January 2022 - flashrom-gerrit

Change in flashrom[master]: hwaccess: fix build on non-x86 targets
by Peter Marheine (Code Review) 19 Jan '22

19 Jan '22

Peter Marheine has uploaded this change for review. ( https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/61194 ) Change subject: hwaccess: fix build on non-x86 targets ...................................................................... hwaccess: fix build on non-x86 targets The changes to hwaccess in https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/60110 cause build failure on non-x86 systems because: * a new include file pulls in <sys/io.h> which only exists on x86 but the header may be used on other platforms * the new rget_io_perms function only works on x86 This change makes sys/io.h and rget_io_perms implementation only be included when building for x86 targets, which fixes the build on ARM. BUG=None TEST=meson build succeeds for both x86 and ARM targets Change-Id: I20f122679c30340b2c73afd7419e79644ddc3c4e --- M hwaccess_x86_io.c M hwaccess_x86_io.h 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) git pull ssh://review.coreboot.org:29418/flashrom refs/changes/94/61194/1 diff --git a/hwaccess_x86_io.c b/hwaccess_x86_io.c index 3152bfe..7eee02a 100644 --- a/hwaccess_x86_io.c +++ b/hwaccess_x86_io.c @@ -33,7 +33,7 @@ int io_fd; #endif -#if !(defined(__DJGPP__) || defined(__LIBPAYLOAD__)) +#if defined(__i386__) || defined(__x86_64__) && !(defined(__DJGPP__) || defined(__LIBPAYLOAD__)) static int release_io_perms(void *p) { #if defined (__sun) @@ -79,7 +79,7 @@ #else /* DJGPP and libpayload environments have full PCI port I/O permissions by default. */ -/* PCI port I/O support is unimplemented on PPC/MIPS and unavailable on ARM. */ +/* PCI port I/O support is unimplemented on non-x86 platforms. */ int rget_io_perms(void) { return 0; diff --git a/hwaccess_x86_io.h b/hwaccess_x86_io.h index 0d16fdd..5cf151d 100644 --- a/hwaccess_x86_io.h +++ b/hwaccess_x86_io.h @@ -25,7 +25,7 @@ * that a Linux system's libc has a suitable sys/io.h or (on non-Linux) we depend on glibc to offer it. */ #if defined(__ANDROID__) #include <sys/glibc-syscalls.h> -#elif defined(__linux__) || defined(__GLIBC__) +#elif (defined(__i386__) || defined(__x86_64__)) && (defined(__linux__) || defined(__GLIBC__)) #include <sys/io.h> #endif -- To view, visit https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/61194 To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit https://review.coreboot.org/settings Gerrit-Project: flashrom Gerrit-Branch: master Gerrit-Change-Id: I20f122679c30340b2c73afd7419e79644ddc3c4e Gerrit-Change-Number: 61194 Gerrit-PatchSet: 1 Gerrit-Owner: Peter Marheine <pmarheine(a)chromium.org> Gerrit-MessageType: newchange

1 0

Change in flashrom[master]: tests: Upgrade linux_spi test to run probe lifecycle
by Anastasia Klimchuk (Code Review) 19 Jan '22

