flashrom

flashrom@flashrom.org

6 participants
9186 discussions

[PATCH] CID1130010: Resource leak
by Stefan Reinauer 27 May '14

27 May '14

CID1130010: Resource leak The system resource will not be reclaimed and reused, reducing the future availability of the resource. In verify_range: Leak of memory or pointers to system resources Signed-off-by: Stefan Reinauer <stefan.reinauer(a)coreboot.org> Index: flashrom.c =================================================================== --- flashrom.c (revision 1763) +++ flashrom.c (working copy) @@ -676,7 +676,8 @@ if (!flash->chip->read) { msg_cerr("ERROR: flashrom has no read function for this flash chip.\n"); - return 1; + ret = -1; + goto out_free; } if (!readbuf) { msg_gerr("Could not allocate memory!\n");

2 2

[commit] r1799 - trunk
by repository service 27 May '14

27 May '14

Author: stefanct Date: Tue May 27 00:05:31 2014 New Revision: 1799 URL: http://flashrom.org/trac/flashrom/changeset/1799 Log: Fix selfcheck of various arrays. Stefan Reinauer has reported ridiculous NULL checks for arrays in our self_check function found by Coverity (CID1130005). This patch removes the useless checks but keeps and fixes the one responsible for the flashchips array by exporting the array size in a new constant. Signed-off-by: Stefan Tauner <stefan.tauner(a)alumni.tuwien.ac.at> Acked-by: Carl-Daniel Hailfinger <c-d.hailfinger.devel.2006(a)gmx.net> Modified: trunk/flash.h trunk/flashchips.c trunk/flashrom.c Modified: trunk/flash.h ============================================================================== --- trunk/flash.h Mon May 26 02:36:24 2014 (r1798) +++ trunk/flash.h Tue May 27 00:05:31 2014 (r1799) @@ -225,6 +225,7 @@ #define TIMING_ZERO -2 extern const struct flashchip flashchips[]; +extern const unsigned int flashchips_size; void chip_writeb(const struct flashctx *flash, uint8_t val, chipaddr addr); void chip_writew(const struct flashctx *flash, uint16_t val, chipaddr addr); Modified: trunk/flashchips.c ============================================================================== --- trunk/flashchips.c Mon May 26 02:36:24 2014 (r1798) +++ trunk/flashchips.c Tue May 27 00:05:31 2014 (r1799) @@ -13424,5 +13424,7 @@ .write = NULL, }, - { NULL } + {0} }; + +const unsigned int flashchips_size = ARRAY_SIZE(flashchips); Modified: trunk/flashrom.c ============================================================================== --- trunk/flashrom.c Mon May 26 02:36:24 2014 (r1798) +++ trunk/flashrom.c Tue May 27 00:05:31 2014 (r1799) @@ -1269,10 +1269,7 @@ return ret; } -/* This function shares a lot of its structure with erase_and_write_flash() and - * walk_eraseregions(). - * Even if an error is found, the function will keep going and check the rest. - */ +/* Even if an error is found, the function will keep going and check the rest. */ static int selfcheck_eraseblocks(const struct flashchip *chip) { int i, j, k; @@ -1694,8 +1691,7 @@ int selfcheck(void) { - const struct flashchip *chip; - int i; + unsigned int i; int ret = 0; /* Safety check. Instead of aborting after the first error, check @@ -1748,37 +1744,32 @@ ret = 1; } } - /* It would be favorable if we could also check for correct termination - * of the following arrays, but we don't know their sizes in here... - * For 'flashchips' we check the first element to be non-null. In the - * other cases there exist use cases where the first element can be - * null. */ - if (flashchips == NULL || flashchips[0].vendor == NULL) { + + /* It would be favorable if we could check for the correct layout (especially termination) of various + * constant arrays: flashchips, chipset_enables, board_matches, boards_known, laptops_known. + * They are all defined as externs in this compilation unit so we don't know their sizes which vary + * depending on compiler flags, e.g. the target architecture, and can sometimes be 0. + * For 'flashchips' we export the size explicitly to work around this and to be able to implement the + * checks below. */ + if (flashchips_size <= 1 || flashchips[flashchips_size-1].name != NULL) { msg_gerr("Flashchips table miscompilation!\n"); ret = 1; + } else { + for (i = 0; i < flashchips_size - 1; i++) { + const struct flashchip *chip = &flashchips[i]; + if (chip->vendor == NULL || chip->name == NULL || chip->bustype == BUS_NONE) { + ret = 1; + msg_gerr("ERROR: Some field of flash chip #%d (%s) is misconfigured.\n" + "Please report a bug at flashrom(a)flashrom.org\n", i, + chip->name == NULL ? "unnamed" : chip->name); + } + if (selfcheck_eraseblocks(chip)) { + ret = 1; + } + } } - for (chip = flashchips; chip && chip->name; chip++) - if (selfcheck_eraseblocks(chip)) - ret = 1; -#if CONFIG_INTERNAL == 1 - if (chipset_enables == NULL) { - msg_gerr("Chipset enables table does not exist!\n"); - ret = 1; - } - if (board_matches == NULL) { - msg_gerr("Board enables table does not exist!\n"); - ret = 1; - } - if (boards_known == NULL) { - msg_gerr("Known boards table does not exist!\n"); - ret = 1; - } - if (laptops_known == NULL) { - msg_gerr("Known laptops table does not exist!\n"); - ret = 1; - } -#endif + /* TODO: implement similar sanity checks for other arrays where deemed necessary. */ return ret; }

