Attention is currently required from: Nico Huber, Subrata Banik, Paul Menzel, Angel Pons.

View Change

1 comment:

• Patchset:

  • Patch Set #5:

    > Just curious, what was the reason for using two different timeouts? […]

    Oh I was referring to previous code,

    ich_hwseq_block_erase had `uint32_t timeout = 5000 * 1000;`
    and for example in
    ich_hwseq_write had `uint16_t timeout = 100 * 60;`
    tow different values.

    and now this patch makes the same timeout everywhere. So I was wondering why there were different values before?

To view, visit change 62867. To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit settings.