April 2022 - flashrom-gerrit - mail.coreboot.org

Change in flashrom[master]: build: Remove cli_classic need for internal symbols [WIP]
by Edward O'Callaghan (Code Review) 19 Apr '22

19 Apr '22

Edward O'Callaghan has posted comments on this change. ( https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/60074 ) Change subject: build: Remove cli_classic need for internal symbols [WIP] ...................................................................... Patch Set 7: -Code-Review -- To view, visit https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/60074 To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit https://review.coreboot.org/settings Gerrit-Project: flashrom Gerrit-Branch: master Gerrit-Change-Id: Ib04293c14f53c8e798c7d3e35483067520668161 Gerrit-Change-Number: 60074 Gerrit-PatchSet: 7 Gerrit-Owner: Edward O'Callaghan <quasisec(a)chromium.org> Gerrit-Reviewer: Edward O'Callaghan <quasisec(a)chromium.org> Gerrit-Reviewer: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply(a)coreboot.org> Gerrit-CC: Anastasia Klimchuk <aklm(a)chromium.org> Gerrit-CC: Paul Menzel <paulepanter(a)mailbox.org> Gerrit-CC: Thomas Heijligen <src(a)posteo.de> Gerrit-Comment-Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2022 04:11:40 +0000 Gerrit-HasComments: No Gerrit-Has-Labels: Yes Gerrit-MessageType: comment

1 0

Change in flashrom[master]: ichspi: Add support for Ice Lake
by Edward O'Callaghan (Code Review) 19 Apr '22

19 Apr '22

Attention is currently required from: Nico Huber, Subrata Banik, Angel Pons, Anastasia Klimchuk. Edward O'Callaghan has posted comments on this change. ( https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/63584 ) Change subject: ichspi: Add support for Ice Lake ...................................................................... Patch Set 1: (3 comments) Commit Message: https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/63584/comment/8b531d74_23c13e66 PS1, Line 7: ichspi: Add support for Ice Lake > As discussed during review of the first of these patches, adding all […] Not sure what you mean by "undone" as those add legitimate new chipset support, seems like hyperbole. I believe you mean to say there should be some refactors happening to help consolidate so many enum branches. As you pointed out Nico, you tried a number of times in the past and didn't manage to trivially do it. In any case, I actually did upload a start towards making progress in that direction in CB:63321 but it has been sitting unreviewed for a few weeks at the moment. I believe the theme of that patch can be applied to a few other places towards a direction of having most of the chipset static details in a lookup table and a switch. More careful review of SPI Programmer Guides between generations is required to find better common patterns. File chipset_enable.c: https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/63584/comment/c687b8e2_19acc666 PS1, Line 998: if (strcmp(name, "Ice Lake") == 0) : return enable_flash_pch100_or_c620(dev, name, 0x1f, 5, CHIPSET_400_SERIES_ICE_POINT); : else : return enable_flash_pch100_or_c620(dev, name, 0x1f, 5, CHIPSET_400_SERIES_COMET_POINT); This feels wrong to have a strcmp(). I do not have a copy of IceLake/IcePoint SPI Programming Guide to figure out if there is any difference, if you have a copy Subrata can we look together and figure out a strategy? If this patch is right to say there is no difference then can we rename `CHIPSET_400_SERIES_COMET_POINT` to `CHIPSET_400_SERIES_COMET_ICE_POINT` Maybe? https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/63584/comment/68caca04_44159b7d PS1, Line 2149: 0x34a4 > But can it be hidden? Maybe not everybody have updated their code […] Subrata, flashrom can be used in "odd" situations when folks are porting coreboot to boards in the community. I think this is what Nico is alluding to here as to make flashrom as robust as possible to allow for flashing. Should DID's in the table used for detection of hidden situations perhaps have " (hidden)" suffix and a more detailed code comment explaining so we can avoid confusion? Feel like this is it's own patch. -- To view, visit https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/63584 To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit https://review.coreboot.org/settings Gerrit-Project: flashrom Gerrit-Branch: master Gerrit-Change-Id: If000b152c6e454617a7ad0245d16f8b1dea97fa0 Gerrit-Change-Number: 63584 Gerrit-PatchSet: 1 Gerrit-Owner: Subrata Banik <subratabanik(a)google.com> Gerrit-Reviewer: Anastasia Klimchuk <aklm(a)chromium.org> Gerrit-Reviewer: Angel Pons <th3fanbus(a)gmail.com> Gerrit-Reviewer: Edward O'Callaghan <quasisec(a)chromium.org> Gerrit-Reviewer: Nico Huber <nico.h(a)gmx.de> Gerrit-Reviewer: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply(a)coreboot.org> Gerrit-Attention: Nico Huber <nico.h(a)gmx.de> Gerrit-Attention: Subrata Banik <subratabanik(a)google.com> Gerrit-Attention: Angel Pons <th3fanbus(a)gmail.com> Gerrit-Attention: Anastasia Klimchuk <aklm(a)chromium.org> Gerrit-Comment-Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2022 01:26:48 +0000 Gerrit-HasComments: Yes Gerrit-Has-Labels: No Comment-In-Reply-To: Nico Huber <nico.h(a)gmx.de> Comment-In-Reply-To: Subrata Banik <subratabanik(a)google.com> Gerrit-MessageType: comment