19 Jan '22

Attention is currently required from: Nico Huber, Edward O'Callaghan, Angel Pons. Anastasia Klimchuk has posted comments on this change. ( https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/59742 ) Change subject: tests: Upgrade linux_spi test to run probe lifecycle ...................................................................... Patch Set 4: (2 comments) This change is ready for review. File tests/lifecycle.c: https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/59742/comment/9ec1c5db_a45d242e PS2, Line 336: W25Q128.V > Thank you so much for finding the problem! I missed the elephant in the room, forgot about caching I […] I fixed my epic fail :) I only have a question about spidev include (I added another comment). File tests/lifecycle.c: https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/59742/comment/d61d5041_72f0f817 PS4, Line 18: #include <linux/spi/spidev.h> This include seems inevitable... is it ok? Do I need to guard it with anything? (like CONFIG_LINUX_SPI for example) -- To view, visit https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/59742 To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit https://review.coreboot.org/settings Gerrit-Project: flashrom Gerrit-Branch: master Gerrit-Change-Id: I32d8e972d99b52c2b18f688aa6aeae75dd170f72 Gerrit-Change-Number: 59742 Gerrit-PatchSet: 4 Gerrit-Owner: Anastasia Klimchuk <aklm(a)chromium.org> Gerrit-Reviewer: Anastasia Klimchuk <aklm(a)chromium.org> Gerrit-Reviewer: Angel Pons <th3fanbus(a)gmail.com> Gerrit-Reviewer: Edward O'Callaghan <quasisec(a)chromium.org> Gerrit-Reviewer: Nico Huber <nico.h(a)gmx.de> Gerrit-Reviewer: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply(a)coreboot.org> Gerrit-CC: Paul Menzel <paulepanter(a)mailbox.org> Gerrit-Attention: Nico Huber <nico.h(a)gmx.de> Gerrit-Attention: Edward O'Callaghan <quasisec(a)chromium.org> Gerrit-Attention: Angel Pons <th3fanbus(a)gmail.com> Gerrit-Comment-Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2022 03:23:00 +0000 Gerrit-HasComments: Yes Gerrit-Has-Labels: No Comment-In-Reply-To: Nico Huber <nico.h(a)gmx.de> Comment-In-Reply-To: Anastasia Klimchuk <aklm(a)chromium.org> Gerrit-MessageType: comment

1 0

Change in flashrom[master]: tests: test write protection
by Anastasia Klimchuk (Code Review) 19 Jan '22

19 Jan '22

Attention is currently required from: Nico Huber, Nikolai Artemiev, Sergii Dmytruk. Anastasia Klimchuk has posted comments on this change. ( https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/59075 ) Change subject: tests: test write protection ...................................................................... Patch Set 26: (1 comment) Patchset: PS26: Sergii, there is a change happening at the moment: converting everything to call libflashrom API, and everything includes tests. Your tests are calling do_erase, so you need to update them as well. Good news: it will be really easy, and here is an example CB:61137 No rush, you can do at convenient time. Your chain will go chronologically after write-protect chain anyway. Thank you! -- To view, visit https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/59075 To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit https://review.coreboot.org/settings Gerrit-Project: flashrom Gerrit-Branch: master Gerrit-Change-Id: I49af7f6d173eb4c56c22d80b01a473b8c499c0f8 Gerrit-Change-Number: 59075 Gerrit-PatchSet: 26 Gerrit-Owner: Sergii Dmytruk <sergii.dmytruk(a)3mdeb.com> Gerrit-Reviewer: Anastasia Klimchuk <aklm(a)chromium.org> Gerrit-Reviewer: Angel Pons <th3fanbus(a)gmail.com> Gerrit-Reviewer: Nico Huber <nico.h(a)gmx.de> Gerrit-Reviewer: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply(a)coreboot.org> Gerrit-CC: Maciej Pijanowski <maciej.pijanowski(a)3mdeb.com> Gerrit-CC: Nikolai Artemiev <nartemiev(a)google.com> Gerrit-CC: Paul Menzel <paulepanter(a)mailbox.org> Gerrit-Attention: Nico Huber <nico.h(a)gmx.de> Gerrit-Attention: Nikolai Artemiev <nartemiev(a)google.com> Gerrit-Attention: Sergii Dmytruk <sergii.dmytruk(a)3mdeb.com> Gerrit-Comment-Date: Tue, 18 Jan 2022 23:08:34 +0000 Gerrit-HasComments: Yes Gerrit-Has-Labels: No Gerrit-MessageType: comment

1 0

Change in flashrom[master]: [RFC][OTP] spi25_statusreg: support reading/writing security register
by Sergii Dmytruk (Code Review) 18 Jan '22

