September 2024 - flashrom-gerrit

Change in flashrom[master]: libflashrom.map: Add missing symbols
by Edward O'Callaghan (Code Review) 07 Apr '25

07 Apr '25

Edward O'Callaghan has uploaded this change for review. ( https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/38993 ) Change subject: libflashrom.map: Add missing symbols ...................................................................... libflashrom.map: Add missing symbols The following symbols were missing at link-time from libflashrom: supported_flash_chips; supported_boards; supported_chipsets; Change-Id: I299928d62788c0abfe7f6cdd3e8ad8be0c49e45e Signed-off-by: Edward O'Callaghan <quasisec(a)google.com> --- M libflashrom.map 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) git pull ssh://review.coreboot.org:29418/flashrom refs/changes/93/38993/1 diff --git a/libflashrom.map b/libflashrom.map index d6dd24d..9430775 100644 --- a/libflashrom.map +++ b/libflashrom.map @@ -25,6 +25,9 @@ flashrom_set_log_callback; flashrom_shutdown; flashrom_supported_programmers; + flashrom_supported_flash_chips; + flashrom_supported_boards; + flashrom_supported_chipsets; flashrom_system_info; flashrom_version_info; local: *; -- To view, visit https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/38993 To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit https://review.coreboot.org/settings Gerrit-Project: flashrom Gerrit-Branch: master Gerrit-Change-Id: I299928d62788c0abfe7f6cdd3e8ad8be0c49e45e Gerrit-Change-Number: 38993 Gerrit-PatchSet: 1 Gerrit-Owner: Edward O'Callaghan <quasisec(a)chromium.org> Gerrit-MessageType: newchange

4 3

[XS] Change in flashrom[main]: ichspi: Probe opcode in POSSIBLE_OPCODES[] as well
by Bill XIE (Code Review) 30 Sep '24

30 Sep '24

Attention is currently required from: Anastasia Klimchuk, Nikolai Artemiev, Peter Marheine. Hello Anastasia Klimchuk, Nikolai Artemiev, Peter Marheine, build bot (Jenkins), I'd like you to reexamine a change. Please visit https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/84253?usp=email to look at the new patch set (#5). The following approvals got outdated and were removed: Verified+1 by build bot (Jenkins) Change subject: ichspi: Probe opcode in POSSIBLE_OPCODES[] as well ...................................................................... ichspi: Probe opcode in POSSIBLE_OPCODES[] as well ich_spi_send_command() and ich_spi_send_multicommand() will overwrite the "Sector erase" opcode with the opcode for command via reprogram_opcode_on_the_fly(), but not restore it, causing the "Sector erase" opcode may get lost after sending commands, leaving only "Bulk erase" opcode which erase the whole chip available. In the mean time, ich_spi_probe_opcode() used not to report opcodes in POSSIBLE_OPCODES[] but not in curopcodes->opcode[] as supported. Now, if the opcode being probed is not in curopcodes->opcode[] but in POSSIBLE_OPCODES[], it will be reported as supported, and programmed later by ich_spi_send_(multi)command(). Fix:https://ticket.coreboot.org/issues/556 Change-Id: I3fc831fc072e2af9265835cb2f71bf8c222c6a64 Signed-off-by: persmule <persmule(a)hardenedlinux.org> --- M ichspi.c 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) git pull ssh://review.coreboot.org:29418/flashrom refs/changes/53/84253/5 -- To view, visit https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/84253?usp=email To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit https://review.coreboot.org/settings?usp=email Gerrit-MessageType: newpatchset Gerrit-Project: flashrom Gerrit-Branch: main Gerrit-Change-Id: I3fc831fc072e2af9265835cb2f71bf8c222c6a64 Gerrit-Change-Number: 84253 Gerrit-PatchSet: 5 Gerrit-Owner: Bill XIE <persmule(a)hardenedlinux.org> Gerrit-Reviewer: Anastasia Klimchuk <aklm(a)chromium.org> Gerrit-Reviewer: Nikolai Artemiev <nartemiev(a)google.com> Gerrit-Reviewer: Peter Marheine <pmarheine(a)chromium.org> Gerrit-Reviewer: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply(a)coreboot.org> Gerrit-Attention: Anastasia Klimchuk <aklm(a)chromium.org> Gerrit-Attention: Nikolai Artemiev <nartemiev(a)google.com> Gerrit-Attention: Peter Marheine <pmarheine(a)chromium.org>