1 0

Change in flashrom[master]: tests/linux_mtd: Allow for checking open() calls
by Edward O'Callaghan (Code Review) 19 Apr '22

19 Apr '22

Edward O'Callaghan has abandoned this change. ( https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/62318 ) Change subject: tests/linux_mtd: Allow for checking open() calls ...................................................................... Abandoned -- To view, visit https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/62318 To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit https://review.coreboot.org/settings Gerrit-Project: flashrom Gerrit-Branch: master Gerrit-Change-Id: I06e54c0bdc4f5320904e2ab6542345721f1ca370 Gerrit-Change-Number: 62318 Gerrit-PatchSet: 4 Gerrit-Owner: Edward O'Callaghan <quasisec(a)chromium.org> Gerrit-Reviewer: Anastasia Klimchuk <aklm(a)chromium.org> Gerrit-Reviewer: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply(a)coreboot.org> Gerrit-CC: Daniel Campello <campello(a)chromium.org> Gerrit-CC: Paul Menzel <paulepanter(a)mailbox.org> Gerrit-MessageType: abandon

1 0

Change in flashrom[master]: tests/realtek_mst: Allow test to check multiple paths
by Edward O'Callaghan (Code Review) 19 Apr '22

19 Apr '22

Edward O'Callaghan has abandoned this change. ( https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/62311 ) Change subject: tests/realtek_mst: Allow test to check multiple paths ...................................................................... Abandoned -- To view, visit https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/62311 To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit https://review.coreboot.org/settings Gerrit-Project: flashrom Gerrit-Branch: master Gerrit-Change-Id: I80d5e1fc26ad9caf49a98a7671d069bbd8428045 Gerrit-Change-Number: 62311 Gerrit-PatchSet: 8 Gerrit-Owner: Edward O'Callaghan <quasisec(a)chromium.org> Gerrit-Reviewer: Anastasia Klimchuk <aklm(a)chromium.org> Gerrit-Reviewer: Daniel Campello <campello(a)chromium.org> Gerrit-Reviewer: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply(a)coreboot.org> Gerrit-CC: Paul Menzel <paulepanter(a)mailbox.org> Gerrit-MessageType: abandon

1 0

Change in flashrom[master]: flashrom.c: Implement file-based locking semantics
by Daniel Campello (Code Review) 19 Apr '22

