Anastasia Klimchuk has uploaded this change for review. ( https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/75744?usp=email )
Change subject: flash: Update the comment for flashchip eraseblocks ......................................................................
flash: Update the comment for flashchip eraseblocks
Change-Id: Ica7790667ac4c1baf961cb7a330e08178e2c0c28 Signed-off-by: Anastasia Klimchuk aklm@chromium.org --- M include/flash.h 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)
git pull ssh://review.coreboot.org:29418/flashrom refs/changes/44/75744/1
diff --git a/include/flash.h b/include/flash.h index 0eace15..4c08549 100644 --- a/include/flash.h +++ b/include/flash.h @@ -449,9 +449,7 @@ /* * Erase blocks and associated erase function. Any chip erase function * is stored as chip-sized virtual block together with said function. - * The first one that fits will be chosen. There is currently no way to - * influence that behaviour. For testing just comment out the other - * elements or set the function pointer to NULL. + * The logic for how to optimally select erase functions is in erasure_layout.c */ struct block_eraser { struct eraseblock {