18 Jan '22

Attention is currently required from: Nico Huber, Angel Pons, Sergii Dmytruk. Hello build bot (Jenkins), Nico Huber, Angel Pons, I'd like you to reexamine a change. Please visit https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/59709 to look at the new patch set (#18). Change subject: [RFC][OTP] spi25_statusreg: support reading/writing security register ...................................................................... [RFC][OTP] spi25_statusreg: support reading/writing security register Not to be confused with "secure registers" of OTP. Security register is a dedicated status register for security-related bits. You don't write its value directly, issuing corresponding write command with no data just sets OTP bit to 1 automatically. No WREN is necessary, but at least some datasheets indicate BUSY state after write command. Unlike cases where OTP bit is part of SR and can only be written while in OTP mode, security register can only be written outside of the mode. Change-Id: Iae1753ca4cb051127a5bcbeba7f064053adb8dae Signed-off-by: Sergii Dmytruk <sergii.dmytruk(a)3mdeb.com> --- M flash.h M spi.h M spi25_statusreg.c 3 files changed, 74 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-) git pull ssh://review.coreboot.org:29418/flashrom refs/changes/09/59709/18 -- To view, visit https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/59709 To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit https://review.coreboot.org/settings Gerrit-Project: flashrom Gerrit-Branch: master Gerrit-Change-Id: Iae1753ca4cb051127a5bcbeba7f064053adb8dae Gerrit-Change-Number: 59709 Gerrit-PatchSet: 18 Gerrit-Owner: Sergii Dmytruk <sergii.dmytruk(a)3mdeb.com> Gerrit-Reviewer: Angel Pons <th3fanbus(a)gmail.com> Gerrit-Reviewer: Nico Huber <nico.h(a)gmx.de> Gerrit-Reviewer: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply(a)coreboot.org> Gerrit-CC: Paul Menzel <paulepanter(a)mailbox.org> Gerrit-Attention: Nico Huber <nico.h(a)gmx.de> Gerrit-Attention: Angel Pons <th3fanbus(a)gmail.com> Gerrit-Attention: Sergii Dmytruk <sergii.dmytruk(a)3mdeb.com> Gerrit-MessageType: newpatchset

1 0

Change in flashrom[master]: [RFC][OTP] tests: add tests for OTP regions
by Sergii Dmytruk (Code Review) 18 Jan '22

18 Jan '22

Attention is currently required from: Nico Huber, Angel Pons, Sergii Dmytruk. Hello build bot (Jenkins), Nico Huber, Angel Pons, I'd like you to reexamine a change. Please visit https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/59406 to look at the new patch set (#22). Change subject: [RFC][OTP] tests: add tests for OTP regions ...................................................................... [RFC][OTP] tests: add tests for OTP regions There are two sets of tests targeting two new dummyflasher chips that provide two kinds of OTP. Change-Id: I4ff584395367dfd52db89332d8e45d7e865276e1 Signed-off-by: Hatim Kanchwala <hatim at hatimak.me> Signed-off-by: Sergii Dmytruk <sergii.dmytruk(a)3mdeb.com> --- A tests/chip_otp.c M tests/meson.build M tests/tests.c M tests/tests.h 4 files changed, 402 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) git pull ssh://review.coreboot.org:29418/flashrom refs/changes/06/59406/22 -- To view, visit https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/59406 To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit https://review.coreboot.org/settings Gerrit-Project: flashrom Gerrit-Branch: master Gerrit-Change-Id: I4ff584395367dfd52db89332d8e45d7e865276e1 Gerrit-Change-Number: 59406 Gerrit-PatchSet: 22 Gerrit-Owner: Sergii Dmytruk <sergii.dmytruk(a)3mdeb.com> Gerrit-Reviewer: Angel Pons <th3fanbus(a)gmail.com> Gerrit-Reviewer: Nico Huber <nico.h(a)gmx.de> Gerrit-Reviewer: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply(a)coreboot.org> Gerrit-CC: Paul Menzel <paulepanter(a)mailbox.org> Gerrit-Attention: Nico Huber <nico.h(a)gmx.de> Gerrit-Attention: Angel Pons <th3fanbus(a)gmail.com> Gerrit-Attention: Sergii Dmytruk <sergii.dmytruk(a)3mdeb.com> Gerrit-MessageType: newpatchset

