December 2022 - flashrom-gerrit

[M] Change in flashrom[master]: cli_classic.c: Allow ctrl of behaviour with WO and RO regions
by Edward O'Callaghan (Code Review) 23 Dec '22

23 Dec '22

Attention is currently required from: Edward O'Callaghan, Nikolai Artemiev. Hello Felix Singer, build bot (Jenkins), Angel Pons, Nikolai Artemiev, I'd like you to reexamine a change. Please visit https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/70895 to look at the new patch set (#6). Change subject: cli_classic.c: Allow ctrl of behaviour with WO and RO regions ...................................................................... cli_classic.c: Allow ctrl of behaviour with WO and RO regions Add two force flags to the flashrom CLI frontend, --force-skip-nonreadable - skip reading non-readbale regions without failure, --force-skip-nonwritable - skip writing non-writable regions without failure. Each flag allows the user to finely control the behaviour of flashrom read and write operations when flashrom encounters a known permission problem. This can be useful in cases such as wanting to write a pre-padded BIOS image across flash where locked regions just wish to be left untouched without the need to craft a custom layout file for each case. Alternatively, to read a copy of flash complete with padding for regions that are known not to be readable at runtime however the user does not know the layout of flash or just wishes to have a padded binary read back. Change-Id: Iff753b748765410ea38b845613c361db7ad16a61 Signed-off-by: Edward O'Callaghan <quasisec(a)google.com> --- M cli_classic.c M flashrom.8.tmpl 2 files changed, 53 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) git pull ssh://review.coreboot.org:29418/flashrom refs/changes/95/70895/6 -- To view, visit https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/70895 To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit https://review.coreboot.org/settings Gerrit-Project: flashrom Gerrit-Branch: master Gerrit-Change-Id: Iff753b748765410ea38b845613c361db7ad16a61 Gerrit-Change-Number: 70895 Gerrit-PatchSet: 6 Gerrit-Owner: Edward O'Callaghan <quasisec(a)chromium.org> Gerrit-Reviewer: Angel Pons <th3fanbus(a)gmail.com> Gerrit-Reviewer: Felix Singer <felixsinger(a)posteo.net> Gerrit-Reviewer: Nikolai Artemiev <nartemiev(a)google.com> Gerrit-Reviewer: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply(a)coreboot.org> Gerrit-Attention: Edward O'Callaghan <quasisec(a)chromium.org> Gerrit-Attention: Nikolai Artemiev <nartemiev(a)google.com> Gerrit-MessageType: newpatchset

1 0

[M] Change in flashrom[master]: flashrom: Check for flash access restrictions in erase path
by Edward O'Callaghan (Code Review) 23 Dec '22

