Hello Stefan Tauner, Paul Menzel, build bot (Jenkins), Nico Huber,
I'd like you to reexamine a change. Please visit
https://review.coreboot.org/22116
to look at the new patch set (#2).
Change subject: Use bzip2 when making a tarball
......................................................................
Use bzip2 when making a tarball
Tarballs on download.flashrom.org are generally packaged using bzip2, so
we may as well be internally consistent.
Change-Id: Ib9fb1ea6d5994cd0285ce8db9675640fae992773
Signed-off-by: David Hendricks <dhendricks(a)fb.com>
---
M Makefile
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
git pull ssh://review.coreboot.org:29418/flashrom refs/changes/16/22116/2
--
To view, visit https://review.coreboot.org/22116
To unsubscribe, visit https://review.coreboot.org/settings
Gerrit-Project: flashrom
Gerrit-Branch: staging
Gerrit-MessageType: newpatchset
Gerrit-Change-Id: Ib9fb1ea6d5994cd0285ce8db9675640fae992773
Gerrit-Change-Number: 22116
Gerrit-PatchSet: 2
Gerrit-Owner: David Hendricks <david.hendricks(a)gmail.com>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Nico Huber <nico.h(a)gmx.de>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Paul Menzel <paulepanter(a)users.sourceforge.net>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Stefan Tauner <stefan.tauner(a)gmx.at>
Gerrit-Reviewer: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply(a)coreboot.org>
David Hendricks has posted comments on this change. ( https://review.coreboot.org/21935 )
Change subject: nicintel_eeprom: Reduce usage of is_i210()
......................................................................
Patch Set 2: Code-Review+2
Either way seems fine w/ me as well. It might be good to send a pull request to https://github.com/ribalda/flashrom to see what the author thinks.
--
To view, visit https://review.coreboot.org/21935
To unsubscribe, visit https://review.coreboot.org/settings
Gerrit-Project: flashrom
Gerrit-Branch: staging
Gerrit-MessageType: comment
Gerrit-Change-Id: I59164ccf54afbbd64a0598282d13e80ff7fd6fa4
Gerrit-Change-Number: 21935
Gerrit-PatchSet: 2
Gerrit-Owner: Nico Huber <nico.h(a)gmx.de>
Gerrit-Reviewer: David Hendricks <david.hendricks(a)gmail.com>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Nico Huber <nico.h(a)gmx.de>
Gerrit-Reviewer: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply(a)coreboot.org>
Gerrit-Comment-Date: Fri, 20 Oct 2017 18:57:41 +0000
Gerrit-HasComments: No
David Hendricks has posted comments on this change. ( https://review.coreboot.org/21934 )
Change subject: fixup! nicintel_eeprom: Support for I210 emulated EEprom
......................................................................
Patch Set 1: Code-Review+2
(1 comment)
https://review.coreboot.org/#/c/21934/1/nicintel_eeprom.c
File nicintel_eeprom.c:
https://review.coreboot.org/#/c/21934/1/nicintel_eeprom.c@106
PS1, Line 106: return (device_id & 0xfff0) == 0x1530;
> As this was supposed to be a fixup!, I tried to anticipate what
SGTM. As the file is written, your fixup! seems correct.
If needed we can follow-up with a patch to check for other possible device IDs - perhaps by checking more raw values here or by adding an enum to nics_intel_ee[] to indicate the device's family (I210, I82580, etc) and iterating thru.
--
To view, visit https://review.coreboot.org/21934
To unsubscribe, visit https://review.coreboot.org/settings
Gerrit-Project: flashrom
Gerrit-Branch: staging
Gerrit-MessageType: comment
Gerrit-Change-Id: I5d3f71e4e0f77cc8793e7f395baf69e1fad930a3
Gerrit-Change-Number: 21934
Gerrit-PatchSet: 1
Gerrit-Owner: Nico Huber <nico.h(a)gmx.de>
Gerrit-Reviewer: David Hendricks <david.hendricks(a)gmail.com>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Nico Huber <nico.h(a)gmx.de>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Stefan Tauner <stefan.tauner(a)gmx.at>
Gerrit-Reviewer: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply(a)coreboot.org>
Gerrit-Comment-Date: Fri, 20 Oct 2017 18:13:26 +0000
Gerrit-HasComments: Yes
Nico Huber has posted comments on this change. ( https://review.coreboot.org/21934 )
Change subject: fixup! nicintel_eeprom: Support for I210 emulated EEprom
......................................................................
Patch Set 1:
(1 comment)
https://review.coreboot.org/#/c/21934/1/nicintel_eeprom.c
File nicintel_eeprom.c:
https://review.coreboot.org/#/c/21934/1/nicintel_eeprom.c@106
PS1, Line 106: return (device_id & 0xfff0) == 0x1530;
> Are you sure about this? 0x157b and 0x157c seem valid in addition to 0x153x
As this was supposed to be a fixup!, I tried to anticipate what
the author intended. And, as the comment suggests, this is not
supposed to be future proof.
Anyway, `device_id >= 0x1530` should work as well (but doesn't
align with current nicintel_spi.c).
--
To view, visit https://review.coreboot.org/21934
To unsubscribe, visit https://review.coreboot.org/settings
Gerrit-Project: flashrom
Gerrit-Branch: staging
Gerrit-MessageType: comment
Gerrit-Change-Id: I5d3f71e4e0f77cc8793e7f395baf69e1fad930a3
Gerrit-Change-Number: 21934
Gerrit-PatchSet: 1
Gerrit-Owner: Nico Huber <nico.h(a)gmx.de>
Gerrit-Reviewer: David Hendricks <david.hendricks(a)gmail.com>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Nico Huber <nico.h(a)gmx.de>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Stefan Tauner <stefan.tauner(a)gmx.at>
Gerrit-Reviewer: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply(a)coreboot.org>
Gerrit-Comment-Date: Fri, 20 Oct 2017 15:19:12 +0000
Gerrit-HasComments: Yes