Attention is currently required from: Aarya, Anastasia Klimchuk, Bill XIE.
Peter Marheine has posted comments on this change by Bill XIE. ( https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/84721?usp=email )
Change subject: erasure_layout: Add an option to sacrifice unchanged blocks for speed ......................................................................
Patch Set 10:
(2 comments)
File doc/classic_cli_manpage.rst:
https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/84721/comment/a3d79336_431c45f2?usp... : PS10, Line 23: | [-V[V[V]]] [-o <logfile>] [--progress][--sacrifice-ratio <ratio>] Add a space between flags.
```suggestion | [-V[V[V]]] [-o <logfile>] [--progress] [--sacrifice-ratio <ratio>] ```
File doc/release_notes/devel.rst:
https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/84721/comment/905d7b53_a095bf8a?usp... : PS10, Line 57: didn't need to be erased. Which means, the chip, as a hardware, will : wear faster. : : New command line option sets the maximum % memory that is allowed for : redundant erase. Default is 0, S+1 size block only selected if all the : area needs to be erased in full. 50 means that if more than a half of : the area needs to be erased, a S+1 size block can be selected to cover : all area with one block. Small rewording suggestions.
```suggestion didn't need to be erased. Which means the physical chip will wear out faster.
This new option sets the maximum % of memory that is allowed for redundant erase. Default is 0, S+1 size block only selected if all the area needs to be erased in full. 50 means that if more than a half of the area needs to be erased, a S+1 size block can be selected to cover the entire area with one block. ```