23 Dec '22

Edward O'Callaghan has submitted this change. ( https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/70517 ) Change subject: flashrom: Check for flash access restrictions in erase path ...................................................................... flashrom: Check for flash access restrictions in erase path Skip unwritable regions if FLASHROM_FLAG_SKIP_UNWRITABLE_REGIONS is true. If the flag is false, erase operations that include an unwritable region will not erase anything and return an error. BUG=b:260440773 BRANCH=none TEST=flashrom -E on dedede (JSL) Change-Id: If027a96a024782c7707c6d38680709a1a117f3ef CoAuthored-by: Edward O'Callaghan <quasisec(a)google.com> Signed-off-by: Edward O'Callaghan <quasisec(a)google.com> Signed-off-by: Nikolai Artemiev <nartemiev(a)google.com> Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/70517 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply(a)coreboot.org> Reviewed-by: Edward O'Callaghan <quasisec(a)chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Felix Singer <felixsinger(a)posteo.net> --- M flashrom.c 1 file changed, 55 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) Approvals: build bot (Jenkins): Verified Felix Singer: Looks good to me, approved Edward O'Callaghan: Looks good to me, but someone else must approve diff --git a/flashrom.c b/flashrom.c index b611beb..62f38f8 100644 --- a/flashrom.c +++ b/flashrom.c @@ -1460,13 +1460,39 @@ all_skipped = false; msg_cdbg("E"); - if (erasefn(flashctx, info->erase_start, erase_len)) - goto _free_ret; - if (check_erased_range(flashctx, info->erase_start, erase_len)) { - msg_cerr("ERASE FAILED!\n"); - goto _free_ret; + + if (!flashctx->flags.skip_unwritable_regions) { + if (check_for_unwritable_regions(flashctx, info->erase_start, erase_len)) + goto _free_ret; } + unsigned int len; + for (unsigned int addr = info->erase_start; addr < info->erase_start + erase_len; addr += len) { + struct flash_region region; + get_flash_region(flashctx, addr, &region); + + len = min(info->erase_start + erase_len, region.end) - addr; + + if (region.write_prot) { + msg_gdbg("%s: cannot erase inside %s region (%#08x..%#08x), skipping range (%#08x..%#08x).\n", + __func__, region.name, region.start, region.end - 1, addr, addr + len - 1); + free(region.name); + continue; + } + + msg_gdbg("%s: %s region (%#08x..%#08x) is writable, erasing range (%#08x..%#08x).\n", + __func__, region.name, region.start, region.end - 1, addr, addr + len - 1); + free(region.name); + + if (erasefn(flashctx, addr, len)) + goto _free_ret; + if (check_erased_range(flashctx, addr, len)) { + msg_cerr("ERASE FAILED!\n"); + goto _free_ret; + } + } + + if (region_unaligned) { unsigned int starthere = 0, lenhere = 0, writecount = 0; /* get_next_write() sets starthere to a new value after the call. */ -- To view, visit https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/70517 To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit https://review.coreboot.org/settings Gerrit-Project: flashrom Gerrit-Branch: master Gerrit-Change-Id: If027a96a024782c7707c6d38680709a1a117f3ef Gerrit-Change-Number: 70517 Gerrit-PatchSet: 11 Gerrit-Owner: Nikolai Artemiev <nartemiev(a)google.com> Gerrit-Reviewer: Aarya <aarya.chaumal(a)gmail.com> Gerrit-Reviewer: Angel Pons <th3fanbus(a)gmail.com> Gerrit-Reviewer: Edward O'Callaghan <quasisec(a)chromium.org> Gerrit-Reviewer: Felix Singer <felixsinger(a)posteo.net> Gerrit-Reviewer: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply(a)coreboot.org> Gerrit-MessageType: merged

1 0

[M] Change in flashrom[master]: flashrom.c: Add new erase_by_layout and walk_bylayout implementations
by Aarya (Code Review) 23 Dec '22

23 Dec '22

Attention is currently required from: Simon Buhrow, Thomas Heijligen, Edward O'Callaghan. Aarya has posted comments on this change. ( https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/71173 ) Change subject: flashrom.c: Add new erase_by_layout and walk_bylayout implementations ...................................................................... Patch Set 7: (10 comments) File flashrom.c: https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/71173/comment/6d8cb69b_fe6db871 PS6, Line 1546: , erasefn_count); > `, count_usable_erasers(flashctx));` Done https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/71173/comment/b4f7fc54_3f03ff6d PS6, Line 1554: else > you don't need a `else` Done https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/71173/comment/62784027_458d98b6 PS6, Line 1681: int ret = 0; > if you use `ret = 1` as the default you exchange many `ret = 1`'s with one `ret = 0`. Done https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/71173/comment/8cef4076_3b2286e4 PS6, Line 1683: const struct romentry *entry = NULL; > pair with while loop construct. Done https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/71173/comment/9e2273d4_bb338fe5 PS6, Line 1684: struct erase_layout *erase_layout = create_erase_layout(flashctx); > If you can help it, pair with the branch below. […] Done https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/71173/comment/4b37bce1_e237c54d PS6, Line 1685: //no layout > delete Done https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/71173/comment/451f6e2f_dfdc0fd4 PS6, Line 1690: //erase layout creation failed > delete Done https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/71173/comment/10342f71_8b74252f PS6, Line 1701: erase_write( > line-wrap: […] Done https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/71173/comment/6f63b846_1295678c PS6, Line 1703: !!! > one `!` is sufficient or be consistent with the above and have none? Done https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/71173/comment/773e0f5c_6c0f2226 PS6, Line 1718: else > ditto Done -- To view, visit https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/71173 To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit https://review.coreboot.org/settings Gerrit-Project: flashrom Gerrit-Branch: master Gerrit-Change-Id: Id79ae943eb9d6a817da28381db477725834faaf6 Gerrit-Change-Number: 71173 Gerrit-PatchSet: 7 Gerrit-Owner: Aarya <aarya.chaumal(a)gmail.com> Gerrit-Reviewer: Edward O'Callaghan <quasisec(a)chromium.org> Gerrit-Reviewer: Simon Buhrow Gerrit-Reviewer: Thomas Heijligen <src(a)posteo.de> Gerrit-Reviewer: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply(a)coreboot.org> Gerrit-Attention: Simon Buhrow Gerrit-Attention: Thomas Heijligen <src(a)posteo.de> Gerrit-Attention: Edward O'Callaghan <quasisec(a)chromium.org> Gerrit-Comment-Date: Fri, 23 Dec 2022 17:01:37 +0000 Gerrit-HasComments: Yes Gerrit-Has-Labels: No Comment-In-Reply-To: Edward O'Callaghan <quasisec(a)chromium.org> Gerrit-MessageType: comment