1 0

[XS] Change in flashrom[main]: ichspi: Probe opcode in POSSIBLE_OPCODES[] as well
by Bill XIE (Code Review) 30 Sep '24

30 Sep '24

Attention is currently required from: Anastasia Klimchuk, Nikolai Artemiev, Peter Marheine. Bill XIE has posted comments on this change by Bill XIE. ( https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/84253?usp=email ) Change subject: ichspi: Probe opcode in POSSIBLE_OPCODES[] as well ...................................................................... Patch Set 4: (1 comment) File ichspi.c: https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/84253/comment/b3b4f9c5_83e52c40?us… : PS1, Line 1843: : static bool ich_spi_probe_opcode(const struct flashctx *flash, uint8_t opcode) : { : return find_opcode(curopcodes, opcode) >= 0; > Please show me your elegant solution to program other erasing opcodes on the fly, but not before CB: […] I managed to make up a solution to program an erase opcode being probed if it is in the POSSIBLE_OPCODES during ich_spi_probe_opcode(). -- To view, visit https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/84253?usp=email To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit https://review.coreboot.org/settings?usp=email Gerrit-MessageType: comment Gerrit-Project: flashrom Gerrit-Branch: main Gerrit-Change-Id: I3fc831fc072e2af9265835cb2f71bf8c222c6a64 Gerrit-Change-Number: 84253 Gerrit-PatchSet: 4 Gerrit-Owner: Bill XIE <persmule(a)hardenedlinux.org> Gerrit-Reviewer: Anastasia Klimchuk <aklm(a)chromium.org> Gerrit-Reviewer: Nikolai Artemiev <nartemiev(a)google.com> Gerrit-Reviewer: Peter Marheine <pmarheine(a)chromium.org> Gerrit-Reviewer: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply(a)coreboot.org> Gerrit-Attention: Anastasia Klimchuk <aklm(a)chromium.org> Gerrit-Attention: Nikolai Artemiev <nartemiev(a)google.com> Gerrit-Attention: Peter Marheine <pmarheine(a)chromium.org> Gerrit-Comment-Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2024 09:58:55 +0000 Gerrit-HasComments: Yes Gerrit-Has-Labels: No Comment-In-Reply-To: Bill XIE <persmule(a)hardenedlinux.org> Comment-In-Reply-To: Anastasia Klimchuk <aklm(a)chromium.org> Comment-In-Reply-To: Nikolai Artemiev <nartemiev(a)google.com>

1 0

[XS] Change in flashrom[main]: ichspi: const-correct POSSIBLE_OPCODES[]
by Bill XIE (Code Review) 30 Sep '24

30 Sep '24

Bill XIE has uploaded this change for review. ( https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/84595?usp=email ) Change subject: ichspi: const-correct POSSIBLE_OPCODES[] ...................................................................... ichspi: const-correct POSSIBLE_OPCODES[] POSSIBLE_OPCODES[] is never modified, so mark it as read-only. Change-Id: I217f8a9e50b9e2e9f2731adec89a46780874c754 Signed-off-by: persmule <persmule(a)hardenedlinux.org> --- M ichspi.c 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) git pull ssh://review.coreboot.org:29418/flashrom refs/changes/95/84595/1 diff --git a/ichspi.c b/ichspi.c index 358d9f4..d53e671 100644 --- a/ichspi.c +++ b/ichspi.c @@ -399,7 +399,7 @@ * It is used to reprogram the chipset OPCODE table on-the-fly if an opcode * is needed which is currently not in the chipset OPCODE table */ -static OPCODE POSSIBLE_OPCODES[] = { +static const OPCODE POSSIBLE_OPCODES[] = { {JEDEC_BYTE_PROGRAM, SPI_OPCODE_TYPE_WRITE_WITH_ADDRESS, 0}, // Write Byte {JEDEC_READ, SPI_OPCODE_TYPE_READ_WITH_ADDRESS, 0}, // Read Data {JEDEC_BE_D8, SPI_OPCODE_TYPE_WRITE_WITH_ADDRESS, 0}, // Erase Sector -- To view, visit https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/84595?usp=email To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit https://review.coreboot.org/settings?usp=email Gerrit-MessageType: newchange Gerrit-Project: flashrom Gerrit-Branch: main Gerrit-Change-Id: I217f8a9e50b9e2e9f2731adec89a46780874c754 Gerrit-Change-Number: 84595 Gerrit-PatchSet: 1 Gerrit-Owner: Bill XIE <persmule(a)hardenedlinux.org>

