March 2022 - flashrom-gerrit - mail.coreboot.org

Change in flashrom[master]: tests: assert pathname and flags when calling open()
by Daniel Campello (Code Review) 31 Mar '22

31 Mar '22

Attention is currently required from: Edward O'Callaghan. Hello build bot (Jenkins), Edward O'Callaghan, I'd like you to reexamine a change. Please visit https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/63227 to look at the new patch set (#6). Change subject: tests: assert pathname and flags when calling open() ...................................................................... tests: assert pathname and flags when calling open() With this change the wrappers for mock and friends are able to take an optional io_mock_open_state struct to assert expected pathnames and flags whenever an open operation is called. Based partially on https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/62319/5 BUG=b:227404721,b:217629892,b:215255210 TEST=./test_build.sh; FEATURES=test emerge-amd64-generic flashrom BRANCH=none Signed-off-by: Daniel Campello <campello(a)chromium.org> Co-Author: Edward O'Callaghan <quasisec(a)google.com> Change-Id: Ib46ca5b854c8453ec02ae09f3151cd4d25f988eb --- M tests/io_mock.h M tests/lifecycle.c M tests/tests.c 3 files changed, 37 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-) git pull ssh://review.coreboot.org:29418/flashrom refs/changes/27/63227/6 -- To view, visit https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/63227 To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit https://review.coreboot.org/settings Gerrit-Project: flashrom Gerrit-Branch: master Gerrit-Change-Id: Ib46ca5b854c8453ec02ae09f3151cd4d25f988eb Gerrit-Change-Number: 63227 Gerrit-PatchSet: 6 Gerrit-Owner: Daniel Campello <campello(a)chromium.org> Gerrit-Reviewer: Edward O'Callaghan <quasisec(a)chromium.org> Gerrit-Reviewer: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply(a)coreboot.org> Gerrit-Attention: Edward O'Callaghan <quasisec(a)chromium.org> Gerrit-MessageType: newpatchset

1 0

Change in flashrom[master]: tests/: Allow for file path validation
by Daniel Campello (Code Review) 31 Mar '22

31 Mar '22

Attention is currently required from: Edward O'Callaghan, Anastasia Klimchuk. Daniel Campello has posted comments on this change. ( https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/62320 ) Change subject: tests/: Allow for file path validation ...................................................................... Patch Set 8: (5 comments) Commit Message: https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/62320/comment/f69d298b_8888475b PS4, Line 7: Allow for file path validation > I added some comments about commit messages in previous patches, this one would need to be aligned a […] Again, no multiple paths even when they are supported by the framework. File tests/init_shutdown.c: https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/62320/comment/12992ca2_a0c86ca4 PS4, Line 61: data > Why dummy needs mocks? This is unexpected [to me]. This is actually making sure that no open() calls are made. https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/62320/comment/cb76970d_d3c21b63 PS4, Line 80: data > Same comment as in previous patches: let's be more specific with naming and call this `nicrealtek_io […] Done https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/62320/comment/e19c58ea_5ef5005f PS4, Line 89: > Lets add new line before and after `io_mock_register` Done https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/62320/comment/b35a2d1b_9d12bac8 PS4, Line 90: > Since this test now registering io mock, it also needs to unregister, which is […] Done -- To view, visit https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/62320 To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit https://review.coreboot.org/settings Gerrit-Project: flashrom Gerrit-Branch: master Gerrit-Change-Id: I892fa1ecee26ebce9640893edbb228fa9aa7b0b6 Gerrit-Change-Number: 62320 Gerrit-PatchSet: 8 Gerrit-Owner: Edward O'Callaghan <quasisec(a)chromium.org> Gerrit-Reviewer: Anastasia Klimchuk <aklm(a)chromium.org> Gerrit-Reviewer: Daniel Campello <campello(a)chromium.org> Gerrit-Reviewer: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply(a)coreboot.org> Gerrit-CC: Paul Menzel <paulepanter(a)mailbox.org> Gerrit-Attention: Edward O'Callaghan <quasisec(a)chromium.org> Gerrit-Attention: Anastasia Klimchuk <aklm(a)chromium.org> Gerrit-Comment-Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2022 04:04:16 +0000 Gerrit-HasComments: Yes Gerrit-Has-Labels: No Comment-In-Reply-To: Anastasia Klimchuk <aklm(a)chromium.org> Gerrit-MessageType: comment

