Anastasia Klimchuk has uploaded this change for review.

View Change

flash: Update the comment for flashchip eraseblocks

Change-Id: Ica7790667ac4c1baf961cb7a330e08178e2c0c28
Signed-off-by: Anastasia Klimchuk <aklm@chromium.org>
---
M include/flash.h
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)

git pull ssh://review.coreboot.org:29418/flashrom refs/changes/44/75744/1

diff --git a/include/flash.h b/include/flash.h
index 0eace15..4c08549 100644
--- a/include/flash.h
+++ b/include/flash.h
@@ -449,9 +449,7 @@
 	/*
 	 * Erase blocks and associated erase function. Any chip erase function
 	 * is stored as chip-sized virtual block together with said function.
-	 * The first one that fits will be chosen. There is currently no way to
-	 * influence that behaviour. For testing just comment out the other
-	 * elements or set the function pointer to NULL.
+	 * The logic for how to optimally select erase functions is in erasure_layout.c
 	 */
 	struct block_eraser {
 		struct eraseblock {

To view, visit change 75744. To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit settings.