1 0

[XS] Change in flashrom[main]: ichspi: Probe opcode in POSSIBLE_OPCODES[] as well
by Bill XIE (Code Review) 30 Sep '24

30 Sep '24

Attention is currently required from: Anastasia Klimchuk, Nikolai Artemiev, Peter Marheine. Hello Anastasia Klimchuk, Nikolai Artemiev, Peter Marheine, build bot (Jenkins), I'd like you to reexamine a change. Please visit https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/84253?usp=email to look at the new patch set (#4). The following approvals got outdated and were removed: Verified+1 by build bot (Jenkins) Change subject: ichspi: Probe opcode in POSSIBLE_OPCODES[] as well ...................................................................... ichspi: Probe opcode in POSSIBLE_OPCODES[] as well ich_spi_send_command() and ich_spi_send_multicommand() will overwrite the "Sector erase" opcode with the opcode for command via reprogram_opcode_on_the_fly(), but not restore it, causing the "Sector erase" opcode may get lost after sending commands, leaving only "Bulk erase" opcode which erase the whole chip available. In the mean time, ich_spi_probe_opcode() used not to report opcodes in POSSIBLE_OPCODES[] but not in curopcodes->opcode[] as supported. Now, if the opcode being probed is not in curopcodes->opcode[] but in POSSIBLE_OPCODES[], it will be programmed on-the fly, and reported as supported if successfully programmed. Fix:https://ticket.coreboot.org/issues/556 Change-Id: I3fc831fc072e2af9265835cb2f71bf8c222c6a64 Signed-off-by: persmule <persmule(a)hardenedlinux.org> --- M ichspi.c 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) git pull ssh://review.coreboot.org:29418/flashrom refs/changes/53/84253/4 -- To view, visit https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/84253?usp=email To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit https://review.coreboot.org/settings?usp=email Gerrit-MessageType: newpatchset Gerrit-Project: flashrom Gerrit-Branch: main Gerrit-Change-Id: I3fc831fc072e2af9265835cb2f71bf8c222c6a64 Gerrit-Change-Number: 84253 Gerrit-PatchSet: 4 Gerrit-Owner: Bill XIE <persmule(a)hardenedlinux.org> Gerrit-Reviewer: Anastasia Klimchuk <aklm(a)chromium.org> Gerrit-Reviewer: Nikolai Artemiev <nartemiev(a)google.com> Gerrit-Reviewer: Peter Marheine <pmarheine(a)chromium.org> Gerrit-Reviewer: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply(a)coreboot.org> Gerrit-Attention: Anastasia Klimchuk <aklm(a)chromium.org> Gerrit-Attention: Nikolai Artemiev <nartemiev(a)google.com> Gerrit-Attention: Peter Marheine <pmarheine(a)chromium.org>

1 0

[S] Change in flashrom[main]: ichspi: Restore Sector erase opcode after send command
by Bill XIE (Code Review) 30 Sep '24