19 Apr '22

Attention is currently required from: Hung-Te Lin, Nico Huber, Subrata Banik, Edward O'Callaghan. Daniel Campello has posted comments on this change. ( https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/62213 ) Change subject: flashrom.c: Implement file-based locking semantics ...................................................................... Patch Set 25: Code-Review+1 -- To view, visit https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/62213 To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit https://review.coreboot.org/settings Gerrit-Project: flashrom Gerrit-Branch: master Gerrit-Change-Id: I19cb4e3bf14caeb67c3e8100a20395b264c5113a Gerrit-Change-Number: 62213 Gerrit-PatchSet: 25 Gerrit-Owner: Edward O'Callaghan <quasisec(a)chromium.org> Gerrit-Reviewer: Daniel Campello <campello(a)chromium.org> Gerrit-Reviewer: Hung-Te Lin <hungte(a)chromium.org> Gerrit-Reviewer: Nico Huber <nico.h(a)gmx.de> Gerrit-Reviewer: Subrata Banik <subratabanik(a)google.com> Gerrit-Reviewer: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply(a)coreboot.org> Gerrit-CC: Anastasia Klimchuk <aklm(a)chromium.org> Gerrit-CC: Paul Menzel <paulepanter(a)mailbox.org> Gerrit-CC: Thomas Heijligen <src(a)posteo.de> Gerrit-Attention: Hung-Te Lin <hungte(a)chromium.org> Gerrit-Attention: Nico Huber <nico.h(a)gmx.de> Gerrit-Attention: Subrata Banik <subratabanik(a)google.com> Gerrit-Attention: Edward O'Callaghan <quasisec(a)chromium.org> Gerrit-Comment-Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2022 00:37:54 +0000 Gerrit-HasComments: No Gerrit-Has-Labels: Yes Gerrit-MessageType: comment

1 0

Change in flashrom[master]: tests/: Add file path and flags validation to open() calls
by Edward O'Callaghan (Code Review) 18 Apr '22

