April 2022 - flashrom-gerrit - mail.coreboot.org

Change in flashrom[master]: tests: Mark all static functions as static
by Anastasia Klimchuk (Code Review) 12 Apr '22

12 Apr '22

Anastasia Klimchuk has uploaded this change for review. ( https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/63571 ) Change subject: tests: Mark all static functions as static ...................................................................... tests: Mark all static functions as static Part 1 of fixing -Wmissing-prototypes warnings. This patch is adding static to all functions which are actually static. This fixes the warnings like this: warning: no previous prototype for ‘function_name’ [-Wmissing-prototypes] This patch is needed to sync compiler warning options between meson and makefile. TEST=running the following produces no warnings: meson setup --wipe (to clean build directory) ninja test Change-Id: Ic54da5ac1b2a46f55e3e3bee4ed952bdf59e8444 Signed-off-by: Anastasia Klimchuk <aklm(a)chromium.org> --- M tests/chip.c M tests/lifecycle.c 2 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-) git pull ssh://review.coreboot.org:29418/flashrom refs/changes/71/63571/1 diff --git a/tests/chip.c b/tests/chip.c index fe12533..fe29901 100644 --- a/tests/chip.c +++ b/tests/chip.c @@ -46,7 +46,7 @@ .buf = { 0 }, }; -int read_chip(struct flashctx *flash, uint8_t *buf, unsigned int start, unsigned int len) +static int read_chip(struct flashctx *flash, uint8_t *buf, unsigned int start, unsigned int len) { printf("Read chip called with start=0x%x, len=0x%x\n", start, len); if (!g_chip_state.unlock_calls) { @@ -60,7 +60,7 @@ return 0; } -int write_chip(struct flashctx *flash, const uint8_t *buf, unsigned int start, unsigned int len) +static int write_chip(struct flashctx *flash, const uint8_t *buf, unsigned int start, unsigned int len) { printf("Write chip called with start=0x%x, len=0x%x\n", start, len); if (!g_chip_state.unlock_calls) { @@ -74,7 +74,7 @@ return 0; } -int unlock_chip(struct flashctx *flash) +static int unlock_chip(struct flashctx *flash) { printf("Unlock chip called\n"); g_chip_state.unlock_calls++; @@ -87,7 +87,7 @@ return 0; } -int block_erase_chip(struct flashctx *flash, unsigned int blockaddr, unsigned int blocklen) +static int block_erase_chip(struct flashctx *flash, unsigned int blockaddr, unsigned int blocklen) { printf("Block erase called with blockaddr=0x%x, blocklen=0x%x\n", blockaddr, blocklen); if (!g_chip_state.unlock_calls) { @@ -352,7 +352,7 @@ free(newcontents); } -size_t verify_chip_fread(void *state, void *buf, size_t size, size_t len, FILE *fp) +static size_t verify_chip_fread(void *state, void *buf, size_t size, size_t len, FILE *fp) { /* * Verify operation compares contents of the file vs contents on the chip. diff --git a/tests/lifecycle.c b/tests/lifecycle.c index 5566b3b..c1f0cba 100644 --- a/tests/lifecycle.c +++ b/tests/lifecycle.c @@ -198,13 +198,13 @@ #endif } -int dediprog_libusb_init(void *state, libusb_context **ctx) +static int dediprog_libusb_init(void *state, libusb_context **ctx) { *ctx = not_null(); return 0; } -int dediprog_libusb_control_transfer(void *state, +static int dediprog_libusb_control_transfer(void *state, libusb_device_handle *devh, uint8_t bmRequestType, uint8_t bRequest, @@ -243,7 +243,7 @@ char *fopen_path; }; -FILE *linux_mtd_fopen(void *state, const char *pathname, const char *mode) +static FILE *linux_mtd_fopen(void *state, const char *pathname, const char *mode) { struct linux_mtd_io_state *io_state = state; @@ -252,7 +252,7 @@ return not_null(); } -size_t linux_mtd_fread(void *state, void *buf, size_t size, size_t len, FILE *fp) +static size_t linux_mtd_fread(void *state, void *buf, size_t size, size_t len, FILE *fp) { struct linux_mtd_fread_mock_entry { const char *path; @@ -286,7 +286,7 @@ return 0; } -int linux_mtd_fclose(void *state, FILE *fp) +static int linux_mtd_fclose(void *state, FILE *fp) { struct linux_mtd_io_state *io_state = state; @@ -340,7 +340,7 @@ return 0; } -char *linux_spi_fgets(void *state, char *buf, int len, FILE *fp) +static char *linux_spi_fgets(void *state, char *buf, int len, FILE *fp) { /* Emulate reading max buffer size from sysfs. */ const char *max_buf_size = "1048576"; -- To view, visit https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/63571 To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit https://review.coreboot.org/settings Gerrit-Project: flashrom Gerrit-Branch: master Gerrit-Change-Id: Ic54da5ac1b2a46f55e3e3bee4ed952bdf59e8444 Gerrit-Change-Number: 63571 Gerrit-PatchSet: 1 Gerrit-Owner: Anastasia Klimchuk <aklm(a)chromium.org> Gerrit-MessageType: newchange