1 0

[M] Change in flashrom[master]: flashrom.c: Add wrapper function to use the erase algorithm
by Aarya (Code Review) 23 Dec '22

23 Dec '22

Attention is currently required from: Simon Buhrow, Nico Huber, Edward O'Callaghan, Anastasia Klimchuk. Aarya has posted comments on this change. ( https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/66104 ) Change subject: flashrom.c: Add wrapper function to use the erase algorithm ...................................................................... Patch Set 92: (9 comments) File erasure_layout.c: https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/66104/comment/5d1239da_3226feb6 PS91, Line 165: s > `const s` Done https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/66104/comment/69d274b5_cd3f5364 PS91, Line 170: old_start_buf > allocation never checked. Done https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/66104/comment/0c6b856a_48af033c PS91, Line 182: // > add some `\n` to help readability of the function. Done https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/66104/comment/4356146b_96083abd PS91, Line 188: ( > trivial: ` (` Done https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/66104/comment/99016884_ade85873 PS91, Line 189: ( > trivial: ` (` Done https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/66104/comment/392bd159_c6341e53 PS91, Line 194: if(erase_layout[i].layout_list[j].selected) { > consider identifying more base-cases to early return/continue/break to avoid deep loops and branches […] Done https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/66104/comment/50998fbf_0c5cfff2 PS91, Line 195: //execute erase : erasefunc_t *erasefn = lookup_erase_func_ptr(erase_layout[i].eraser); : ret = erasefn(flashctx, start_addr, block_len); : if (ret) { : msg_cerr("Failed to execute erase command for offset %#x to %#x.\n", start_addr, start_addr + block_len); : ret = -1; : goto _end; : } : //adjust curcontents : memset(curcontents+start_addr, erased_value, block_len); : //after erase make it unselected again : erase_layout[i].layout_list[j].selected = false; : msg_cdbg("E(%x:%x)", start_addr, start_addr + block_len - 1); : //verify erase : ret = check_erased_range(flashctx, start_addr, block_len); : if (ret) { : msg_cerr("Verifying flash. Erase failed for range %#x : %#x, Abort.\n", start_addr, start_addr + block_len - 1); : goto _end; : } > integrate CB:70517 ?? File flashrom.c: https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/66104/comment/e8e49652_4f8388c6 PS72, Line 1349: static int erase_by_layout > Yeah sorry for the delay. I'm starting to move the implementation to a separate file now. Done File flashrom.c: https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/66104/comment/1cf011ca_364dd6ae PS78, Line 1422: write_by_layout > in a separate commit before this one, rename as `write_by_layout_legacy()` and, […] Done -- To view, visit https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/66104 To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit https://review.coreboot.org/settings Gerrit-Project: flashrom Gerrit-Branch: master Gerrit-Change-Id: I29e3f2bd796759794184b125741a5abaac6f3ce8 Gerrit-Change-Number: 66104 Gerrit-PatchSet: 92 Gerrit-Owner: Aarya <aarya.chaumal(a)gmail.com> Gerrit-Reviewer: Simon Buhrow Gerrit-Reviewer: Thomas Heijligen <src(a)posteo.de> Gerrit-Reviewer: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply(a)coreboot.org> Gerrit-CC: Anastasia Klimchuk <aklm(a)chromium.org> Gerrit-CC: Edward O'Callaghan <quasisec(a)chromium.org> Gerrit-CC: Nico Huber <nico.h(a)gmx.de> Gerrit-CC: Paul Menzel <paulepanter(a)mailbox.org> Gerrit-Attention: Simon Buhrow Gerrit-Attention: Nico Huber <nico.h(a)gmx.de> Gerrit-Attention: Edward O'Callaghan <quasisec(a)chromium.org> Gerrit-Attention: Anastasia Klimchuk <aklm(a)chromium.org> Gerrit-Comment-Date: Fri, 23 Dec 2022 17:01:35 +0000 Gerrit-HasComments: Yes Gerrit-Has-Labels: No Comment-In-Reply-To: Edward O'Callaghan <quasisec(a)chromium.org> Comment-In-Reply-To: Aarya <aarya.chaumal(a)gmail.com> Gerrit-MessageType: comment

