Attention is currently required from: Alexander Goncharov, Patrick Georgi, Stefan Reinauer, Thomas Heijligen.
Anastasia Klimchuk has posted comments on this change. ( https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/75727?usp=email )
Change subject: doc: Add documentation license ......................................................................
Patch Set 3:
(3 comments)
Patchset:
PS1:
As we discussed on the meeting, this page should be sufficient.
Marking as unresolved, so that Patrick could have a look and confirm.
File doc/documentation_license.rst:
https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/75727/comment/ae1d1acf_1d1d7608 : PS3, Line 2: flashrom documentation license
How about just `Documentation license`?
Initially I copied from coreboot's page https://doc.coreboot.org/documentation_license.html I assume they did it right. I am not sure this is critical, maybe both ways is fine: let's confirm with people who know better. The things with legal stuff (which this page) is that it often needs to be done in the exact way, so I was copying from the example as close as possible.
https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/75727/comment/4453e473_182c0e90 : PS3, Line 5: doc/
We also have "Documentation" directory in our tree. […]
`Documentation` directory is probably under GPLv2 which is what everything in the tree was. And still is, but we can set CC-BY for new docs. I don't think we can just change the license for existing directory... and given that it will be removed maybe let's not bother with this.
-
Anastasia Klimchuk (Code Review)