1 0

Change in flashrom[master]: [RFC][OTP] flashchips: add support for OTP to several chip models
by Sergii Dmytruk (Code Review) 18 Jan '22

18 Jan '22

Attention is currently required from: Nico Huber, Angel Pons, Sergii Dmytruk. Hello build bot (Jenkins), Nico Huber, Angel Pons, I'd like you to reexamine a change. Please visit https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/59405 to look at the new patch set (#22). Change subject: [RFC][OTP] flashchips: add support for OTP to several chip models ...................................................................... [RFC][OTP] flashchips: add support for OTP to several chip models List of the chips: * Eon EN25Q16 * Eon EN25Q32(A/B) * Eon EN25Q40 * Eon EN25Q64 * Eon EN25Q80(A) * Eon EN25QH128 * Eon EN25QH16 * Eon EN25QH32 * Eon EN25QH64 * GigaDevice GD25Q127C/GD25Q128C * GigaDevice GD25VQ21B * GigaDevice GD25VQ41B * Winbond W25Q40.V * Winbond W25Q128.V Change-Id: I98491ed00d1e5fa6682bcdc4d5e132ec76447f21 Signed-off-by: Hatim Kanchwala <hatim at hatimak.me> Signed-off-by: Sergii Dmytruk <sergii.dmytruk(a)3mdeb.com> --- M Makefile M flashchips.c M meson.build M otp.h A otp_layouts.c 5 files changed, 233 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-) git pull ssh://review.coreboot.org:29418/flashrom refs/changes/05/59405/22 -- To view, visit https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/59405 To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit https://review.coreboot.org/settings Gerrit-Project: flashrom Gerrit-Branch: master Gerrit-Change-Id: I98491ed00d1e5fa6682bcdc4d5e132ec76447f21 Gerrit-Change-Number: 59405 Gerrit-PatchSet: 22 Gerrit-Owner: Sergii Dmytruk <sergii.dmytruk(a)3mdeb.com> Gerrit-Reviewer: Angel Pons <th3fanbus(a)gmail.com> Gerrit-Reviewer: Nico Huber <nico.h(a)gmx.de> Gerrit-Reviewer: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply(a)coreboot.org> Gerrit-CC: Paul Menzel <paulepanter(a)mailbox.org> Gerrit-Attention: Nico Huber <nico.h(a)gmx.de> Gerrit-Attention: Angel Pons <th3fanbus(a)gmail.com> Gerrit-Attention: Sergii Dmytruk <sergii.dmytruk(a)3mdeb.com> Gerrit-MessageType: newpatchset

1 0

Change in flashrom[master]: tests: test write protection
by Sergii Dmytruk (Code Review) 18 Jan '22