1 0

Change in flashrom[master]: Add -W options from Makefile into meson warning_flags
by Anastasia Klimchuk (Code Review) 12 Apr '22

12 Apr '22

Attention is currently required from: Anastasia Klimchuk. Hello build bot (Jenkins), Thomas Heijligen, Angel Pons, I'd like you to reexamine a change. Please visit https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/58561 to look at the new patch set (#3). Change subject: Add -W options from Makefile into meson warning_flags ...................................................................... Add -W options from Makefile into meson warning_flags Makefile options were more restrictive and produced more warnings. This patch adds missing warning options into meson build. warning_level=2 means -Wall and -Wextra as it is set in Makefile. warning_level info: https://github.com/mesonbuild/meson/issues/3275 There are few warning options that are present in meson, but not in Makefile. These are left as is. TEST=ninja test shows no warnings and tests pass Change-Id: Id401bfd642dc3c13d85bd9a2dba56ada38714c25 Signed-off-by: Anastasia Klimchuk <aklm(a)chromium.org> --- M meson.build 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) git pull ssh://review.coreboot.org:29418/flashrom refs/changes/61/58561/3 -- To view, visit https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/58561 To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit https://review.coreboot.org/settings Gerrit-Project: flashrom Gerrit-Branch: master Gerrit-Change-Id: Id401bfd642dc3c13d85bd9a2dba56ada38714c25 Gerrit-Change-Number: 58561 Gerrit-PatchSet: 3 Gerrit-Owner: Anastasia Klimchuk <aklm(a)chromium.org> Gerrit-Reviewer: Angel Pons <th3fanbus(a)gmail.com> Gerrit-Reviewer: Thomas Heijligen <src(a)posteo.de> Gerrit-Reviewer: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply(a)coreboot.org> Gerrit-CC: Felix Singer <felixsinger(a)posteo.net> Gerrit-CC: Nico Huber <nico.h(a)gmx.de> Gerrit-CC: Peter Marheine <pmarheine(a)chromium.org> Gerrit-Attention: Anastasia Klimchuk <aklm(a)chromium.org> Gerrit-MessageType: newpatchset

1 0

Change in flashrom[master]: tests: Add and include headers with function prototypes
by Anastasia Klimchuk (Code Review) 12 Apr '22

