Attention is currently required from: Tim Crawford, Michał Żygowski.
Nico Huber has posted comments on this change. ( https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/55578 )
Change subject: Add Tiger Lake U Premium support
......................................................................
Patch Set 12:
(1 comment)
Patchset:
PS12:
> I'll try if Gerrit can rebase it.
Nope, looks like it needs some manual work :-/
--
To view, visit https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/55578
To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit https://review.coreboot.org/settings
Gerrit-Project: flashrom
Gerrit-Branch: master
Gerrit-Change-Id: I28f3b6fe9f8ce9e976a6808683f46b6f4ec72bdd
Gerrit-Change-Number: 55578
Gerrit-PatchSet: 12
Gerrit-Owner: Michał Żygowski <michal.zygowski(a)3mdeb.com>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Angel Pons <th3fanbus(a)gmail.com>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Nico Huber <nico.h(a)gmx.de>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Tim Crawford <tcrawford(a)system76.com>
Gerrit-Reviewer: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply(a)coreboot.org>
Gerrit-CC: Paul Menzel <paulepanter(a)mailbox.org>
Gerrit-Attention: Tim Crawford <tcrawford(a)system76.com>
Gerrit-Attention: Michał Żygowski <michal.zygowski(a)3mdeb.com>
Gerrit-Comment-Date: Mon, 01 Nov 2021 13:32:36 +0000
Gerrit-HasComments: Yes
Gerrit-Has-Labels: No
Comment-In-Reply-To: Tim Crawford <tcrawford(a)system76.com>
Comment-In-Reply-To: Nico Huber <nico.h(a)gmx.de>
Gerrit-MessageType: comment
Attention is currently required from: Tim Crawford, Michał Żygowski.
Nico Huber has posted comments on this change. ( https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/55578 )
Change subject: Add Tiger Lake U Premium support
......................................................................
Patch Set 12:
(1 comment)
Patchset:
PS12:
> This doesn't seem to depend on the other commits in the chain. […]
I'll try if Gerrit can rebase it.
--
To view, visit https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/55578
To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit https://review.coreboot.org/settings
Gerrit-Project: flashrom
Gerrit-Branch: master
Gerrit-Change-Id: I28f3b6fe9f8ce9e976a6808683f46b6f4ec72bdd
Gerrit-Change-Number: 55578
Gerrit-PatchSet: 12
Gerrit-Owner: Michał Żygowski <michal.zygowski(a)3mdeb.com>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Angel Pons <th3fanbus(a)gmail.com>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Nico Huber <nico.h(a)gmx.de>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Tim Crawford <tcrawford(a)system76.com>
Gerrit-Reviewer: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply(a)coreboot.org>
Gerrit-CC: Paul Menzel <paulepanter(a)mailbox.org>
Gerrit-Attention: Tim Crawford <tcrawford(a)system76.com>
Gerrit-Attention: Michał Żygowski <michal.zygowski(a)3mdeb.com>
Gerrit-Comment-Date: Mon, 01 Nov 2021 13:31:35 +0000
Gerrit-HasComments: Yes
Gerrit-Has-Labels: No
Comment-In-Reply-To: Tim Crawford <tcrawford(a)system76.com>
Gerrit-MessageType: comment
Attention is currently required from: Nikolai Artemiev.
Sergii Dmytruk has posted comments on this change. ( https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/58481 )
Change subject: [RFC] writeprotect: implement wp_get_ranges()
......................................................................
Patch Set 6:
(1 comment)
File writeprotect.h:
https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/58481/comment/fb6f127c_0105c6f5
PS6, Line 57: wp_get_ranges
> I previously had wp_get_available_ranges() but thought it was a bit too long. […]
"get_range_list" is better than "get_ranges", but still might suggest multiple ranges rather than a list of possible values. Other suggestions: wp_get_range_values(), wp_allowed_ranges().
--
To view, visit https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/58481
To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit https://review.coreboot.org/settings
Gerrit-Project: flashrom
Gerrit-Branch: master
Gerrit-Change-Id: Id51f038f03305c8536d80313e52f77d27835f34d
Gerrit-Change-Number: 58481
Gerrit-PatchSet: 6
Gerrit-Owner: Nikolai Artemiev <nartemiev(a)google.com>
Gerrit-Reviewer: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply(a)coreboot.org>
Gerrit-CC: Paul Menzel <paulepanter(a)mailbox.org>
Gerrit-CC: Sergii Dmytruk <sergii.dmytruk(a)3mdeb.com>
Gerrit-Attention: Nikolai Artemiev <nartemiev(a)google.com>
Gerrit-Comment-Date: Mon, 01 Nov 2021 13:28:52 +0000
Gerrit-HasComments: Yes
Gerrit-Has-Labels: No
Comment-In-Reply-To: Nikolai Artemiev <nartemiev(a)google.com>
Comment-In-Reply-To: Sergii Dmytruk <sergii.dmytruk(a)3mdeb.com>
Gerrit-MessageType: comment
Attention is currently required from: Nikolai Artemiev.
Nico Huber has posted comments on this change. ( https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/58482 )
Change subject: [RFC] writeprotect: implement wp_{get,set}_range()
......................................................................
Patch Set 6:
(1 comment)
Patchset:
PS6:
> > I guess a separate tool that handles only block protection (or write > protection or flash configuration in general) would be much easier to maintain.
>
> I think you mean building a separate binary from common sources right?
Right, nothing else makes sense, IMO :)
> I'm fine with building a separate binary, though I think we would need to be careful about how we partition the functionality to avoid feature duplication.
I think the first sentence of flashrom's manpage provides a reasonable
scope for one binary:
"flashrom is a utility for detecting, reading, writing, verifying and
erasing flash chips."