18 Jan '22

Attention is currently required from: Nico Huber, Nikolai Artemiev, Sergii Dmytruk. Hello build bot (Jenkins), Nico Huber, Angel Pons, Anastasia Klimchuk, I'd like you to reexamine a change. Please visit https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/59075 to look at the new patch set (#26). Change subject: tests: test write protection ...................................................................... tests: test write protection Tests both WP implementation and its emulation in dummy programmer. Change-Id: I49af7f6d173eb4c56c22d80b01a473b8c499c0f8 Signed-off-by: Sergii Dmytruk <sergii.dmytruk(a)3mdeb.com> --- A tests/chip_wp.c M tests/meson.build M tests/tests.c M tests/tests.h 4 files changed, 317 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) git pull ssh://review.coreboot.org:29418/flashrom refs/changes/75/59075/26 -- To view, visit https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/59075 To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit https://review.coreboot.org/settings Gerrit-Project: flashrom Gerrit-Branch: master Gerrit-Change-Id: I49af7f6d173eb4c56c22d80b01a473b8c499c0f8 Gerrit-Change-Number: 59075 Gerrit-PatchSet: 26 Gerrit-Owner: Sergii Dmytruk <sergii.dmytruk(a)3mdeb.com> Gerrit-Reviewer: Anastasia Klimchuk <aklm(a)chromium.org> Gerrit-Reviewer: Angel Pons <th3fanbus(a)gmail.com> Gerrit-Reviewer: Nico Huber <nico.h(a)gmx.de> Gerrit-Reviewer: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply(a)coreboot.org> Gerrit-CC: Maciej Pijanowski <maciej.pijanowski(a)3mdeb.com> Gerrit-CC: Nikolai Artemiev <nartemiev(a)google.com> Gerrit-CC: Paul Menzel <paulepanter(a)mailbox.org> Gerrit-Attention: Nico Huber <nico.h(a)gmx.de> Gerrit-Attention: Nikolai Artemiev <nartemiev(a)google.com> Gerrit-Attention: Sergii Dmytruk <sergii.dmytruk(a)3mdeb.com> Gerrit-MessageType: newpatchset

1 0

Change in flashrom[master]: flashchips: enable write-protection for W25Q{64,128}.V
by Sergii Dmytruk (Code Review) 18 Jan '22

18 Jan '22

Attention is currently required from: Nico Huber, Angel Pons, Anastasia Klimchuk. Hello build bot (Jenkins), Nico Huber, Angel Pons, Nikolai Artemiev, Anastasia Klimchuk, I'd like you to reexamine a change. Please visit https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/59071 to look at the new patch set (#21). Change subject: flashchips: enable write-protection for W25Q{64,128}.V ...................................................................... flashchips: enable write-protection for W25Q{64,128}.V Configuration for W25Q64 was tested on hardware (W25Q64FV). Emulation of W25Q128 in dummyflasher will be extended to support WP. Haven't tested this one on hardware, but it's the same configuration as for W25Q64 except that it has WPS. W25Q64.V chip was split into W25Q64BV/W25Q64CV/W25Q64FV (no SR3 and WPS) and W25Q64JV (SR3 and WPS). Change-Id: Iccb69a8d3a0dd2192e2c938caddaf07b1889ed35 Signed-off-by: Sergii Dmytruk <sergii.dmytruk(a)3mdeb.com> --- M flashchips.c 1 file changed, 72 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) git pull ssh://review.coreboot.org:29418/flashrom refs/changes/71/59071/21 -- To view, visit https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/59071 To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit https://review.coreboot.org/settings Gerrit-Project: flashrom Gerrit-Branch: master Gerrit-Change-Id: Iccb69a8d3a0dd2192e2c938caddaf07b1889ed35 Gerrit-Change-Number: 59071 Gerrit-PatchSet: 21 Gerrit-Owner: Sergii Dmytruk <sergii.dmytruk(a)3mdeb.com> Gerrit-Reviewer: Anastasia Klimchuk <aklm(a)chromium.org> Gerrit-Reviewer: Angel Pons <th3fanbus(a)gmail.com> Gerrit-Reviewer: Nico Huber <nico.h(a)gmx.de> Gerrit-Reviewer: Nikolai Artemiev <nartemiev(a)google.com> Gerrit-Reviewer: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply(a)coreboot.org> Gerrit-CC: Maciej Pijanowski <maciej.pijanowski(a)3mdeb.com> Gerrit-CC: Paul Menzel <paulepanter(a)mailbox.org> Gerrit-Attention: Nico Huber <nico.h(a)gmx.de> Gerrit-Attention: Angel Pons <th3fanbus(a)gmail.com> Gerrit-Attention: Anastasia Klimchuk <aklm(a)chromium.org> Gerrit-MessageType: newpatchset

1 0

Change in flashrom[master]: spi25_statusreg.c: add SR3 read/write support
by Sergii Dmytruk (Code Review) 18 Jan '22