12 Apr '22

Attention is currently required from: Edward O'Callaghan, Angel Pons, Anastasia Klimchuk. Hello build bot (Jenkins), Thomas Heijligen, Edward O'Callaghan, Angel Pons, I'd like you to reexamine a change. Please visit https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/63489 to look at the new patch set (#2). Change subject: tests: Add and include headers with function prototypes ...................................................................... tests: Add and include headers with function prototypes Part 2 of fixing -Wmissing-prototypes warnings. This patch adds headers with function prototypes and includes the headers into source files. This fixes the warnings like this: warning: no previous prototype for ‘function_name’ [-Wmissing-prototypes] This patch is needed to sync compiler warning options between meson and makefile. TEST=running the following produces no warnings: meson setup --wipe (to clean build directory) ninja test Change-Id: Ia1ff22deb2354569f277649c6575ef2d5ffbb6e0 Signed-off-by: Anastasia Klimchuk <aklm(a)chromium.org> --- M tests/chip.c M tests/flashrom.c M tests/helpers.c M tests/layout.c M tests/libusb_wraps.c A tests/libusb_wraps.h M tests/lifecycle.c M tests/spi25.c M tests/tests.c A tests/wraps.h 10 files changed, 126 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) git pull ssh://review.coreboot.org:29418/flashrom refs/changes/89/63489/2 -- To view, visit https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/63489 To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit https://review.coreboot.org/settings Gerrit-Project: flashrom Gerrit-Branch: master Gerrit-Change-Id: Ia1ff22deb2354569f277649c6575ef2d5ffbb6e0 Gerrit-Change-Number: 63489 Gerrit-PatchSet: 2 Gerrit-Owner: Anastasia Klimchuk <aklm(a)chromium.org> Gerrit-Reviewer: Angel Pons <th3fanbus(a)gmail.com> Gerrit-Reviewer: Edward O'Callaghan <quasisec(a)chromium.org> Gerrit-Reviewer: Thomas Heijligen <src(a)posteo.de> Gerrit-Reviewer: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply(a)coreboot.org> Gerrit-CC: Felix Singer <felixsinger(a)posteo.net> Gerrit-CC: Nico Huber <nico.h(a)gmx.de> Gerrit-CC: Peter Marheine <pmarheine(a)chromium.org> Gerrit-Attention: Edward O'Callaghan <quasisec(a)chromium.org> Gerrit-Attention: Angel Pons <th3fanbus(a)gmail.com> Gerrit-Attention: Anastasia Klimchuk <aklm(a)chromium.org> Gerrit-MessageType: newpatchset

1 0

Change in flashrom[master]: ich_descriptors_tool: Fix -Wsign-compare warnings
by Anastasia Klimchuk (Code Review) 12 Apr '22

12 Apr '22

Attention is currently required from: Felix Singer, Thomas Heijligen, Angel Pons, Anastasia Klimchuk. Hello build bot (Jenkins), Subrata Banik, Thomas Heijligen, I'd like you to reexamine a change. Please visit https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/63488 to look at the new patch set (#2). Change subject: ich_descriptors_tool: Fix -Wsign-compare warnings ...................................................................... ich_descriptors_tool: Fix -Wsign-compare warnings This patch is fixing -Wsign-compare warnings, specifically: warning: comparison of integer expressions of different signedness: ‘int’ and ‘uint32_t’ {aka ‘unsigned int’} [-Wsign-compare] Both instances in this patch produce the same warning. The patch is needed to sync compiler warning options between meson and makefile. TEST=running the following gives no warnings: meson setup --wipe (to clean build directory) ninja test Change-Id: I1f9325e9cf89f57f18d63cc3906a0958b47286d7 Signed-off-by: Anastasia Klimchuk <aklm(a)chromium.org> --- M util/ich_descriptors_tool/ich_descriptors_tool.c 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) git pull ssh://review.coreboot.org:29418/flashrom refs/changes/88/63488/2 -- To view, visit https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/63488 To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit https://review.coreboot.org/settings Gerrit-Project: flashrom Gerrit-Branch: master Gerrit-Change-Id: I1f9325e9cf89f57f18d63cc3906a0958b47286d7 Gerrit-Change-Number: 63488 Gerrit-PatchSet: 2 Gerrit-Owner: Anastasia Klimchuk <aklm(a)chromium.org> Gerrit-Reviewer: Subrata Banik <subratabanik(a)google.com> Gerrit-Reviewer: Thomas Heijligen <src(a)posteo.de> Gerrit-Reviewer: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply(a)coreboot.org> Gerrit-CC: Angel Pons <th3fanbus(a)gmail.com> Gerrit-CC: Felix Singer <felixsinger(a)posteo.net> Gerrit-CC: Nico Huber <nico.h(a)gmx.de> Gerrit-CC: Peter Marheine <pmarheine(a)chromium.org> Gerrit-Attention: Felix Singer <felixsinger(a)posteo.net> Gerrit-Attention: Thomas Heijligen <src(a)posteo.de> Gerrit-Attention: Angel Pons <th3fanbus(a)gmail.com> Gerrit-Attention: Anastasia Klimchuk <aklm(a)chromium.org> Gerrit-MessageType: newpatchset