18 Apr '22

Edward O'Callaghan has submitted this change. ( https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/62320 ) Change subject: tests/: Add file path and flags validation to open() calls ...................................................................... tests/: Add file path and flags validation to open() calls With this change we add path and flag validation to many tests that do not call open. Expected path is set to NULL, if the code indead calls open then the assertion for non-NULL will make the test fail. BUG=b:217629892,b:215255210 TEST=`ninja test`. Change-Id: I892fa1ecee26ebce9640893edbb228fa9aa7b0b6 Signed-off-by: Edward O'Callaghan <quasisec(a)google.com> Co-Author: Daniel Campello <campello(a)chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Daniel Campello <campello(a)chromium.org> Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/62320 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply(a)coreboot.org> Reviewed-by: Anastasia Klimchuk <aklm(a)chromium.org> --- M tests/chip.c M tests/lifecycle.c 2 files changed, 113 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-) Approvals: build bot (Jenkins): Verified Anastasia Klimchuk: Looks good to me, approved diff --git a/tests/chip.c b/tests/chip.c index fe12533..03d604f 100644 --- a/tests/chip.c +++ b/tests/chip.c @@ -102,8 +102,10 @@ } static void setup_chip(struct flashrom_flashctx *flashctx, struct flashrom_layout **layout, - struct flashchip *chip, const char *programmer_param) + struct flashchip *chip, const char *programmer_param, const struct io_mock *io) { + io_mock_register(io); + flashctx->chip = chip; g_chip_state.unlock_calls = 0; @@ -139,6 +141,8 @@ printf("Releasing layout... "); flashrom_layout_release(*layout); printf("done\n"); + + io_mock_register(NULL); } static const struct flashchip chip_8MiB = { @@ -190,12 +194,20 @@ { (void) state; /* unused */ + static struct io_mock_fallback_open_state data = { + .noc = 0, + .paths = { NULL }, + }; + const struct io_mock chip_io = { + .fallback_open_state = &data, + }; + struct flashrom_flashctx flashctx = { 0 }; struct flashrom_layout *layout; struct flashchip mock_chip = chip_8MiB; const char *param = ""; /* Default values for all params. */ - setup_chip(&flashctx, &layout, &mock_chip, param); + setup_chip(&flashctx, &layout, &mock_chip, param, &chip_io); printf("Erase chip operation started.\n"); assert_int_equal(0, flashrom_flash_erase(&flashctx)); @@ -208,6 +220,14 @@ { (void) state; /* unused */ + static struct io_mock_fallback_open_state data = { + .noc = 0, + .paths = { NULL }, + }; + const struct io_mock chip_io = { + .fallback_open_state = &data, + }; + struct flashrom_flashctx flashctx = { 0 }; struct flashrom_layout *layout; struct flashchip mock_chip = chip_W25Q128_V; @@ -217,7 +237,7 @@ */ char *param_dup = strdup("bus=spi,emulate=W25Q128FV"); - setup_chip(&flashctx, &layout, &mock_chip, param_dup); + setup_chip(&flashctx, &layout, &mock_chip, param_dup, &chip_io); printf("Erase chip operation started.\n"); assert_int_equal(0, flashrom_flash_erase(&flashctx)); @@ -232,12 +252,20 @@ { (void) state; /* unused */ + static struct io_mock_fallback_open_state data = { + .noc = 0, + .paths = { NULL }, + }; + const struct io_mock chip_io = { + .fallback_open_state = &data, + }; + struct flashrom_flashctx flashctx = { 0 }; struct flashrom_layout *layout; struct flashchip mock_chip = chip_8MiB; const char *param = ""; /* Default values for all params. */ - setup_chip(&flashctx, &layout, &mock_chip, param); + setup_chip(&flashctx, &layout, &mock_chip, param, &chip_io); const char *const filename = "read_chip.test"; unsigned long size = mock_chip.total_size * 1024; @@ -257,6 +285,14 @@ { (void) state; /* unused */ + static