1 0

[commit] r1798 - trunk
by repository service 26 May '14

26 May '14

Author: stefanct Date: Mon May 26 02:36:24 2014 New Revision: 1798 URL: http://flashrom.org/trac/flashrom/changeset/1798 Log: Add two new states to enum test_state and use it for flashchips. The new enum test_state looks like this: enum test_state { OK = 0, NT = 1, /* Not tested */ BAD, /* Known to not work */ DEP, /* Support depends on configuration (e.g. Intel flash descriptor) */ NA, /* Not applicable (e.g. write support on ROM chips) */ }; The second new state 'NA' is introduced, among other things, to indicate the erase and write states of real ROMs correctly. This is also implemented by this patch and required to exchange the previous bit mask in struct flashchip with a new struct containing an enum test_state for each operation. The -L output is changed accordingly to print '-' in the case of an N/A state and the wiki output uses a new template producing a greyed out cell. Previous users of enum test_state are not affected by this change (yet). Signed-off-by: Stefan Tauner <stefan.tauner(a)alumni.tuwien.ac.at> Acked-by: Carl-Daniel Hailfinger <c-d.hailfinger.devel.2006(a)gmx.net> Modified: trunk/flash.h trunk/flashchips.c trunk/flashrom.c trunk/print.c trunk/print_wiki.c Modified: trunk/flash.h ============================================================================== --- trunk/flash.h Sun May 25 09:47:47 2014 (r1797) +++ trunk/flash.h Mon May 26 02:36:24 2014 (r1798) @@ -120,6 +120,26 @@ #define FEATURE_OTP (1 << 8) #define FEATURE_QPI (1 << 9) +enum test_state { + OK = 0, + NT = 1, /* Not tested */ + BAD, /* Known to not work */ + DEP, /* Support depends on configuration (e.g. Intel flash descriptor) */ + NA, /* Not applicable (e.g. write support on ROM chips) */ +}; + +#define TEST_UNTESTED (struct tested){ .probe = NT, .read = NT, .erase = NT, .write = NT } + +#define TEST_OK_PROBE (struct tested){ .probe = OK, .read = NT, .erase = NT, .write = NT } +#define TEST_OK_PR (struct tested){ .probe = OK, .read = OK, .erase = NT, .write = NT } +#define TEST_OK_PRE (struct tested){ .probe = OK, .read = OK, .erase = OK, .write = NT } +#define TEST_OK_PREW (struct tested){ .probe = OK, .read = OK, .erase = OK, .write = OK } + +#define TEST_BAD_PROBE (struct tested){ .probe = BAD, .read = NT, .erase = NT, .write = NT } +#define TEST_BAD_PR (struct tested){ .probe = BAD, .read = BAD, .erase = NT, .write = NT } +#define TEST_BAD_PRE (struct tested){ .probe = BAD, .read = BAD, .erase = BAD, .write = NT } +#define TEST_BAD_PREW (struct tested){ .probe = BAD, .read = BAD, .erase = BAD, .write = BAD } + struct flashctx; typedef int (erasefunc_t)(struct flashctx *flash, unsigned int addr, unsigned int blocklen); @@ -143,11 +163,13 @@ unsigned int page_size; int feature_bits; - /* - * Indicate if flashrom has been tested with this flash chip and if - * everything worked correctly. - */ - uint32_t tested; + /* Indicate how well flashrom supports different operations of this flash chip. */ + struct tested { + enum test_state probe; + enum test_state read; + enum test_state erase; + enum test_state write; + } tested; int (*probe) (struct flashctx *flash); @@ -192,27 +214,6 @@ struct registered_programmer *pgm; }; -#define TEST_UNTESTED 0 - -#define TEST_OK_PROBE (1 << 0) -#define TEST_OK_READ (1 << 1) -#define TEST_OK_ERASE (1 << 2) -#define TEST_OK_WRITE (1 << 3) -#define TEST_OK_PR (TEST_OK_PROBE | TEST_OK_READ) -#define TEST_OK_PRE (TEST_OK_PROBE | TEST_OK_READ | TEST_OK_ERASE) -#define TEST_OK_PRW (TEST_OK_PROBE | TEST_OK_READ | TEST_OK_WRITE) -#define TEST_OK_PREW (TEST_OK_PROBE | TEST_OK_READ | TEST_OK_ERASE | TEST_OK_WRITE) -#define TEST_OK_MASK 0x0f - -#define TEST_BAD_PROBE (1 << 4) -#define TEST_BAD_READ (1 << 5) -#define TEST_BAD_ERASE (1 << 6) -#define TEST_BAD_WRITE (1 << 7) -#define TEST_BAD_EW (TEST_BAD_ERASE | TEST_BAD_WRITE) -#define TEST_BAD_REW (TEST_BAD_READ | TEST_BAD_ERASE | TEST_BAD_WRITE) -#define TEST_BAD_PREW (TEST_BAD_PROBE | TEST_BAD_READ | TEST_BAD_ERASE | TEST_BAD_WRITE) -#define TEST_BAD_MASK 0xf0 - /* Timing used in probe routines. ZERO is -2 to differentiate between an unset * field and zero delay. * @@ -265,12 +266,6 @@ int read_buf_from_file(unsigned char *buf, unsigned long size, const char *filename); int write_buf_to_file(const unsigned char *buf, unsigned long size, const char *filename); -enum test_state { - OK = 0, - NT = 1, /* Not tested */ - BAD -}; - /* Something happened that shouldn't happen, but we can go on. */ #define ERROR_NONFATAL 0x100 Modified: trunk/flashchips.c ============================================================================== --- trunk/flashchips.c Sun May 25 09:47:47 2014 (r1797) +++ trunk/flashchips.c Mon May 26 02:36:24 2014 (r1798) @@ -2189,7 +2189,7 @@ .model_id = ATMEL_AT26F004, .total_size = 512, .page_size = 256, - .tested = TEST_BAD_WRITE, + .tested = {.probe = NT, .read = NT, .erase = NT, .write = BAD }, .feature_bits = FEATURE_WRSR_WREN, .probe = probe_spi_rdid, .probe_timing = TIMING_ZERO, @@ -5915,7 +5915,7 @@ .model_id = MACRONIX_MX23L3254, .total_size = 4096, .page_size = 256, - .tested = TEST_OK_PR | TEST_BAD_EW, + .tested = {.probe = OK, .read = OK, .erase = NA, .write = NA}, .probe = probe_spi_rdid, .probe_timing = TIMING_ZERO, .write = NULL, /* MX23L3254 is a mask ROM, so it is read-only */ Modified: trunk/flashrom.c ============================================================================== --- trunk/flashrom.c Sun May 25 09:47:47 2014 (r1797) +++ trunk/flashrom.c Mon May 26 02:36:24 2014 (r1798) @@ -1791,32 +1791,43 @@ "clone the contents of this chip (see man page for " "details).\n"); } - if (TEST_OK_MASK != (chip->tested & TEST_OK_MASK)) { + + if ((chip->tested.erase == NA) && (chip->tested.write == NA)) { + msg_cdbg("This chip's main memory can not be erased/written by design.