I guess one could even argue that this is already too much. But that's
what it always was, and it seems convenient enough. ;)
For future binaries, I would just use the smallest set of functions
that overlap somehow. For instance in flashrom, `writing` overlaps
with all the other functions. We could start a new binary for the
configuration of write protection, and then only add there what
overlaps with write protection (ATM, nothing comes to my mind).
>
> > I would much prefer to only call libflashrom functions from any CLI code.
>
> I agree, I definitely want to move the writeprotect interface into libflashrom. I thought it would be easier to call the functions directly for now, but it shouldn't take too much work to squash writeprotect.h into libflashrom.h.
Sounds like a plan. However, for libflashrom, we should make sure
to get the abstraction right from the beginning. The API is not
considered stable, but I still wouldn't like to change too much
later on.
--
To view, visit https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/58482
To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit https://review.coreboot.org/settings
Gerrit-Project: flashrom
Gerrit-Branch: master
Gerrit-Change-Id: I7d26f43fb05c5828b9839bb57a28fa1088dcd9a0
Gerrit-Change-Number: 58482
Gerrit-PatchSet: 6
Gerrit-Owner: Nikolai Artemiev <nartemiev(a)google.com>
Gerrit-Reviewer: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply(a)coreboot.org>
Gerrit-CC: Nico Huber <nico.h(a)gmx.de>
Gerrit-CC: Paul Menzel <paulepanter(a)mailbox.org>
Gerrit-Attention: Nikolai Artemiev <nartemiev(a)google.com>
Gerrit-Comment-Date: Mon, 01 Nov 2021 12:48:08 +0000
Gerrit-HasComments: Yes
Gerrit-Has-Labels: No
Comment-In-Reply-To: Nico Huber <nico.h(a)gmx.de>
Comment-In-Reply-To: Nikolai Artemiev <nartemiev(a)google.com>
Gerrit-MessageType: comment
Attention is currently required from: Nico Huber.
Nikolai Artemiev has posted comments on this change. ( https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/58482 )
Change subject: [RFC] writeprotect: implement wp_{get,set}_range()
......................................................................
Patch Set 6:
(1 comment)
Patchset:
PS6:
> I guess a separate tool that handles only block protection (or write > protection or flash configuration in general) would be much easier to maintain.
I think you mean building a separate binary from common sources right? Splitting off an entirely separate project would be a lot of extra work, especially when read/write/erase operations need some of the same functionality (i.e. disabling block protection).
I'm fine with building a separate binary, though I think we would need to be careful about how we partition the functionality to avoid feature duplication.
> I would much prefer to only call libflashrom functions from any CLI code.
I agree, I definitely want to move the writeprotect interface into libflashrom. I thought it would be easier to call the functions directly for now, but it shouldn't take too much work to squash writeprotect.h into libflashrom.h.
--
To view, visit https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/58482
To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit https://review.coreboot.org/settings
Gerrit-Project: flashrom
Gerrit-Branch: master
Gerrit-Change-Id: I7d26f43fb05c5828b9839bb57a28fa1088dcd9a0
Gerrit-Change-Number: 58482
Gerrit-PatchSet: 6
Gerrit-Owner: Nikolai Artemiev <nartemiev(a)google.com>
Gerrit-Reviewer: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply(a)coreboot.org>
Gerrit-CC: Nico Huber <nico.h(a)gmx.de>
Gerrit-CC: Paul Menzel <paulepanter(a)mailbox.org>
Gerrit-Attention: Nico Huber <nico.h(a)gmx.de>
Gerrit-Comment-Date: Mon, 01 Nov 2021 10:24:17 +0000
Gerrit-HasComments: Yes
Gerrit-Has-Labels: No
Comment-In-Reply-To: Nico Huber <nico.h(a)gmx.de>
Gerrit-MessageType: comment
Attention is currently required from: melvyn2.
Angel Pons has posted comments on this change. ( https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/58774 )
Change subject: chipset_enable.c: Mark Intel Z390 as DEP
......................................................................
Patch Set 3: Code-Review+1
(3 comments)
Commit Message:
https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/58774/comment/e0771009_10192c29
PS3, Line 9: me_cleaner
Minor: Our guidelines state that commit message lines wrap at 72 characters [1]. `me_cleaner` goes past the limit, so it should go in a new line.
[1]: https://flashrom.org/Development_Guidelines#Commit_messagehttps://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/58774/comment/9611dc8c_d84dcd52
PS3, Line 12: melvyn2
As per our Sign-off procedure [1], I'm afraid you have to use your real name here.
[1]: https://flashrom.org/Development_Guidelines#Sign-off_Procedure
Patchset:
PS3:
Welcome! The change itself looks good, but the sign-off needs to be addressed.
--
To view, visit https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/58774
To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit https://review.coreboot.org/settings
Gerrit-Project: flashrom
Gerrit-Branch: master
Gerrit-Change-Id: If14d45c144bb32a1d1046185d4476ea29e4d0912
Gerrit-Change-Number: 58774
Gerrit-PatchSet: 3
Gerrit-Owner: melvyn2 <melvyn2(a)brcok.tk>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Angel Pons <th3fanbus(a)gmail.com>
Gerrit-Reviewer: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply(a)coreboot.org>
Gerrit-CC: Paul Menzel <paulepanter(a)mailbox.org>
Gerrit-Attention: melvyn2 <melvyn2(a)brcok.tk>
Gerrit-Comment-Date: Mon, 01 Nov 2021 09:27:05 +0000
Gerrit-HasComments: Yes
Gerrit-Has-Labels: Yes
Gerrit-MessageType: comment