1 0

Change in flashrom[master]: tests/linux_spi: Validate param file path
by Daniel Campello (Code Review) 31 Mar '22

31 Mar '22

Attention is currently required from: Edward O'Callaghan, Anastasia Klimchuk. Daniel Campello has posted comments on this change. ( https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/62319 ) Change subject: tests/linux_spi: Validate param file path ...................................................................... Patch Set 8: (7 comments) Commit Message: https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/62319/comment/fe852565_a54d1f83 PS4, Line 7: Validate param file path > Sorry I missed in the first batch of comments. […] Even when the platform supports multiple paths (for multiple calls to open) here there is a single call with a single path. I think title is descriptive as is. https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/62319/comment/a8bdd83e_99e3dbfd PS4, Line 10: linux_spi unit-test does not : check > I think unit-tests in general had no implementation to mock repeated calls to open, it is not specif […] Done File tests/init_shutdown.c: https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/62319/comment/f674532d_e6cc0d60 PS4, Line 39: #define DEFAULT_MOCK_FD 0xC0FE > You can rebase on top of https://review.coreboot. […] Done https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/62319/comment/500d2b87_cdf3d152 PS4, Line 41: default_io_mock_state > I have rebased with 'fallback' instead. […] Ack https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/62319/comment/89a096a7_dbfbaa58 PS4, Line 48: default_open > For the same reasons as above, I would rename this to something more self-explanatory, maybe "multip […] Ack https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/62319/comment/52049d09_85732e28 PS4, Line 305: data > Ok, this is existing pattern that was reviewed and approved by everyone, that's why I suggested it. […] Done File tests/wraps.c: https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/62319/comment/b58c15bc_ec39dd43 PS5, Line 26: assert_int_equal(flags & io_state->flags, io_state->flags); > flags may be different for each path Done -- To view, visit https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/62319 To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit https://review.coreboot.org/settings Gerrit-Project: flashrom Gerrit-Branch: master Gerrit-Change-Id: If5d24c65f291c53a35509fea5d2f5b3fdb51c306 Gerrit-Change-Number: 62319 Gerrit-PatchSet: 8 Gerrit-Owner: Edward O'Callaghan <quasisec(a)chromium.org> Gerrit-Reviewer: Anastasia Klimchuk <aklm(a)chromium.org> Gerrit-Reviewer: Daniel Campello <campello(a)chromium.org> Gerrit-Reviewer: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply(a)coreboot.org> Gerrit-CC: Paul Menzel <paulepanter(a)mailbox.org> Gerrit-Attention: Edward O'Callaghan <quasisec(a)chromium.org> Gerrit-Attention: Anastasia Klimchuk <aklm(a)chromium.org> Gerrit-Comment-Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2022 04:00:04 +0000 Gerrit-HasComments: Yes Gerrit-Has-Labels: No Comment-In-Reply-To: Edward O'Callaghan <quasisec(a)chromium.org> Comment-In-Reply-To: Daniel Campello <campello(a)chromium.org> Comment-In-Reply-To: Anastasia Klimchuk <aklm(a)chromium.org> Gerrit-MessageType: comment

1 0

Change in flashrom[master]: tests/: wrap flock() and ftruncate()
by Daniel Campello (Code Review) 31 Mar '22