struct io_mock_fallback_open_state data = { + .noc = 0, + .paths = { NULL }, + }; + const struct io_mock chip_io = { + .fallback_open_state = &data, + }; + struct flashrom_flashctx flashctx = { 0 }; struct flashrom_layout *layout; struct flashchip mock_chip = chip_W25Q128_V; @@ -266,7 +302,7 @@ */ char *param_dup = strdup("bus=spi,emulate=W25Q128FV"); - setup_chip(&flashctx, &layout, &mock_chip, param_dup); + setup_chip(&flashctx, &layout, &mock_chip, param_dup, &chip_io); const char *const filename = "read_chip.test"; unsigned long size = mock_chip.total_size * 1024; @@ -287,12 +323,20 @@ { (void) state; /* unused */ + static struct io_mock_fallback_open_state data = { + .noc = 0, + .paths = { NULL }, + }; + const struct io_mock chip_io = { + .fallback_open_state = &data, + }; + struct flashrom_flashctx flashctx = { 0 }; struct flashrom_layout *layout; struct flashchip mock_chip = chip_8MiB; const char *param = ""; /* Default values for all params. */ - setup_chip(&flashctx, &layout, &mock_chip, param); + setup_chip(&flashctx, &layout, &mock_chip, param, &chip_io); /* * Providing filename "-" means content is taken from standard input. @@ -325,6 +369,14 @@ { (void) state; /* unused */ + static struct io_mock_fallback_open_state data = { + .noc = 0, + .paths = { NULL }, + }; + const struct io_mock chip_io = { + .fallback_open_state = &data, + }; + struct flashrom_flashctx flashctx = { 0 }; struct flashrom_layout *layout; struct flashchip mock_chip = chip_W25Q128_V; @@ -334,7 +386,7 @@ */ char *param_dup = strdup("bus=spi,emulate=W25Q128FV"); - setup_chip(&flashctx, &layout, &mock_chip, param_dup); + setup_chip(&flashctx, &layout, &mock_chip, param_dup, &chip_io); /* See comment in write_chip_test_success */ const char *const filename = "-"; @@ -367,18 +419,21 @@ { (void) state; /* unused */ + static struct io_mock_fallback_open_state data = { + .noc = 0, + .paths = { NULL }, + }; const struct io_mock verify_chip_io = { .fread = verify_chip_fread, + .fallback_open_state = &data, }; - io_mock_register(&verify_chip_io); - struct flashrom_flashctx flashctx = { 0 }; struct flashrom_layout *layout; struct flashchip mock_chip = chip_8MiB; const char *param = ""; /* Default values for all params. */ - setup_chip(&flashctx, &layout, &mock_chip, param); + setup_chip(&flashctx, &layout, &mock_chip, param, &verify_chip_io); /* See comment in write_chip_test_success */ const char *const filename = "-"; @@ -393,20 +448,21 @@ teardown(&layout); free(newcontents); - - io_mock_register(NULL); } void verify_chip_with_dummyflasher_test_success(void **state) { (void) state; /* unused */ + static struct io_mock_fallback_open_state data = { + .noc = 0, + .paths = { NULL }, + }; const struct io_mock verify_chip_io = { .fread = verify_chip_fread, + .fallback_open_state = &data, }; - io_mock_register(&verify_chip_io); - struct flashrom_flashctx flashctx = { 0 }; struct flashrom_layout *layout; struct flashchip mock_chip = chip_W25Q128_V; @@ -416,7 +472,7 @@ */ char *param_dup = strdup("bus=spi,emulate=W25Q128FV"); - setup_chip(&flashctx, &layout, &mock_chip, param_dup); + setup_chip(&flashctx, &layout, &mock_chip, param_dup, &verify_chip_io); /* See comment in write_chip_test_success */ const char *const filename = "-"; @@ -443,6 +499,4 @@ free(param_dup); free(newcontents); - - io_mock_register(NULL); } diff --git a/tests/lifecycle.c b/tests/lifecycle.c index 41cf7a8..825654f 100644 --- a/tests/lifecycle.c +++ b/tests/lifecycle.c @@ -83,7 +83,15 @@ void dummy_basic_lifecycle_test_success(void **state) { #if CONFIG_DUMMY == 1 - run_basic_lifecycle(state, NULL, &programmer_dummy, "bus=parallel+lpc+fwh+spi"); + static struct io_mock_fallback_open_state dummy_fallback_open_state = { + .noc = 0, + .paths = { NULL }, + }; + const struct io_mock dummy_io = { + .fallback_open_state = &dummy_fallback_open_state, + }; + + run_basic_lifecycle(state, &dummy_io, &programmer_dummy, "bus=parallel+lpc+fwh+spi"); #else skip(); #endif @@ -92,7 +100,15 @@ void dummy_probe_lifecycle_test_success(void **state) { #if CONFIG_DUMMY == 1 - run_probe_lifecycle(state, NULL, &programmer_dummy, "bus=spi,emulate=W25Q128FV", "W25Q128.V"); + static struct io_mock_fallback_open_state dummy_fallback_open_state = { + .noc = 0, + .paths = { NULL }, + }; + const struct io_mock dummy_io = { + .fallback_open_state = &dummy_fallback_open_state, + }; + + run_probe_lifecycle(state, &dummy_io, &programmer_dummy, "bus=spi,emulate=W25Q128FV", "W25Q128.V"); #else skip(); #endif @@ -101,7 +117,15 @@ void nicrealtek_basic_lifecycle_test_success(void **state) { #if CONFIG_NICREALTEK == 1 - run_basic_lifecycle(state, NULL, &programmer_nicrealtek, ""); + static struct io_mock_fallback_open_state nicrealtek_fallback_open_state = { + .noc = 0, + .paths = { NULL }, + }; + const struct io_mock nicrealtek_io = { + .fallback_open_state = &nicrealtek_fallback_open_state, + }; + + run_basic_lifecycle(state, &nicrealtek_io, &programmer_nicrealtek, ""); #else skip(); #endif @@ -178,12 +202,17 @@ void raiden_debug_basic_lifecycle_test_success(void **state) { #if CONFIG_RAIDEN_DEBUG_SPI == 1 + static struct io_mock_fallback_open_state raiden_debug_fallback_open_state = { + .noc = 0, + .paths = { NULL }, + }; const struct io_mock raiden_debug_io = { .libusb_get_device_list = raiden_debug_libusb_get_device_list, .libusb_free_device_list = raiden_debug_libusb_free_device_list, .libusb_get_device_descriptor = raiden_debug_libusb_get_device_descriptor, .libusb_get_config_descriptor = raiden_debug_libusb_get_config_descriptor, .libusb_free_config_descriptor = raiden_debug_libusb_free_config_descriptor, + .fallback_open_state = &raiden_debug_fallback_open_state, }; /* @@ -225,9 +254,14 @@ void dediprog_basic_lifecycle_test_success(void **state) { #if CONFIG_DEDIPROG == 1 + static struct io_mock_fallback_open_state dediprog_fallback_open_state = { + .noc = 0, + .paths = { NULL }, + }; const struct io_mock dediprog_io = { .libusb_init = dediprog_libusb_init, .libusb_control_transfer = dediprog_libusb_control_transfer, + .fallback_open_state = &dediprog_fallback_open_state, }; run_basic_lifecycle(state, &dediprog_io, &programmer_dediprog, "voltage=3.5V"); @@ -296,11 +330,16 @@ { #if CONFIG_LINUX_MTD == 1 struct linux_mtd_io_state linux_mtd_io_state = { NULL }; + static struct io_mock_fallback_open_state linux_mtd_fallback_open_state = { + .noc = 0, + .paths = { NULL }, + }; const struct io_mock linux_mtd_io = { .state = &linux_mtd_io_state, .fopen = linux_mtd_fopen, .fread = linux_mtd_fread, .fclose = linux_mtd_fclose, + .fallback_open_state = &linux_mtd_fallback_open_state, }; run_probe_lifecycle(state, &linux_mtd_io, &programmer_linux_mtd, "", "Opaque flash chip"); -- To view, visit https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/62320 To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit https://review.coreboot.org/settings Gerrit-Project: flashrom Gerrit-Branch: master Gerrit-Change-Id: I892fa1ecee26ebce9640893edbb228fa9aa7b0b6 Gerrit-Change-Number: 62320 Gerrit-PatchSet: 17 Gerrit-Owner: Edward O'Callaghan <quasisec(a)chromium.org> Gerrit-Reviewer: Anastasia Klimchuk <aklm(a)chromium.org> Gerrit-Reviewer: Daniel Campello <campello(a)chromium.org> Gerrit-Reviewer: Edward O'Callaghan <quasisec(a)chromium.org> Gerrit-Reviewer: Sam McNally <sammc(a)google.com> Gerrit-Reviewer: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply(a)coreboot.org> Gerrit-CC: Paul Menzel <paulepanter(a)mailbox.org> Gerrit-MessageType: merged