1 0

Change in flashrom[master]: cli_classic: add writeprotect CLI
by Edward O'Callaghan (Code Review) 12 Apr '22

12 Apr '22

Attention is currently required from: Nico Huber, Paul Menzel, Angel Pons, Nikolai Artemiev, Sergii Dmytruk. Edward O'Callaghan has posted comments on this change. ( https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/58738 ) Change subject: cli_classic: add writeprotect CLI ...................................................................... Patch Set 77: Code-Review+2 -- To view, visit https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/58738 To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit https://review.coreboot.org/settings Gerrit-Project: flashrom Gerrit-Branch: master Gerrit-Change-Id: I499f521781ee8999921996517802c0c0c641d869 Gerrit-Change-Number: 58738 Gerrit-PatchSet: 77 Gerrit-Owner: Nikolai Artemiev <nartemiev(a)google.com> Gerrit-Reviewer: Anastasia Klimchuk <aklm(a)chromium.org> Gerrit-Reviewer: Angel Pons <th3fanbus(a)gmail.com> Gerrit-Reviewer: Edward O'Callaghan <quasisec(a)chromium.org> Gerrit-Reviewer: Nico Huber <nico.h(a)gmx.de> Gerrit-Reviewer: Paul Menzel <paulepanter(a)mailbox.org> Gerrit-Reviewer: Sergii Dmytruk <sergii.dmytruk(a)3mdeb.com> Gerrit-Reviewer: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply(a)coreboot.org> Gerrit-Attention: Nico Huber <nico.h(a)gmx.de> Gerrit-Attention: Paul Menzel <paulepanter(a)mailbox.org> Gerrit-Attention: Angel Pons <th3fanbus(a)gmail.com> Gerrit-Attention: Nikolai Artemiev <nartemiev(a)google.com> Gerrit-Attention: Sergii Dmytruk <sergii.dmytruk(a)3mdeb.com> Gerrit-Comment-Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2022 02:27:26 +0000 Gerrit-HasComments: No Gerrit-Has-Labels: Yes Gerrit-MessageType: comment

1 0

Change in flashrom[master]: ich_descriptors.c: Ensure unsigned types >=0 on to prevent underflow
by Anastasia Klimchuk (Code Review) 12 Apr '22

12 Apr '22

Anastasia Klimchuk has posted comments on this change. ( https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/62764 ) Change subject: ich_descriptors.c: Ensure unsigned types >=0 on to prevent underflow ...................................................................... Patch Set 18: (1 comment) Commit Message: https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/62764/comment/95fb59b3_6fee4647 PS18, Line 11: this value for left shifting could be even more dangerous. > Just for future commits. If the nature of the patch changes during […] I was looking at commit message yesterday and thought about it. It still seemed okay to me for the latest patchset. Sorry if that was a mistake! I was thinking, the left shifting is still there, and generic statement about undefined behaviour still seems relevant? One thing has changed for me during review: in the beginning I thought there might be a possible error. But then I realised there was no error, but the code looked like there could be. -- To view, visit https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/62764 To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit https://review.coreboot.org/settings Gerrit-Project: flashrom Gerrit-Branch: master Gerrit-Change-Id: I5921cc571f3dca5188ca1973dba6ececbcbe2f39 Gerrit-Change-Number: 62764 Gerrit-PatchSet: 18 Gerrit-Owner: Light <aarya.chaumal(a)gmail.com> Gerrit-Reviewer: Anastasia Klimchuk <aklm(a)chromium.org> Gerrit-Reviewer: Angel Pons <th3fanbus(a)gmail.com> Gerrit-Reviewer: Edward O'Callaghan <quasisec(a)chromium.org> Gerrit-Reviewer: Nico Huber <nico.h(a)gmx.de> Gerrit-Reviewer: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply(a)coreboot.org> Gerrit-CC: Paul Menzel <paulepanter(a)mailbox.org> Gerrit-Comment-Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2022 02:15:13 +0000 Gerrit-HasComments: Yes Gerrit-Has-Labels: No Comment-In-Reply-To: Nico Huber <nico.h(a)gmx.de> Gerrit-MessageType: comment