30 Sep '24

Attention is currently required from: Anastasia Klimchuk, Nikolai Artemiev, Peter Marheine. Bill XIE has posted comments on this change by Bill XIE. ( https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/84253?usp=email ) Change subject: ichspi: Restore Sector erase opcode after send command ...................................................................... Patch Set 3: (1 comment) File ichspi.c: https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/84253/comment/c2458138_26d3c0f0?us… : PS1, Line 1843: : static bool ich_spi_probe_opcode(const struct flashctx *flash, uint8_t opcode) : { : return find_opcode(curopcodes, opcode) >= 0; > > That way, ich_spi_send_command will automatically reprogram the required opcode if it is missing a […] Please show me your elegant solution to program other erasing opcodes on the fly, but not before CB:84567 and CB:84593. ;-) -- To view, visit https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/84253?usp=email To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit https://review.coreboot.org/settings?usp=email Gerrit-MessageType: comment Gerrit-Project: flashrom Gerrit-Branch: main Gerrit-Change-Id: I3fc831fc072e2af9265835cb2f71bf8c222c6a64 Gerrit-Change-Number: 84253 Gerrit-PatchSet: 3 Gerrit-Owner: Bill XIE <persmule(a)hardenedlinux.org> Gerrit-Reviewer: Anastasia Klimchuk <aklm(a)chromium.org> Gerrit-Reviewer: Nikolai Artemiev <nartemiev(a)google.com> Gerrit-Reviewer: Peter Marheine <pmarheine(a)chromium.org> Gerrit-Reviewer: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply(a)coreboot.org> Gerrit-Attention: Anastasia Klimchuk <aklm(a)chromium.org> Gerrit-Attention: Nikolai Artemiev <nartemiev(a)google.com> Gerrit-Attention: Peter Marheine <pmarheine(a)chromium.org> Gerrit-Comment-Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2024 08:16:17 +0000 Gerrit-HasComments: Yes Gerrit-Has-Labels: No Comment-In-Reply-To: Bill XIE <persmule(a)hardenedlinux.org> Comment-In-Reply-To: Anastasia Klimchuk <aklm(a)chromium.org> Comment-In-Reply-To: Nikolai Artemiev <nartemiev(a)google.com>

1 0

[S] Change in flashrom[main]: ichspi: Merge spi_master implementations for Intel ich
by Bill XIE (Code Review) 30 Sep '24

30 Sep '24

Bill XIE has uploaded this change for review. ( https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/84593?usp=email ) Change subject: ichspi: Merge spi_master implementations for Intel ich ...................................................................... ichspi: Merge spi_master implementations for Intel ich There seems no problem to use ich_spi_probe_opcode() for spi_master::probe_opcode() on ich7, so we may merge former spi_master_ich7 and spi_master_ich9 into spi_master_ich, for both init_ich7_spi() and init_ich_default(). Change-Id: I6a65c97e910622a55da7cef8a10de3af6a99c9e8 Signed-off-by: persmule <persmule(a)hardenedlinux.org> --- M ichspi.c 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-) git pull ssh://review.coreboot.org:29418/flashrom refs/changes/93/84593/1 diff --git a/ichspi.c b/ichspi.c index d01f2f3..e9de3b7 100644 --- a/ichspi.c +++ b/ichspi.c @@ -1991,18 +1991,7 @@ msg_gspew("resulted in 0x%08"PRIx32".\n", mmio_readl(addr)); } -static const struct spi_master spi_master_ich7 = { - .max_data_read = 64, - .max_data_write = 64, - .command = ich_spi_send_command, - .multicommand = ich_spi_send_multicommand, - .map_flash_region = physmap, - .unmap_flash_region = physunmap, - .read = default_spi_read, - .write_256 = default_spi_write_256, -}; - -static const struct spi_master spi_master_ich9 = { +static const struct spi_master spi_master_ich = { .max_data_read = 64, .max_data_write = 64, .command = ich_spi_send_command, @@ -2054,7 +2043,7 @@ } ich_init_opcodes(ich_gen); ich_set_bbar(0, ich_gen); - register_spi_master(&spi_master_ich7, NULL); + register_spi_master(&spi_master_ich, NULL); return 0; } @@ -2420,7 +2409,7 @@ memcpy(opaque_hwseq_data, &hwseq_data, sizeof(*opaque_hwseq_data)); register_opaque_master(&opaque_master_ich_hwseq, opaque_hwseq_data); } else { - register_spi_master(&spi_master_ich9, NULL); + register_spi_master(&spi_master_ich, NULL); } return 0; -- To view, visit https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/84593?usp=email To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit https://review.coreboot.org/settings?usp=email Gerrit-MessageType: newchange Gerrit-Project: flashrom Gerrit-Branch: main Gerrit-Change-Id: I6a65c97e910622a55da7cef8a10de3af6a99c9e8 Gerrit-Change-Number: 84593 Gerrit-PatchSet: 1 Gerrit-Owner: Bill XIE <persmule(a)hardenedlinux.org>

