Gerrit-HasComments: Yes
Gerrit-Has-Labels: Yes
Comment-In-Reply-To: Patrick Georgi <patrick(a)coreboot.org>
Comment-In-Reply-To: Anastasia Klimchuk <aklm(a)chromium.org>
Comment-In-Reply-To: Peter Marheine <pmarheine(a)chromium.org>
Gerrit-MessageType: comment