1 0

Change in flashrom[master]: sb600spi.c: Use SPI100 bit mappings
by Idwer Vollering (Code Review) 12 Apr '22

12 Apr '22

Idwer Vollering has submitted this change. ( https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/63422 ) Change subject: sb600spi.c: Use SPI100 bit mappings ...................................................................... sb600spi.c: Use SPI100 bit mappings On AMD SoCs that use SPI100 engine, flashrom has been using legacy spi100 register and bit mappings when programming the engine - specifically when programming the opcode and triggering their execution. --------------------------------------------------------------------- | Register Name | Legacy SPI100 mapping | Updated SPI100 mapping | |---------------|------------------------|--------------------------| | Opcode | Offset 0 from SPI BAR | Offset 0x45 from SPI BAR | | | Bits 0:7 | Bits 0:7 | |---------------|------------------------|--------------------------| | Execute Cmd | Offset 2 from SPI BAR | Offset 0x47 from SPI BAR | | | Bit 1 | Bit 7 | --------------------------------------------------------------------- These legacy register mappings are removed in upcoming generations of AMD SoCs. Stop using the legacy spi100 registers. For more details about SPI100 refer to document: 56569-A1 Rev 3.01 BUG=b:228238107 TEST=Build and deploy flashrom in Skyrim. Ensure that flashrom is able to detect the SPI ROM chip, read from it and write to it successfully. Ran flashrom_tester on Dewatt (Cezanne SoC), Dalboz (Picasso SoC) successfully and ensured that all the tests passed. Change-Id: If42130757331f4294b5a42c848557d3287f24fc3 Signed-off-by: Karthikeyan Ramasubramanian <kramasub(a)google.com> Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/63422 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply(a)coreboot.org> Reviewed-by: Felix Held <felix-coreboot(a)felixheld.de> Reviewed-by: Raul Rangel <rrangel(a)chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus(a)gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Edward O'Callaghan <quasisec(a)chromium.org> --- M sb600spi.c 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) Approvals: build bot (Jenkins): Verified Felix Held: Looks good to me, approved Raul Rangel: Looks good to me, approved Angel Pons: Looks good to me, but someone else must approve Edward O'Callaghan: Looks good to me, approved diff --git a/sb600spi.c b/sb600spi.c index 6f8cc40..b1e140b 100644 --- a/sb600spi.c +++ b/sb600spi.c @@ -53,6 +53,10 @@ #define FIFO_SIZE_OLD 8 #define FIFO_SIZE_YANGTZE 71 +#define SPI100_CMD_CODE_REG 0x45 +#define SPI100_CMD_TRIGGER_REG 0x47 +#define SPI100_EXECUTE_CMD (1 << 7) + struct sb600spi_data { struct flashctx *flash; uint8_t *spibar; @@ -200,6 +204,16 @@ msg_pspew("done\n"); } +static void execute_spi100_command(uint8_t *sb600_spibar) +{ + msg_pspew("Executing... "); + mmio_writeb(mmio_readb(sb600_spibar + SPI100_CMD_TRIGGER_REG) | SPI100_EXECUTE_CMD, + sb600_spibar + SPI100_CMD_TRIGGER_REG); + while (mmio_readb(sb600_spibar + SPI100_CMD_TRIGGER_REG) & SPI100_CMD_TRIGGER_REG) + ; + msg_pspew("done\n"); +} + static int sb600_spi_send_command(const struct flashctx *flash, unsigned int writecnt, unsigned int readcnt, const unsigned char *writearr, @@ -299,7 +313,7 @@ unsigned char cmd = *writearr++; writecnt--; msg_pspew("%s, cmd=0x%02x, writecnt=%d, readcnt=%d\n", __func__, cmd, writecnt, readcnt); - mmio_writeb(cmd, sb600_spibar + 0); + mmio_writeb(cmd, sb600_spibar + SPI100_CMD_CODE_REG); int ret = check_readwritecnt(flash, writecnt, readcnt); if (ret != 0) @@ -317,7 +331,7 @@ } msg_pspew("\n"); - execute_command(sb600_spibar); + execute_spi100_command(sb600_spibar); msg_pspew("Reading buffer: "); for (count = 0; count < readcnt; count++) { -- To view, visit https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/63422 To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit https://review.coreboot.org/settings Gerrit-Project: flashrom Gerrit-Branch: master Gerrit-Change-Id: If42130757331f4294b5a42c848557d3287f24fc3 Gerrit-Change-Number: 63422 Gerrit-PatchSet: 4 Gerrit-Owner: Karthik Ramasubramanian <kramasub(a)google.com> Gerrit-Reviewer: Angel Pons <th3fanbus(a)gmail.com> Gerrit-Reviewer: Edward O'Callaghan <quasisec(a)chromium.org> Gerrit-Reviewer: Felix Held <felix-coreboot(a)felixheld.de> Gerrit-Reviewer: Idwer Vollering <vidwer(a)gmail.com> Gerrit-Reviewer: Jon Murphy <jpmurphy(a)google.com> Gerrit-Reviewer: Raul Rangel <rrangel(a)chromium.org> Gerrit-Reviewer: Robert Zieba <robertzieba(a)google.com> Gerrit-Reviewer: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply(a)coreboot.org> Gerrit-CC: Karthikeyan Ramasubramanian <kramasub(a)chromium.org> Gerrit-CC: Nico Huber <nico.h(a)gmx.de> Gerrit-CC: Paul Menzel <paulepanter(a)mailbox.org> Gerrit-MessageType: merged