31 Mar '22

Attention is currently required from: Edward O'Callaghan, Anastasia Klimchuk. Daniel Campello has posted comments on this change. ( https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/62312 ) Change subject: tests/: wrap flock() and ftruncate() ...................................................................... Patch Set 9: Code-Review+1 (1 comment) Commit Message: https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/62312/comment/aab1c77b_78e0ebbd PS6, Line 7: wrap flock() and ftruncate() > Let's mention in commit description that the code which uses these mocks is introduced further in th […] To this point I think this should be squashed with CB:62213 -- To view, visit https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/62312 To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit https://review.coreboot.org/settings Gerrit-Project: flashrom Gerrit-Branch: master Gerrit-Change-Id: I57e7843a4d94c0a7200690d4c1d9e4194b9f83c5 Gerrit-Change-Number: 62312 Gerrit-PatchSet: 9 Gerrit-Owner: Edward O'Callaghan <quasisec(a)chromium.org> Gerrit-Reviewer: Anastasia Klimchuk <aklm(a)chromium.org> Gerrit-Reviewer: Daniel Campello <campello(a)chromium.org> Gerrit-Reviewer: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply(a)coreboot.org> Gerrit-CC: Paul Menzel <paulepanter(a)mailbox.org> Gerrit-Attention: Edward O'Callaghan <quasisec(a)chromium.org> Gerrit-Attention: Anastasia Klimchuk <aklm(a)chromium.org> Gerrit-Comment-Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2022 00:50:59 +0000 Gerrit-HasComments: Yes Gerrit-Has-Labels: Yes Comment-In-Reply-To: Anastasia Klimchuk <aklm(a)chromium.org> Gerrit-MessageType: comment

1 0

Change in flashrom[master]: tests: assert pathname and flags when calling open()
by Daniel Campello (Code Review) 31 Mar '22

31 Mar '22

Attention is currently required from: Edward O'Callaghan. Daniel Campello has posted comments on this change. ( https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/63227 ) Change subject: tests: assert pathname and flags when calling open() ...................................................................... Patch Set 5: (1 comment) File tests/tests.c: https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/63227/comment/14a25696_e3c5d78c PS3, Line 85: //assert_non_null(io_state->paths[io_state->noc]); > remove? oversight, removed the comment, kept the assertion -- To view, visit https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/63227 To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit https://review.coreboot.org/settings Gerrit-Project: flashrom Gerrit-Branch: master Gerrit-Change-Id: Ib46ca5b854c8453ec02ae09f3151cd4d25f988eb Gerrit-Change-Number: 63227 Gerrit-PatchSet: 5 Gerrit-Owner: Daniel Campello <campello(a)chromium.org> Gerrit-Reviewer: Edward O'Callaghan <quasisec(a)chromium.org> Gerrit-Reviewer: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply(a)coreboot.org> Gerrit-Attention: Edward O'Callaghan <quasisec(a)chromium.org> Gerrit-Comment-Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2022 00:49:29 +0000 Gerrit-HasComments: Yes Gerrit-Has-Labels: No Comment-In-Reply-To: Edward O'Callaghan <quasisec(a)chromium.org> Gerrit-MessageType: comment

1 0

Change in flashrom[master]: flashrom.c: Implement file-based locking semantics
by Daniel Campello (Code Review) 31 Mar '22

31 Mar '22

Attention is currently required from: Hung-Te Lin, Nico Huber, Subrata Banik, Edward O'Callaghan. Daniel Campello has uploaded a new patch set (#14) to the change originally created by Edward O'Callaghan. ( https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/62213 ) Change subject: flashrom.c: Implement file-based locking semantics ...................................................................... flashrom.c: Implement file-based locking semantics This upstreams the ChromiumOS implementation of file-based locking for multiple instances of flashrom that could be spawned either from libflashrom (perhaps by fwupd for example) and user cli as another example. Since flashrom is programming singleton state of hardware from userspace there is no way to exclusively own the address space and therefore a file-based locking semantic is considered here. BUG=b:217629892,b:215255210 BRANCH=none TEST=nm -gD /build/brya/usr/lib64/libflashrom.so | grep "flock" Test futility update with multiple instances of flashrom running. Change-Id: I19cb4e3bf14caeb67c3e8100a20395b264c5113a Signed-off-by: Edward O'Callaghan <quasisec(a)google.com> --- M Makefile A big_lock.c A big_lock.h A file_lock.c M flashrom.c A ipc_lock.h M meson.build M tests/chip.c M tests/include/test.h M tests/io_mock.h M tests/lifecycle.c 11 files changed, 462 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-) git pull ssh://review.coreboot.org:29418/flashrom refs/changes/13/62213/14 -- To view, visit https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/62213 To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit https://review.coreboot.org/settings Gerrit-Project: flashrom Gerrit-Branch: master Gerrit-Change-Id: I19cb4e3bf14caeb67c3e8100a20395b264c5113a Gerrit-Change-Number: 62213 Gerrit-PatchSet: 14 Gerrit-Owner: Edward O'Callaghan <quasisec(a)chromium.org> Gerrit-Reviewer: Hung-Te Lin <hungte(a)chromium.org> Gerrit-Reviewer: Nico Huber <nico.h(a)gmx.de> Gerrit-Reviewer: Subrata Banik <subratabanik(a)google.com> Gerrit-Reviewer: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply(a)coreboot.org> Gerrit-CC: Anastasia Klimchuk <aklm(a)chromium.org> Gerrit-CC: Paul Menzel <paulepanter(a)mailbox.org> Gerrit-Attention: Hung-Te Lin <hungte(a)chromium.org> Gerrit-Attention: Nico Huber <nico.h(a)gmx.de> Gerrit-Attention: Subrata Banik <subratabanik(a)google.com> Gerrit-Attention: Edward O'Callaghan <quasisec(a)chromium.org> Gerrit-MessageType: newpatchset

