Attention is currently required from: Nico Huber, Subrata Banik, Paul Menzel, Angel Pons.
Anastasia Klimchuk has posted comments on this change. ( https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/62867 )
Change subject: ichspi: Unify timeout (30sec) across all SPI operations
......................................................................
Patch Set 7:
(1 comment)
Patchset:
PS5:
Just curious, what was the reason for using two different timeouts? […]
Oh I was referring to previous code,
ich_hwseq_block_erase had `uint32_t timeout = 5000 * 1000;`
and for example in
ich_hwseq_write had `uint16_t timeout = 100 * 60;`
tow different values.
and now this patch makes the same timeout everywhere. So I was wondering why there were different values before?
--
To view, visit
https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/62867
To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit
https://review.coreboot.org/settings
Gerrit-Project: flashrom
Gerrit-Branch: master
Gerrit-Change-Id: Ifa910dea794175d8ee2ad277549e5a0d69cba45b
Gerrit-Change-Number: 62867
Gerrit-PatchSet: 7
Gerrit-Owner: Subrata Banik
subratabanik@google.com
Gerrit-Reviewer: Anastasia Klimchuk
aklm@chromium.org
Gerrit-Reviewer: Angel Pons
th3fanbus@gmail.com
Gerrit-Reviewer: Edward O'Callaghan
quasisec@chromium.org
Gerrit-Reviewer: Nico Huber
nico.h@gmx.de
Gerrit-Reviewer: build bot (Jenkins)
no-reply@coreboot.org
Gerrit-CC: Paul Menzel
paulepanter@mailbox.org
Gerrit-Attention: Nico Huber
nico.h@gmx.de
Gerrit-Attention: Subrata Banik
subratabanik@google.com
Gerrit-Attention: Paul Menzel
paulepanter@mailbox.org
Gerrit-Attention: Angel Pons
th3fanbus@gmail.com
Gerrit-Comment-Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2022 04:26:29 +0000
Gerrit-HasComments: Yes
Gerrit-Has-Labels: No
Comment-In-Reply-To: Subrata Banik
subratabanik@google.com
Comment-In-Reply-To: Anastasia Klimchuk
aklm@chromium.org
Gerrit-MessageType: comment