1 0

Change in flashrom[master]: flashrom.8.tmpl: Add raiden_debug_spi doc entry
by Anastasia Klimchuk (Code Review) 12 Apr '22

12 Apr '22

Attention is currently required from: Felix Singer, Nico Huber, Martin Roth, Edward O'Callaghan, Angel Pons, Nikolai Artemiev. Anastasia Klimchuk has posted comments on this change. ( https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/62768 ) Change subject: flashrom.8.tmpl: Add raiden_debug_spi doc entry ...................................................................... Patch Set 4: Code-Review+1 -- To view, visit https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/62768 To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit https://review.coreboot.org/settings Gerrit-Project: flashrom Gerrit-Branch: master Gerrit-Change-Id: I186920006bdfcc7a9f89542f84b452dfc72b18e4 Gerrit-Change-Number: 62768 Gerrit-PatchSet: 4 Gerrit-Owner: Edward O'Callaghan <quasisec(a)chromium.org> Gerrit-Reviewer: Anastasia Klimchuk <aklm(a)chromium.org> Gerrit-Reviewer: Angel Pons <th3fanbus(a)gmail.com> Gerrit-Reviewer: Martin Roth <martinroth(a)google.com> Gerrit-Reviewer: Nikolai Artemiev <nartemiev(a)google.com> Gerrit-Reviewer: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply(a)coreboot.org> Gerrit-CC: Felix Singer <felixsinger(a)posteo.net> Gerrit-CC: Nico Huber <nico.h(a)gmx.de> Gerrit-CC: Paul Menzel <paulepanter(a)mailbox.org> Gerrit-Attention: Felix Singer <felixsinger(a)posteo.net> Gerrit-Attention: Nico Huber <nico.h(a)gmx.de> Gerrit-Attention: Martin Roth <martinroth(a)google.com> Gerrit-Attention: Edward O'Callaghan <quasisec(a)chromium.org> Gerrit-Attention: Angel Pons <th3fanbus(a)gmail.com> Gerrit-Attention: Nikolai Artemiev <nartemiev(a)google.com> Gerrit-Comment-Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2022 01:13:52 +0000 Gerrit-HasComments: No Gerrit-Has-Labels: Yes Gerrit-MessageType: comment