\n"); + } + + if ((chip->tested.probe == BAD) || (chip->tested.probe == NT) || + (chip->tested.read == BAD) || (chip->tested.read == NT) || + (chip->tested.erase == BAD) || (chip->tested.erase == NT) || + (chip->tested.write == BAD) || (chip->tested.write == NT)){ msg_cinfo("===\n"); - if (chip->tested & TEST_BAD_MASK) { + if ((chip->tested.probe == BAD) || + (chip->tested.read == BAD) || + (chip->tested.erase == BAD) || + (chip->tested.write == BAD)) { msg_cinfo("This flash part has status NOT WORKING for operations:"); - if (chip->tested & TEST_BAD_PROBE) + if (chip->tested.probe == BAD) msg_cinfo(" PROBE"); - if (chip->tested & TEST_BAD_READ) + if (chip->tested.read == BAD) msg_cinfo(" READ"); - if (chip->tested & TEST_BAD_ERASE) + if (chip->tested.erase == BAD) msg_cinfo(" ERASE"); - if (chip->tested & TEST_BAD_WRITE) + if (chip->tested.write == BAD) msg_cinfo(" WRITE"); msg_cinfo("\n"); } - if ((!(chip->tested & TEST_BAD_PROBE) && !(chip->tested & TEST_OK_PROBE)) || - (!(chip->tested & TEST_BAD_READ) && !(chip->tested & TEST_OK_READ)) || - (!(chip->tested & TEST_BAD_ERASE) && !(chip->tested & TEST_OK_ERASE)) || - (!(chip->tested & TEST_BAD_WRITE) && !(chip->tested & TEST_OK_WRITE))) { + if ((chip->tested.probe == NT) || + (chip->tested.read == NT) || + (chip->tested.erase == NT) || + (chip->tested.write == NT)) { msg_cinfo("This flash part has status UNTESTED for operations:"); - if (!(chip->tested & TEST_BAD_PROBE) && !(chip->tested & TEST_OK_PROBE)) + if (chip->tested.probe == NT) msg_cinfo(" PROBE"); - if (!(chip->tested & TEST_BAD_READ) && !(chip->tested & TEST_OK_READ)) + if (chip->tested.read == NT) msg_cinfo(" READ"); - if (!(chip->tested & TEST_BAD_ERASE) && !(chip->tested & TEST_OK_ERASE)) + if (chip->tested.erase == NT) msg_cinfo(" ERASE"); - if (!(chip->tested & TEST_BAD_WRITE) && !(chip->tested & TEST_OK_WRITE)) + if (chip->tested.write == NT) msg_cinfo(" WRITE"); msg_cinfo("\n"); } @@ -1859,7 +1870,7 @@ if (read_it || erase_it || write_it || verify_it) { /* Everything needs read. */ - if (chip->tested & TEST_BAD_READ) { + if (chip->tested.read == BAD) { msg_cerr("Read is not working on this chip. "); if (!force) return 1; @@ -1873,7 +1884,11 @@ } if (erase_it || write_it) { /* Write needs erase. */ - if (chip->tested & TEST_BAD_ERASE) { + if (chip->tested.erase == NA) { + msg_cerr("Erase is not possible on this chip.\n"); + return 1; + } + if (chip->tested.erase == BAD) { msg_cerr("Erase is not working on this chip. "); if (!force) return 1; @@ -1886,7 +1901,11 @@ } } if (write_it) { - if (chip->tested & TEST_BAD_WRITE) { + if (chip->tested.write == NA) { + msg_cerr("Write is not possible on this chip.\n"); + return 1; + } + if (chip->tested.write == BAD) { msg_cerr("Write is not working on this chip. "); if (!force) return 1; Modified: trunk/print.c ============================================================================== --- trunk/print.c Sun May 25 09:47:47 2014 (r1797) +++ trunk/print.c Mon May 26 02:36:24 2014 (r1798) @@ -249,38 +249,46 @@ for (i = curdevlen; i < maxchiplen; i++) msg_ginfo(" "); - if ((chip->tested & TEST_OK_PROBE)) + if (chip->tested.probe == OK) msg_ginfo("P"); + else if (chip->tested.probe == NA) + msg_ginfo("-"); else msg_ginfo(" "); - if ((chip->tested & TEST_OK_READ)) + if (chip->tested.read == OK) msg_ginfo("R"); + else if (chip->tested.read == NA) + msg_ginfo("-"); else msg_ginfo(" "); - if ((chip->tested & TEST_OK_ERASE)) + if (chip->tested.erase == OK) msg_ginfo("E"); + else if (chip->tested.erase == NA) + msg_ginfo("-"); else msg_ginfo(" "); - if ((chip->tested & TEST_OK_WRITE)) + if (chip->tested.write == OK) msg_ginfo("W"); + else if (chip->tested.write == NA) + msg_ginfo("-"); else msg_ginfo(" "); for (i = 0; i < border; i++) msg_ginfo(" "); - if ((chip->tested & TEST_BAD_PROBE)) + if (chip->tested.probe == BAD) msg_ginfo("P"); else msg_ginfo(" "); - if ((chip->tested & TEST_BAD_READ)) + if (chip->tested.read == BAD) msg_ginfo("R"); else msg_ginfo(" "); - if ((chip->tested & TEST_BAD_ERASE)) + if (chip->tested.erase == BAD) msg_ginfo("E"); else msg_ginfo(" "); - if ((chip->tested & TEST_BAD_WRITE)) + if (chip->tested.write == BAD) msg_ginfo("W"); else msg_ginfo(" "); Modified: trunk/print_wiki.c ============================================================================== --- trunk/print_wiki.c Sun May 25 09:47:47 2014 (r1797) +++ trunk/print_wiki.c Mon May 26 02:36:24 2014 (r1798) @@ -249,7 +249,6 @@ static void print_supported_chips_wiki(int cols) { unsigned int lines_per_col; - uint32_t t; char *s; char vmax[6]; char vmin[6]; @@ -287,7 +286,35 @@ c = !c; old = f; - t = f->tested; + const char *probe, *read, *write, *erase; + switch (f->tested.probe) { + case OK: probe = "OK"; break; + case BAD: probe = "No"; break; + case NA: probe = "NA"; break; + case DEP: probe = "Dep"; break; + default: probe = "?3"; break; + } + switch (f->tested.read) { + case OK: read = "OK"; break; + case BAD: read = "No"; break; + case NA: read = "NA"; break; + case DEP: read = "Dep"; break; + default: read = "?3"; break; + } + switch (f->tested.erase) { + case OK: erase = "OK"; break; + case BAD: erase = "No"; break; + case NA: erase = "NA"; break; + case DEP: erase = "Dep"; break; + default: erase = "?3"; break; + } + switch (f->tested.write) { + case OK: write = "OK"; break; + case BAD: write = "No"; break; + case NA: write = "NA"; break; + case DEP: write = "Dep"; break; + default: write = "?3"; break; + } s = flashbuses_to_text(f->bustype); sprintf(vmin, "%0.03f", f->voltage.min / (double)1000); sprintf(vmax, "%0.03f", f->voltage.max / (double)1000); @@ -298,16 +325,9 @@ "|| %s || %s \n", (c == 1) ? "eeeeee" : "dddddd", f->vendor, f->name, f->total_size, s, - (t & TEST_OK_PROBE) ? "OK" : - (t & TEST_BAD_PROBE) ? "No" : "?3", - (t & TEST_OK_READ) ? "OK" : - (t & TEST_BAD_READ) ? "No" : "?3", - (t & TEST_OK_ERASE) ? "OK" : - (t & TEST_BAD_ERASE) ? "No" : "?3", - (t & TEST_OK_WRITE) ? "OK" : - (t & TEST_BAD_WRITE) ? "No" : "?3", - f->voltage.min ? vmin : "N/A", - f->voltage.min ? vmax : "N/A"); + probe, read, erase, write, + f->voltage.min ? vmin : "?", + f->voltage.max ? vmax : "?"); free(s); if (((i % lines_per_col) + 1) == lines_per_col)