1 0

Change in flashrom[master]: tests: assert pathname and flags when calling open()
by Daniel Campello (Code Review) 31 Mar '22

31 Mar '22

Attention is currently required from: Daniel Campello. Hello build bot (Jenkins), Edward O'Callaghan, I'd like you to reexamine a change. Please visit https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/63227 to look at the new patch set (#5). Change subject: tests: assert pathname and flags when calling open() ...................................................................... tests: assert pathname and flags when calling open() With this change the wrappers for mock and friends are able to take an optional io_mock_open_state struct to assert expected pathnames and flags whenever an open operation is called. Based partially on https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/62319/5 BUG=b:227404721,b:217629892,b:215255210 TEST=./test_build.sh; FEATURES=test emerge-amd64-generic flashrom BRANCH=none Signed-off-by: Daniel Campello <campello(a)chromium.org> Co-Author: Edward O'Callaghan <quasisec(a)google.com> Change-Id: Ib46ca5b854c8453ec02ae09f3151cd4d25f988eb --- M tests/io_mock.h M tests/lifecycle.c M tests/tests.c 3 files changed, 37 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-) git pull ssh://review.coreboot.org:29418/flashrom refs/changes/27/63227/5 -- To view, visit https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/63227 To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit https://review.coreboot.org/settings Gerrit-Project: flashrom Gerrit-Branch: master Gerrit-Change-Id: Ib46ca5b854c8453ec02ae09f3151cd4d25f988eb Gerrit-Change-Number: 63227 Gerrit-PatchSet: 5 Gerrit-Owner: Daniel Campello <campello(a)chromium.org> Gerrit-Reviewer: Edward O'Callaghan <quasisec(a)chromium.org> Gerrit-Reviewer: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply(a)coreboot.org> Gerrit-Attention: Daniel Campello <campello(a)chromium.org> Gerrit-MessageType: newpatchset

1 0

Change in flashrom[master]: tests/lifecycle.c: Deduce out io-setup-teardown do-pattern
by Daniel Campello (Code Review) 31 Mar '22

31 Mar '22

Attention is currently required from: Edward O'Callaghan. Daniel Campello has posted comments on this change. ( https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/63231 ) Change subject: tests/lifecycle.c: Deduce out io-setup-teardown do-pattern ...................................................................... Patch Set 1: Code-Review+1 -- To view, visit https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/63231 To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit https://review.coreboot.org/settings Gerrit-Project: flashrom Gerrit-Branch: master Gerrit-Change-Id: Icc00acd980a027337acb079f5afc3cccdfe4c765 Gerrit-Change-Number: 63231 Gerrit-PatchSet: 1 Gerrit-Owner: Edward O'Callaghan <quasisec(a)chromium.org> Gerrit-Reviewer: Daniel Campello <campello(a)chromium.org> Gerrit-Reviewer: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply(a)coreboot.org> Gerrit-CC: Anastasia Klimchuk <aklm(a)chromium.org> Gerrit-Attention: Edward O'Callaghan <quasisec(a)chromium.org> Gerrit-Comment-Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2022 00:37:47 +0000 Gerrit-HasComments: No Gerrit-Has-Labels: Yes Gerrit-MessageType: comment

1 0

Change in flashrom[master]: ichspi: Add Jasper Lake support
by Sam McNally (Code Review) 31 Mar '22