1 0

[S] Change in flashrom[main]: ichspi: Restore Sector erase opcode after send command
by Bill XIE (Code Review) 30 Sep '24

30 Sep '24

Attention is currently required from: Anastasia Klimchuk, Nikolai Artemiev, Peter Marheine. Bill XIE has posted comments on this change by Bill XIE. ( https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/84253?usp=email ) Change subject: ichspi: Restore Sector erase opcode after send command ...................................................................... Patch Set 1: (1 comment) File ichspi.c: https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/84253/comment/c9fb1e05_31547cef?us… : PS1, Line 2078: reg However, is it okay to just use spi_master_ich9 here? (maybe after renaming it to "spi_master_ich79" or something, identical to use ich_spi_probe_opcode() for .probe_opcode() for ich7 as well) -- To view, visit https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/84253?usp=email To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit https://review.coreboot.org/settings?usp=email Gerrit-MessageType: comment Gerrit-Project: flashrom Gerrit-Branch: main Gerrit-Change-Id: I3fc831fc072e2af9265835cb2f71bf8c222c6a64 Gerrit-Change-Number: 84253 Gerrit-PatchSet: 1 Gerrit-Owner: Bill XIE <persmule(a)hardenedlinux.org> Gerrit-Reviewer: Anastasia Klimchuk <aklm(a)chromium.org> Gerrit-Reviewer: Nikolai Artemiev <nartemiev(a)google.com> Gerrit-Reviewer: Peter Marheine <pmarheine(a)chromium.org> Gerrit-Reviewer: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply(a)coreboot.org> Gerrit-Attention: Anastasia Klimchuk <aklm(a)chromium.org> Gerrit-Attention: Nikolai Artemiev <nartemiev(a)google.com> Gerrit-Attention: Peter Marheine <pmarheine(a)chromium.org> Gerrit-Comment-Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2024 06:58:48 +0000 Gerrit-HasComments: Yes Gerrit-Has-Labels: No

1 0

[S] Change in flashrom[main]: ichspi: Restore Sector erase opcode after send command
by Bill XIE (Code Review) 30 Sep '24

30 Sep '24

Attention is currently required from: Anastasia Klimchuk, Nikolai Artemiev, Peter Marheine. Bill XIE has posted comments on this change by Bill XIE. ( https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/84253?usp=email ) Change subject: ichspi: Restore Sector erase opcode after send command ...................................................................... Patch Set 1: (1 comment) File ichspi.c: https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/84253/comment/6ddd8e0f_f7111307?us… : PS1, Line 1843: : static bool ich_spi_probe_opcode(const struct flashctx *flash, uint8_t opcode) : { : return find_opcode(curopcodes, opcode) >= 0; > That way, ich_spi_send_command will automatically reprogram the required opcode if it is missing and we don't have to restore JEDEC_SE after every command that reprograms it. I have once considered this, but the issue is that spi_master_ich7 does use ich_spi_send_(multi)command() but does not implement .probe_opcode(). > Bill, would you agree to change your patch, and test the different solution? As a plan B I can upload new version of the patch, but asking you first because you are the author (and you did all the debugging). Also, in any case, original author of the patch stays (even if someone uploads new version) If you have a better solution, you are free to replace mine. -- To view, visit https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/84253?usp=email To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit https://review.coreboot.org/settings?usp=email Gerrit-MessageType: comment Gerrit-Project: flashrom Gerrit-Branch: main Gerrit-Change-Id: I3fc831fc072e2af9265835cb2f71bf8c222c6a64 Gerrit-Change-Number: 84253 Gerrit-PatchSet: 1 Gerrit-Owner: Bill XIE <persmule(a)hardenedlinux.org> Gerrit-Reviewer: Anastasia Klimchuk <aklm(a)chromium.org> Gerrit-Reviewer: Nikolai Artemiev <nartemiev(a)google.com> Gerrit-Reviewer: Peter Marheine <pmarheine(a)chromium.org> Gerrit-Reviewer: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply(a)coreboot.org> Gerrit-Attention: Anastasia Klimchuk <aklm(a)chromium.org> Gerrit-Attention: Nikolai Artemiev <nartemiev(a)google.com> Gerrit-Attention: Peter Marheine <pmarheine(a)chromium.org> Gerrit-Comment-Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2024 06:49:18 +0000 Gerrit-HasComments: Yes Gerrit-Has-Labels: No Comment-In-Reply-To: Anastasia Klimchuk <aklm(a)chromium.org> Comment-In-Reply-To: Nikolai Artemiev <nartemiev(a)google.com>