1 0

Change in flashrom[master]: ich_descriptor.c: Simplify get_density lookups by deduplicate sw
by Edward O'Callaghan (Code Review) 18 Apr '22

18 Apr '22

Attention is currently required from: Nico Huber. Hello build bot (Jenkins), Nico Huber, I'd like you to reexamine a change. Please visit https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/63321 to look at the new patch set (#2). Change subject: ich_descriptor.c: Simplify get_density lookups by deduplicate sw ...................................................................... ich_descriptor.c: Simplify get_density lookups by deduplicate sw These two switch statements look up the same thing with only the return type as different. Therefore deduce out the density encoding lookup from the use-case logic. TEST=`flashrom -p internal --flash-name` on Intel Kaby Lake U w/ iHDCP2.2 Prem. Change-Id: Ieb4e9f19f4f06becd344fe08829dabe20c3c8de0 Signed-off-by: Edward O'Callaghan <quasisec(a)google.com> --- M ich_descriptors.c 1 file changed, 50 insertions(+), 80 deletions(-) git pull ssh://review.coreboot.org:29418/flashrom refs/changes/21/63321/2 -- To view, visit https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/63321 To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit https://review.coreboot.org/settings Gerrit-Project: flashrom Gerrit-Branch: master Gerrit-Change-Id: Ieb4e9f19f4f06becd344fe08829dabe20c3c8de0 Gerrit-Change-Number: 63321 Gerrit-PatchSet: 2 Gerrit-Owner: Edward O'Callaghan <quasisec(a)chromium.org> Gerrit-Reviewer: Nico Huber <nico.h(a)gmx.de> Gerrit-Reviewer: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply(a)coreboot.org> Gerrit-Attention: Nico Huber <nico.h(a)gmx.de> Gerrit-MessageType: newpatchset

1 0

Change in flashrom[master]: flashrom.8.tmpl: Add raiden_debug_spi doc entry
by Edward O'Callaghan (Code Review) 18 Apr '22

18 Apr '22

Attention is currently required from: Felix Singer, Nico Huber, Martin L Roth, Angel Pons, Nikolai Artemiev. Edward O'Callaghan has posted comments on this change. ( https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/62768 ) Change subject: flashrom.8.tmpl: Add raiden_debug_spi doc entry ...................................................................... Patch Set 5: (1 comment) File flashrom.8.tmpl: https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/62768/comment/37195401_6fc8328e PS3, Line 1166: false > I agree, it is "buggy" in that it is inconsistent […] Done -- To view, visit https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/62768 To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit https://review.coreboot.org/settings Gerrit-Project: flashrom Gerrit-Branch: master Gerrit-Change-Id: I186920006bdfcc7a9f89542f84b452dfc72b18e4 Gerrit-Change-Number: 62768 Gerrit-PatchSet: 5 Gerrit-Owner: Edward O'Callaghan <quasisec(a)chromium.org> Gerrit-Reviewer: Anastasia Klimchuk <aklm(a)chromium.org> Gerrit-Reviewer: Angel Pons <th3fanbus(a)gmail.com> Gerrit-Reviewer: Martin L Roth <martinroth(a)google.com> Gerrit-Reviewer: Nikolai Artemiev <nartemiev(a)google.com> Gerrit-Reviewer: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply(a)coreboot.org> Gerrit-CC: Felix Singer <felixsinger(a)posteo.net> Gerrit-CC: Nico Huber <nico.h(a)gmx.de> Gerrit-CC: Paul Menzel <paulepanter(a)mailbox.org> Gerrit-Attention: Felix Singer <felixsinger(a)posteo.net> Gerrit-Attention: Nico Huber <nico.h(a)gmx.de> Gerrit-Attention: Martin L Roth <martinroth(a)google.com> Gerrit-Attention: Angel Pons <th3fanbus(a)gmail.com> Gerrit-Attention: Nikolai Artemiev <nartemiev(a)google.com> Gerrit-Comment-Date: Mon, 18 Apr 2022 09:33:03 +0000 Gerrit-HasComments: Yes Gerrit-Has-Labels: No Comment-In-Reply-To: Nico Huber <nico.h(a)gmx.de> Comment-In-Reply-To: Edward O'Callaghan <quasisec(a)chromium.org> Gerrit-MessageType: comment

1 0

Change in flashrom[master]: Introduce an `include` directory for header files
by Felix Singer (Code Review) 17 Apr '22