1 0

Support for Dediprog SF100 / Multiple dediprogs
by Mike Hibbett 25 May '14

25 May '14

Hi all, I'm interested in the support for the Dediprog SF100. I've built flashrom with the DEDIPROG config enabled; there was a slight issue with the build, however on running it, flashrom recognises my device but fails to read it ( or, is very, very slow. ) Also, I would be interested in multiple simultaneous dediprog device support. I have access to several programmers and a variety of motherboards Long term I will provide patches myself. Short term, I would be happy to provide test & debug support for anyone who is making changes in this area and does not have access to multiple programmers & device combinations. Regards, Mike.

2 3

[commit] r1797 - trunk
by repository service 25 May '14

25 May '14

Author: stefanct Date: Sun May 25 09:47:47 2014 New Revision: 1797 URL: http://flashrom.org/trac/flashrom/changeset/1797 Log: Constify dediprog's write functions too. I forgot doing so in r1789 which broke compiling the dediprog module with -Werror (which is default). Thanks to Mike Hibbett for reporting this. Signed-off-by: Stefan Tauner <stefan.tauner(a)alumni.tuwien.ac.at> Acked-by: Stefan Tauner <stefan.tauner(a)alumni.tuwien.ac.at> Modified: trunk/dediprog.c Modified: trunk/dediprog.c ============================================================================== --- trunk/dediprog.c Sun May 18 23:36:04 2014 (r1796) +++ trunk/dediprog.c Sun May 25 09:47:47 2014 (r1797) @@ -306,7 +306,7 @@ * @dedi_spi_cmd dediprog specific write command for spi bus * @return 0 on success, 1 on failure */ -static int dediprog_spi_bulk_write(struct flashctx *flash, uint8_t *buf, unsigned int chunksize, +static int dediprog_spi_bulk_write(struct flashctx *flash, const uint8_t *buf, unsigned int chunksize, unsigned int start, unsigned int len, uint8_t dedi_spi_cmd) { int ret; @@ -366,7 +366,7 @@ return 0; } -static int dediprog_spi_write(struct flashctx *flash, uint8_t *buf, +static int dediprog_spi_write(struct flashctx *flash, const uint8_t *buf, unsigned int start, unsigned int len, uint8_t dedi_spi_cmd) { int ret; @@ -418,12 +418,12 @@ return 0; } -static int dediprog_spi_write_256(struct flashctx *flash, uint8_t *buf, unsigned int start, unsigned int len) +static int dediprog_spi_write_256(struct flashctx *flash, const uint8_t *buf, unsigned int start, unsigned int len) { return dediprog_spi_write(flash, buf, start, len, DEDI_SPI_CMD_PAGEWRITE); } -static int dediprog_spi_write_aai(struct flashctx *flash, uint8_t *buf, unsigned int start, unsigned int len) +static int dediprog_spi_write_aai(struct flashctx *flash, const uint8_t *buf, unsigned int start, unsigned int len) { return dediprog_spi_write(flash, buf, start, len, DEDI_SPI_CMD_AAIWRITE); }

1 0

about MX29GL128EHT2i-90G
by Gilbert Klzo 24 May '14

24 May '14

Hi I would like to find out when flashrom gonna be capable to work with this parallel flash. MX29GL128EHT2i-90G Or MX29GL128EH Kind Regards Gilbert

2 3

Re: [flashrom] Flashrom and KT4V in 2014
by Stefan Tauner 23 May '14

23 May '14

Hi Ronald, thanks for your report. There are various reasons why this can happen. It is not necessarily a sign that the board can not be upgraded with flashrom. A verbose flashrom log could give some additional hints... -- Kind regards/Mit freundlichen Grüßen, Stefan Tauner

2 1

A couple of bugs..
by Mike Hibbett 21 May '14

21 May '14

I spotted these two in yesterday's code base. I'm not likely to commit code anytime soon so I will leave it to someone else to pick up if they are interested. src/vendorcode/intel/fsp/baytrail/include/fspplatform.h:78 Duplicate declaration of GetFspReservedMemoryFromGuid src/northbridge/intel/fsp_sandybridge/fsp/chipset_fsp_util.c:92 GetUpdDefaultFromFsp (fsp_ptr, fsp_upd_data);/home/martin/extra/git/coreboot Maybe martin would like to fix that one :o) Mike

2 2

Re: [flashrom] Flashrom Windows Port Status
by Idwer Vollering 20 May '14

20 May '14

2014-05-20 16:49 GMT+02:00 Darmawan Salihun <darmawan.salihun(a)gmail.com>: > Hi, > > I've read over at http://flashrom.org/Downloads that the latest > Windows port only supports flashing via USB or FTDI. Downloaded from > Idwer's site and see that only flashing via both interfaces are > supported via libftdi.dll and libusb0_x86.dll. > > I want to confirm whether this is exactly the latest status of the > Windows port? The download you have found is 'just' a crosscompiled .exe that only supports external (USB) programmers. You might have found the DirectHW project [1], however Windows support is pending: http://review.coreboot.org/gitweb?p=directhw.git;a=blob_plain;f=windows/REA… [1] http://www.coreboot.org/DirectHW > > Kind Regards, > > Darmawan > -------------------------------------------------------------------- > -= Знания людей принадлежат миру =- > [-Human knowledge belongs to the world-] > > _______________________________________________ > flashrom mailing list > flashrom(a)flashrom.org > http://www.flashrom.org/mailman/listinfo/flashrom

1 0

Flashrom Windows Port Status
by Darmawan Salihun 20 May '14

20 May '14

Hi, I've read over at http://flashrom.org/Downloads that the latest Windows port only supports flashing via USB or FTDI. Downloaded from Idwer's site and see that only flashing via both interfaces are supported via libftdi.dll and libusb0_x86.dll. I want to confirm whether this is exactly the latest status of the Windows port? Kind Regards, Darmawan -------------------------------------------------------------------- -= Знания людей принадлежат миру =- [-Human knowledge belongs to the world-]

1 0

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

flashrom