1 0

[L] Change in flashrom[main]: Complete and fix progress feature implementation for all operations
by Sergii Dmytruk (Code Review) 29 Sep '24

29 Sep '24

Attention is currently required from: Aarya, Anastasia Klimchuk, Nikolai Artemiev. Sergii Dmytruk has posted comments on this change by Sergii Dmytruk. ( https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/84102?usp=email ) Change subject: Complete and fix progress feature implementation for all operations ...................................................................... Patch Set 5: (4 comments) File cli_output.c: https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/84102/comment/43390002_53a3d3a8?us… : PS4, Line 119: 16 * FLASHROM_PROGRESS_NR For 100% it will be 13 chars which I rounded to 16. `\b \b` is: 1. Move cursor to the left 2. Print space to overwrite what is under the cursor (or to its right depending on cursor's shape) 3. Move cursor to the left again > Does this relate to the part in commit message: No, that's a separate thing. > But the concern is still valid right? Yes, but I just saw that it's not a real problem. A flag indicating that something was printed can be set in `flashrom_print_cb()` below and reset after printing a progress here. If the flag is set when this function is called, need to move to a new line (ideally would know whether last print included a new line or not), otherwise can just erase previous progress. File flashrom.c: https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/84102/comment/b195d54f_ff781022?us… : PS5, Line 1235: /* const size_t flash_size = flashctx->chip->total_size * 1024; */ : /* const size_t page_size = flashctx->chip->page_size; */ > I think I can remove these lines Sure. https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/84102/comment/8574887a_14b1a599?us… : PS5, Line 1958: init_progress(flashctx, FLASHROM_PROGRESS_READ, flash_size); // WTF? > What was your concern on this line? Was something not working? (see line comment) I think it was before addressing progress reporting on SPI reads, so adding this line caused progress to reach 200%. File include/flash.h: https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/84102/comment/02956254_20130dd4?us… : PS1, Line 587: struct stage_progress stage_progress[FLASHROM_PROGRESS_NR]; > I think (I think) I understand. […] From the client side, yes. Also, this change switches from programmers reporting total and current position to them reporting amount of processed data, so the total and current values need to be stored somewhere and this is where it's stored. -- To view, visit https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/84102?usp=email To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit https://review.coreboot.org/settings?usp=email Gerrit-MessageType: comment Gerrit-Project: flashrom Gerrit-Branch: main Gerrit-Change-Id: If1e40fc97f443c4f0c0501cef11cff1f3f84c051 Gerrit-Change-Number: 84102 Gerrit-PatchSet: 5 Gerrit-Owner: Sergii Dmytruk <sergii.dmytruk(a)3mdeb.com> Gerrit-Reviewer: Aarya <aarya.chaumal(a)gmail.com> Gerrit-Reviewer: Anastasia Klimchuk <aklm(a)chromium.org> Gerrit-Reviewer: Nikolai Artemiev <nartemiev(a)google.com> Gerrit-Reviewer: Peter Marheine <pmarheine(a)chromium.org> Gerrit-Reviewer: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply(a)coreboot.org> Gerrit-Attention: Aarya <aarya.chaumal(a)gmail.com> Gerrit-Attention: Anastasia Klimchuk <aklm(a)chromium.org> Gerrit-Attention: Nikolai Artemiev <nartemiev(a)google.com> Gerrit-Comment-Date: Sun, 29 Sep 2024 12:07:49 +0000 Gerrit-HasComments: Yes Gerrit-Has-Labels: No Comment-In-Reply-To: Anastasia Klimchuk <aklm(a)chromium.org> Comment-In-Reply-To: Sergii Dmytruk <sergii.dmytruk(a)3mdeb.com>

1 0

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

flashrom-gerrit September 2024