17 Apr '22

Attention is currently required from: Nico Huber, Thomas Heijligen, Edward O'Callaghan, Anastasia Klimchuk. Felix Singer has posted comments on this change. ( https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/58622 ) Change subject: Introduce an `include` directory for header files ...................................................................... Patch Set 3: Code-Review+1 -- To view, visit https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/58622 To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit https://review.coreboot.org/settings Gerrit-Project: flashrom Gerrit-Branch: master Gerrit-Change-Id: Iaddd6bbfa0624b166d422f665877f096983bf4cf Gerrit-Change-Number: 58622 Gerrit-PatchSet: 3 Gerrit-Owner: Felix Singer <felixsinger(a)posteo.net> Gerrit-Reviewer: Anastasia Klimchuk <aklm(a)chromium.org> Gerrit-Reviewer: Angel Pons <th3fanbus(a)gmail.com> Gerrit-Reviewer: Edward O'Callaghan <quasisec(a)chromium.org> Gerrit-Reviewer: Felix Singer <felixsinger(a)posteo.net> Gerrit-Reviewer: Nico Huber <nico.h(a)gmx.de> Gerrit-Reviewer: Thomas Heijligen <src(a)posteo.de> Gerrit-Reviewer: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply(a)coreboot.org> Gerrit-CC: Peter Marheine <pmarheine(a)chromium.org> Gerrit-Attention: Nico Huber <nico.h(a)gmx.de> Gerrit-Attention: Thomas Heijligen <src(a)posteo.de> Gerrit-Attention: Edward O'Callaghan <quasisec(a)chromium.org> Gerrit-Attention: Anastasia Klimchuk <aklm(a)chromium.org> Gerrit-Comment-Date: Sun, 17 Apr 2022 16:45:55 +0000 Gerrit-HasComments: No Gerrit-Has-Labels: Yes Gerrit-MessageType: comment

1 0

Change in flashrom[master]: Introduce an `include` directory for header files
by Thomas Heijligen (Code Review) 17 Apr '22

17 Apr '22

Attention is currently required from: Felix Singer, Nico Huber, Edward O'Callaghan, Angel Pons, Anastasia Klimchuk. Thomas Heijligen has posted comments on this change. ( https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/58622 ) Change subject: Introduce an `include` directory for header files ...................................................................... Patch Set 3: (2 comments) Commit Message: https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/58622/comment/c596e6f2_7a66d0bc PS2, Line 9: src/include > +1 Done File meson.build: https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/58622/comment/aa864a4a_12fa810e PS2, Line 413: include_directories : include_directories('src/include'), > IIRC, you can avoid repeating the patch by using a variable, e.g. one on top: […] Done -- To view, visit https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/58622 To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit https://review.coreboot.org/settings Gerrit-Project: flashrom Gerrit-Branch: master Gerrit-Change-Id: Iaddd6bbfa0624b166d422f665877f096983bf4cf Gerrit-Change-Number: 58622 Gerrit-PatchSet: 3 Gerrit-Owner: Felix Singer <felixsinger(a)posteo.net> Gerrit-Reviewer: Anastasia Klimchuk <aklm(a)chromium.org> Gerrit-Reviewer: Angel Pons <th3fanbus(a)gmail.com> Gerrit-Reviewer: Edward O'Callaghan <quasisec(a)chromium.org> Gerrit-Reviewer: Nico Huber <nico.h(a)gmx.de> Gerrit-Reviewer: Thomas Heijligen <src(a)posteo.de> Gerrit-Reviewer: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply(a)coreboot.org> Gerrit-CC: Peter Marheine <pmarheine(a)chromium.org> Gerrit-Attention: Felix Singer <felixsinger(a)posteo.net> Gerrit-Attention: Nico Huber <nico.h(a)gmx.de> Gerrit-Attention: Edward O'Callaghan <quasisec(a)chromium.org> Gerrit-Attention: Angel Pons <th3fanbus(a)gmail.com> Gerrit-Attention: Anastasia Klimchuk <aklm(a)chromium.org> Gerrit-Comment-Date: Sun, 17 Apr 2022 14:10:32 +0000 Gerrit-HasComments: Yes Gerrit-Has-Labels: No Comment-In-Reply-To: Nico Huber <nico.h(a)gmx.de> Comment-In-Reply-To: Angel Pons <th3fanbus(a)gmail.com> Gerrit-MessageType: comment

1 0

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

flashrom-gerrit April 2022