1 0

[S] Change in flashrom[master]: flashrom.c:Add a function to get list of sectors that need erasing
by Aarya (Code Review) 23 Dec '22

23 Dec '22

Attention is currently required from: Simon Buhrow, Edward O'Callaghan. Aarya has posted comments on this change. ( https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/65844 ) Change subject: flashrom.c:Add a function to get list of sectors that need erasing ...................................................................... Patch Set 74: (6 comments) File erasure_layout.c: https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/65844/comment/151a1291_97ff5db6 PS73, Line 127: region_end > `rend` and Doxygen. Done https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/65844/comment/0816ab4d_167f38e7 PS73, Line 127: void * > `void *` in type system speak is mostly like putting on a blind-fold and jumping between a large can […] Done https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/65844/comment/fdee2ac5_28cd8b26 PS73, Line 127: region_start > `rstart` and Doxygen. Done https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/65844/comment/fd0be5ef_5bc380ff PS73, Line 127: function_index > `findex` and in the Doxygen comment you can say "function index". Done https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/65844/comment/a432e29b_bd28e321 PS73, Line 127: struct flashctx *flashctx, > by convention, keep the `flashctx` as the first argument to the function, it helps keep the code-bas […] Done https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/65844/comment/75d3e6c3_55578ac9 PS73, Line 130: function_index == 0 > `!foo` is canonical for the 0 or NULL case. Done -- To view, visit https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/65844 To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit https://review.coreboot.org/settings Gerrit-Project: flashrom Gerrit-Branch: master Gerrit-Change-Id: Ic57ca1cca3d1646543f6b5939ba9c35db8d08256 Gerrit-Change-Number: 65844 Gerrit-PatchSet: 74 Gerrit-Owner: Aarya <aarya.chaumal(a)gmail.com> Gerrit-Reviewer: Edward O'Callaghan <quasisec(a)chromium.org> Gerrit-Reviewer: Simon Buhrow Gerrit-Reviewer: Thomas Heijligen <src(a)posteo.de> Gerrit-Reviewer: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply(a)coreboot.org> Gerrit-CC: Anastasia Klimchuk <aklm(a)chromium.org> Gerrit-CC: Nico Huber <nico.h(a)gmx.de> Gerrit-Attention: Simon Buhrow Gerrit-Attention: Edward O'Callaghan <quasisec(a)chromium.org> Gerrit-Comment-Date: Fri, 23 Dec 2022 17:01:32 +0000 Gerrit-HasComments: Yes Gerrit-Has-Labels: No Comment-In-Reply-To: Edward O'Callaghan <quasisec(a)chromium.org> Gerrit-MessageType: comment

1 0

[M] Change in flashrom[master]: flashrom.c:Add function to get a flattened view of the chip erase blocks
by Aarya (Code Review) 23 Dec '22