18 Jan '22

Attention is currently required from: Nico Huber, Anastasia Klimchuk, Nikolai Artemiev. Hello build bot (Jenkins), Nico Huber, Nikolai Artemiev, Anastasia Klimchuk, I'd like you to reexamine a change. Please visit https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/60230 to look at the new patch set (#5). Change subject: spi25_statusreg.c: add SR3 read/write support ...................................................................... spi25_statusreg.c: add SR3 read/write support Adds support for reading and writing the third status register, which needs to be enabled per chip. Extended WRSR doesn't cover SR3, so only one feature flag is added. Change-Id: Id987c544c02da2b956e6ad2c525265cac8f15be1 Signed-off-by: Sergii Dmytruk <sergii.dmytruk(a)3mdeb.com> --- M flash.h M spi.h M spi25_statusreg.c 3 files changed, 30 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) git pull ssh://review.coreboot.org:29418/flashrom refs/changes/30/60230/5 -- To view, visit https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/60230 To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit https://review.coreboot.org/settings Gerrit-Project: flashrom Gerrit-Branch: master Gerrit-Change-Id: Id987c544c02da2b956e6ad2c525265cac8f15be1 Gerrit-Change-Number: 60230 Gerrit-PatchSet: 5 Gerrit-Owner: Sergii Dmytruk <sergii.dmytruk(a)3mdeb.com> Gerrit-Reviewer: Anastasia Klimchuk <aklm(a)chromium.org> Gerrit-Reviewer: Nico Huber <nico.h(a)gmx.de> Gerrit-Reviewer: Nikolai Artemiev <nartemiev(a)google.com> Gerrit-Reviewer: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply(a)coreboot.org> Gerrit-CC: Maciej Pijanowski <maciej.pijanowski(a)3mdeb.com> Gerrit-CC: Paul Menzel <paulepanter(a)mailbox.org> Gerrit-Attention: Nico Huber <nico.h(a)gmx.de> Gerrit-Attention: Anastasia Klimchuk <aklm(a)chromium.org> Gerrit-Attention: Nikolai Artemiev <nartemiev(a)google.com> Gerrit-MessageType: newpatchset

1 0

Change in flashrom[master]: tests: Add run_probe_lifecycle and add dummyflasher probe test
by Anastasia Klimchuk (Code Review) 18 Jan '22

18 Jan '22

Attention is currently required from: Nico Huber, Angel Pons. Anastasia Klimchuk has posted comments on this change. ( https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/59741 ) Change subject: tests: Add run_probe_lifecycle and add dummyflasher probe test ...................................................................... Patch Set 3: (1 comment) File tests/lifecycle.c: https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/59741/comment/427f4eba_8b10511f PS3, Line 72: /* Each probe lifecycle should run independently, without cache. */ : clear_spi_id_cache(); Fix for the situation when subsequent tests were using cache and skipping the actual send command. -- To view, visit https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/59741 To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit https://review.coreboot.org/settings Gerrit-Project: flashrom Gerrit-Branch: master Gerrit-Change-Id: I9eb7fe3a436fbba5e70db957139fd26e00efec36 Gerrit-Change-Number: 59741 Gerrit-PatchSet: 3 Gerrit-Owner: Anastasia Klimchuk <aklm(a)chromium.org> Gerrit-Reviewer: Angel Pons <th3fanbus(a)gmail.com> Gerrit-Reviewer: Edward O'Callaghan <quasisec(a)chromium.org> Gerrit-Reviewer: Nico Huber <nico.h(a)gmx.de> Gerrit-Reviewer: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply(a)coreboot.org> Gerrit-CC: Paul Menzel <paulepanter(a)mailbox.org> Gerrit-Attention: Nico Huber <nico.h(a)gmx.de> Gerrit-Attention: Angel Pons <th3fanbus(a)gmail.com> Gerrit-Comment-Date: Tue, 18 Jan 2022 06:03:02 +0000 Gerrit-HasComments: Yes Gerrit-Has-Labels: No Gerrit-MessageType: comment

1 0

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

flashrom-gerrit January 2022