31 Mar '22

Attention is currently required from: Nico Huber, Edward O'Callaghan, Angel Pons. Sam McNally has posted comments on this change. ( https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/62282 ) Change subject: ichspi: Add Jasper Lake support ...................................................................... Patch Set 8: Code-Review+2 -- To view, visit https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/62282 To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit https://review.coreboot.org/settings Gerrit-Project: flashrom Gerrit-Branch: master Gerrit-Change-Id: Ib942d0b8942fe0a991b2af0b187414818485153d Gerrit-Change-Number: 62282 Gerrit-PatchSet: 8 Gerrit-Owner: Edward O'Callaghan <quasisec(a)chromium.org> Gerrit-Reviewer: Angel Pons <th3fanbus(a)gmail.com> Gerrit-Reviewer: Sam McNally <sammc(a)google.com> Gerrit-Reviewer: Subrata Banik <subratabanik(a)google.com> Gerrit-Reviewer: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply(a)coreboot.org> Gerrit-CC: Nico Huber <nico.h(a)gmx.de> Gerrit-CC: Paul Menzel <paulepanter(a)mailbox.org> Gerrit-Attention: Nico Huber <nico.h(a)gmx.de> Gerrit-Attention: Edward O'Callaghan <quasisec(a)chromium.org> Gerrit-Attention: Angel Pons <th3fanbus(a)gmail.com> Gerrit-Comment-Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2022 00:20:18 +0000 Gerrit-HasComments: No Gerrit-Has-Labels: Yes Gerrit-MessageType: comment

1 0

Change in flashrom[master]: tests/lifecycle.c: Deduce out io-setup-teardown do-pattern
by Edward O'Callaghan (Code Review) 30 Mar '22