23 Dec '22

Attention is currently required from: Simon Buhrow, Nico Huber, Thomas Heijligen, Paul Menzel, Edward O'Callaghan. Aarya has posted comments on this change. ( https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/65879 ) Change subject: flashrom.c:Add function to get a flattened view of the chip erase blocks ...................................................................... Patch Set 55: (11 comments) File erasure_layout.c: https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/65879/comment/f296e9ed_59988bca PS54, Line 24: int > `unsigned int` Done https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/65879/comment/64923c4e_2eddf29b PS54, Line 26: if (layout) { > rewrite your function like this: […] Done https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/65879/comment/7ee44179_11644b3e PS54, Line 34: ) > The signature of this function should be, […] Done https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/65879/comment/73e83c48_5ae2e8ae PS54, Line 48: ; > \n Done https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/65879/comment/1653c5f8_c44e0b67 PS54, Line 54: int j = 0; : while(addr < chip->total_size * 1024) { > ok `j` is shadowed below. Rewrite this while-loop construct as a `for` loop construct as: […] Done https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/65879/comment/4a83b380_8a84abed PS54, Line 64: ) : { > trivial: `) {` and `if (!ptr)` is canonical. Done https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/65879/comment/c7338721_7c338bb5 PS54, Line 71: chipoff_t start_addr = 0; > does this belong to the outer block_count loop? should it be reset when the inner loop finishes for […] Yes it belongs to outer loop and resets every iteration. https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/65879/comment/57cc57f6_de7f650a PS54, Line 72: chipoff_t end_addr = 0; > delete and also don't unnecessarily initialise variables as you obscure compiler warnings. Done https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/65879/comment/65606c19_03c74f8f PS54, Line 74: block_num < block_count > since `block_num` is initialised to zero above doesn't this predicate become `0 < block_count` and t […] No, `block_num` increases. https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/65879/comment/d8ac57a9_360f9b7f PS54, Line 79: e > Keep minimal scope to variables so declare here, […] Done https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/65879/comment/4918a0b3_68be5692 PS54, Line 84: if (layout_idx > 0) { : layout[layout_idx].layout_list[block_num].first_sub_block_index = sub_block_index; : while (layout[layout_idx-1].layout_list[sub_block_index].start_addr >= start_addr && : layout[layout_idx-1].layout_list[sub_block_index].end_addr <= end_addr && : sub_block_index < layout[layout_idx-1].block_count) { : sub_block_index++; : } : layout[layout_idx].layout_list[block_num].last_sub_block_index = sub_block_index - 1; : } > looks like another function with a base case of `layout_idx == 0 => return`. Done -- To view, visit https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/65879 To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit https://review.coreboot.org/settings Gerrit-Project: flashrom Gerrit-Branch: master Gerrit-Change-Id: Iafe78de00daa55f7114bd4ce09465dd88074ece4 Gerrit-Change-Number: 65879 Gerrit-PatchSet: 55 Gerrit-Owner: Aarya <aarya.chaumal(a)gmail.com> Gerrit-Reviewer: Edward O'Callaghan <quasisec(a)chromium.org> Gerrit-Reviewer: Simon Buhrow Gerrit-Reviewer: Thomas Heijligen <src(a)posteo.de> Gerrit-Reviewer: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply(a)coreboot.org> Gerrit-CC: Anastasia Klimchuk <aklm(a)chromium.org> Gerrit-CC: Nico Huber <nico.h(a)gmx.de> Gerrit-CC: Paul Menzel <paulepanter(a)mailbox.org> Gerrit-Attention: Simon Buhrow Gerrit-Attention: Nico Huber <nico.h(a)gmx.de> Gerrit-Attention: Thomas Heijligen <src(a)posteo.de> Gerrit-Attention: Paul Menzel <paulepanter(a)mailbox.org> Gerrit-Attention: Edward O'Callaghan <quasisec(a)chromium.org> Gerrit-Comment-Date: Fri, 23 Dec 2022 17:01:24 +0000 Gerrit-HasComments: Yes Gerrit-Has-Labels: No Comment-In-Reply-To: Edward O'Callaghan <quasisec(a)chromium.org> Gerrit-MessageType: comment

1 0

[M] Change in flashrom[master]: flashrom.c: Add new erase_by_layout and walk_bylayout implementations
by Aarya (Code Review) 23 Dec '22