1 0

Change in flashrom[master]: tests/: Add file path and flags validation to open() calls
by Anastasia Klimchuk (Code Review) 12 Apr '22

12 Apr '22

Attention is currently required from: Sam McNally, Edward O'Callaghan, Daniel Campello. Anastasia Klimchuk has posted comments on this change. ( https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/62320 ) Change subject: tests/: Add file path and flags validation to open() calls ...................................................................... Patch Set 16: Code-Review+2 -- To view, visit https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/62320 To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit https://review.coreboot.org/settings Gerrit-Project: flashrom Gerrit-Branch: master Gerrit-Change-Id: I892fa1ecee26ebce9640893edbb228fa9aa7b0b6 Gerrit-Change-Number: 62320 Gerrit-PatchSet: 16 Gerrit-Owner: Edward O'Callaghan <quasisec(a)chromium.org> Gerrit-Reviewer: Anastasia Klimchuk <aklm(a)chromium.org> Gerrit-Reviewer: Daniel Campello <campello(a)chromium.org> Gerrit-Reviewer: Sam McNally <sammc(a)google.com> Gerrit-Reviewer: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply(a)coreboot.org> Gerrit-CC: Paul Menzel <paulepanter(a)mailbox.org> Gerrit-Attention: Sam McNally <sammc(a)google.com> Gerrit-Attention: Edward O'Callaghan <quasisec(a)chromium.org> Gerrit-Attention: Daniel Campello <campello(a)chromium.org> Gerrit-Comment-Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2022 00:49:50 +0000 Gerrit-HasComments: No Gerrit-Has-Labels: Yes Gerrit-MessageType: comment

1 0

Change in flashrom[master]: tests/lifecycle.c: Deduce out io-setup-teardown do-pattern
by Anastasia Klimchuk (Code Review) 12 Apr '22

12 Apr '22

Attention is currently required from: Edward O'Callaghan, Daniel Campello. Anastasia Klimchuk has posted comments on this change. ( https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/63231 ) Change subject: tests/lifecycle.c: Deduce out io-setup-teardown do-pattern ...................................................................... Patch Set 3: Code-Review+2 -- To view, visit https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/63231 To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit https://review.coreboot.org/settings Gerrit-Project: flashrom Gerrit-Branch: master Gerrit-Change-Id: Icc00acd980a027337acb079f5afc3cccdfe4c765 Gerrit-Change-Number: 63231 Gerrit-PatchSet: 3 Gerrit-Owner: Edward O'Callaghan <quasisec(a)chromium.org> Gerrit-Reviewer: Anastasia Klimchuk <aklm(a)chromium.org> Gerrit-Reviewer: Daniel Campello <campello(a)chromium.org> Gerrit-Reviewer: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply(a)coreboot.org> Gerrit-CC: Paul Menzel <paulepanter(a)mailbox.org> Gerrit-Attention: Edward O'Callaghan <quasisec(a)chromium.org> Gerrit-Attention: Daniel Campello <campello(a)chromium.org> Gerrit-Comment-Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2022 00:43:18 +0000 Gerrit-HasComments: No Gerrit-Has-Labels: Yes Gerrit-MessageType: comment

1 0

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

flashrom-gerrit April 2022