30 Mar '22

Edward O'Callaghan has uploaded this change for review. ( https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/63231 ) Change subject: tests/lifecycle.c: Deduce out io-setup-teardown do-pattern ...................................................................... tests/lifecycle.c: Deduce out io-setup-teardown do-pattern The following do-block is quite error prone to do manually, ``` io_mock_register(&XXX_io); run_probe_lifecycle(state, &XXX, "", ".."); io_mock_register(NULL); ```. Hence, deduce out the common pattern and fold up into the common worker function to handle state machine setup and teardown in a consistent way. BUG=b:227521116 TEST=`ninja test`. Change-Id: Icc00acd980a027337acb079f5afc3cccdfe4c765 Signed-off-by: Edward O'Callaghan <quasisec(a)google.com> --- M tests/lifecycle.c 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 33 deletions(-) git pull ssh://review.coreboot.org:29418/flashrom refs/changes/31/63231/1 diff --git a/tests/lifecycle.c b/tests/lifecycle.c index 282a6b5..4f7f248 100644 --- a/tests/lifecycle.c +++ b/tests/lifecycle.c @@ -35,7 +35,7 @@ flashrom_flash_release(flashctx); /* cleanup */ } -static void run_lifecycle(void **state, const struct programmer_entry *prog, +static void run_lifecycle(void **state, const struct io_mock *io, const struct programmer_entry *prog, const char *param, const char *const chip_name, void (*action)(const struct programmer_entry *prog, struct flashrom_programmer *flashprog, @@ -43,6 +43,8 @@ { (void) state; /* unused */ + io_mock_register(io); + struct flashrom_programmer *flashprog; char *param_dup = strdup(param); @@ -58,27 +60,30 @@ printf("... flashrom_programmer_shutdown for programmer=%s successful\n", prog->name); free(param_dup); + + io_mock_register(NULL); } -static void run_basic_lifecycle(void **state, const struct programmer_entry *prog, const char *param) +static void run_basic_lifecycle(void **state, const struct io_mock *io, + const struct programmer_entry *prog, const char *param) { /* Basic lifecycle only does init and shutdown, * so neither chip name nor action is needed. */ - run_lifecycle(state, prog, param, NULL /* chip_name */, NULL /* action */); + run_lifecycle(state, io, prog, param, NULL /* chip_name */, NULL /* action */); } -static void run_probe_lifecycle(void **state, const struct programmer_entry *prog, - const char *param, const char *const chip_name) +static void run_probe_lifecycle(void **state, const struct io_mock *io, + const struct programmer_entry *prog, const char *param, const char *const chip_name) { /* Each probe lifecycle should run independently, without cache. */ clear_spi_id_cache(); - run_lifecycle(state, prog, param, chip_name, &probe_chip); + run_lifecycle(state, io, prog, param, chip_name, &probe_chip); } void dummy_basic_lifecycle_test_success(void **state) { #if CONFIG_DUMMY == 1 - run_basic_lifecycle(state, &programmer_dummy, "bus=parallel+lpc+fwh+spi"); + run_basic_lifecycle(state, NULL, &programmer_dummy, "bus=parallel+lpc+fwh+spi"); #else skip(); #endif @@ -87,7 +92,7 @@ void dummy_probe_lifecycle_test_success(void **state) { #if CONFIG_DUMMY == 1 - run_probe_lifecycle(state, &programmer_dummy, "bus=spi,emulate=W25Q128FV", "W25Q128.V"); + run_probe_lifecycle(state, NULL, &programmer_dummy, "bus=spi,emulate=W25Q128FV", "W25Q128.V"); #else skip(); #endif @@ -96,7 +101,7 @@ void nicrealtek_basic_lifecycle_test_success(void **state) { #if CONFIG_NICREALTEK == 1 - run_basic_lifecycle(state, &programmer_nicrealtek, ""); + run_basic_lifecycle(state, NULL, &programmer_nicrealtek, ""); #else skip(); #endif @@ -188,11 +193,7 @@ char raiden_debug_param[12]; snprintf(raiden_debug_param, 12, "address=%d", USB_DEVICE_ADDRESS); - io_mock_register(&raiden_debug_io); - - run_basic_lifecycle(state, &programmer_raiden_debug_spi, raiden_debug_param); - - io_mock_register(NULL); + run_basic_lifecycle(state, &raiden_debug_io, &programmer_raiden_debug_spi, raiden_debug_param); #else skip(); #endif @@ -229,11 +230,7 @@ .libusb_control_transfer = dediprog_libusb_control_transfer, }; - io_mock_register(&dediprog_io); - - run_basic_lifecycle(state, &programmer_dediprog, "voltage=3.5V"); - - io_mock_register(NULL); + run_basic_lifecycle(state, &dediprog_io, &programmer_dediprog, "voltage=3.5V"); #else skip(); #endif @@ -306,11 +303,7 @@ .fclose = linux_mtd_fclose, }; - io_mock_register(&linux_mtd_io); - - run_probe_lifecycle(state, &programmer_linux_mtd, "", "Opaque flash chip"); - - io_mock_register(NULL); + run_probe_lifecycle(state, &linux_mtd_io, &programmer_linux_mtd, "", "Opaque flash chip"); #else skip(); #endif @@ -360,11 +353,7 @@ .ioctl = linux_spi_ioctl, }; - io_mock_register(&linux_spi_io); - - run_probe_lifecycle(state, &programmer_linux_spi, "dev=/dev/null", "W25Q128.V"); - - io_mock_register(NULL); + run_probe_lifecycle(state, &linux_spi_io, &programmer_linux_spi, "dev=/dev/null", "W25Q128.V"); #else skip(); #endif @@ -414,11 +403,8 @@ .read = realtek_mst_read, .write = realtek_mst_write, }; - io_mock_register(&realtek_mst_io); - run_basic_lifecycle(state, &programmer_realtek_mst_i2c_spi, "bus=254,enter-isp=0"); - - io_mock_register(NULL); + run_basic_lifecycle(state, &realtek_mst_io, &programmer_realtek_mst_i2c_spi, "bus=254,enter-isp=0"); #else skip(); #endif /* CONFIG_REALTEK_I2C_SPI */ -- To view, visit https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/63231 To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit https://review.coreboot.org/settings Gerrit-Project: flashrom Gerrit-Branch: master Gerrit-Change-Id: Icc00acd980a027337acb079f5afc3cccdfe4c765 Gerrit-Change-Number: 63231 Gerrit-PatchSet: 1 Gerrit-Owner: Edward O'Callaghan <quasisec(a)chromium.org> Gerrit-MessageType: newchange

1 0

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

flashrom-gerrit March 2022