23 Dec '22

Attention is currently required from: Simon Buhrow, Thomas Heijligen, Aarya. Hello build bot (Jenkins), Simon Buhrow, Thomas Heijligen, Edward O'Callaghan, I'd like you to reexamine a change. Please visit https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/71173 to look at the new patch set (#7). Change subject: flashrom.c: Add new erase_by_layout and walk_bylayout implementations ...................................................................... flashrom.c: Add new erase_by_layout and walk_bylayout implementations Add [erase,walk]_by_layout_new to use optimised implementations of the erase function selection algorithm. Change-Id: Id79ae943eb9d6a817da28381db477725834faaf6 Signed-off-by: Aarya Chaumal <aarya.chaumal(a)gmail.com> --- M flashrom.c 1 file changed, 92 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) git pull ssh://review.coreboot.org:29418/flashrom refs/changes/73/71173/7 -- To view, visit https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/71173 To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit https://review.coreboot.org/settings Gerrit-Project: flashrom Gerrit-Branch: master Gerrit-Change-Id: Id79ae943eb9d6a817da28381db477725834faaf6 Gerrit-Change-Number: 71173 Gerrit-PatchSet: 7 Gerrit-Owner: Aarya <aarya.chaumal(a)gmail.com> Gerrit-Reviewer: Edward O'Callaghan <quasisec(a)chromium.org> Gerrit-Reviewer: Simon Buhrow Gerrit-Reviewer: Thomas Heijligen <src(a)posteo.de> Gerrit-Reviewer: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply(a)coreboot.org> Gerrit-Attention: Simon Buhrow Gerrit-Attention: Thomas Heijligen <src(a)posteo.de> Gerrit-Attention: Aarya <aarya.chaumal(a)gmail.com> Gerrit-MessageType: newpatchset

1 0

[M] Change in flashrom[master]: flashrom.c: Add wrapper function to use the erase algorithm
by Aarya (Code Review) 23 Dec '22

23 Dec '22

Attention is currently required from: Simon Buhrow, Nico Huber, Aarya, Anastasia Klimchuk. Hello build bot (Jenkins), Simon Buhrow, Thomas Heijligen, I'd like you to reexamine a change. Please visit https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/66104 to look at the new patch set (#92). Change subject: flashrom.c: Add wrapper function to use the erase algorithm ...................................................................... flashrom.c: Add wrapper function to use the erase algorithm Add a function to call the erase algorithm. Change-Id: I29e3f2bd796759794184b125741a5abaac6f3ce8 Signed-off-by: Aarya Chaumal <aarya.chaumal(a)gmail.com> --- M erasure_layout.c M erasure_layout.h 2 files changed, 116 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) git pull ssh://review.coreboot.org:29418/flashrom refs/changes/04/66104/92 -- To view, visit https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/66104 To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit https://review.coreboot.org/settings Gerrit-Project: flashrom Gerrit-Branch: master Gerrit-Change-Id: I29e3f2bd796759794184b125741a5abaac6f3ce8 Gerrit-Change-Number: 66104 Gerrit-PatchSet: 92 Gerrit-Owner: Aarya <aarya.chaumal(a)gmail.com> Gerrit-Reviewer: Simon Buhrow Gerrit-Reviewer: Thomas Heijligen <src(a)posteo.de> Gerrit-Reviewer: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply(a)coreboot.org> Gerrit-CC: Anastasia Klimchuk <aklm(a)chromium.org> Gerrit-CC: Edward O'Callaghan <quasisec(a)chromium.org> Gerrit-CC: Nico Huber <nico.h(a)gmx.de> Gerrit-CC: Paul Menzel <paulepanter(a)mailbox.org> Gerrit-Attention: Simon Buhrow Gerrit-Attention: Nico Huber <nico.h(a)gmx.de> Gerrit-Attention: Aarya <aarya.chaumal(a)gmail.com> Gerrit-Attention: Anastasia Klimchuk <aklm(a)chromium.org> Gerrit-MessageType: newpatchset

1 0

[S] Change in flashrom[master]: flashrom.c:Add a function to get list of sectors that need erasing
by Aarya (Code Review) 23 Dec '22

23 Dec '22

Attention is currently required from: Simon Buhrow, Aarya. Hello build bot (Jenkins), Simon Buhrow, Thomas Heijligen, Edward O'Callaghan, I'd like you to reexamine a change. Please visit https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/65844 to look at the new patch set (#74). Change subject: flashrom.c:Add a function to get list of sectors that need erasing ...................................................................... flashrom.c:Add a function to get list of sectors that need erasing Add a function that returns a list of sectors (as seen by the first erase function) that need erasing. Change-Id: Ic57ca1cca3d1646543f6b5939ba9c35db8d08256 Signed-off-by: Aarya Chaumal <aarya.chaumal(a)gmail.com> --- M erasure_layout.c 1 file changed, 48 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) git pull ssh://review.coreboot.org:29418/flashrom refs/changes/44/65844/74 -- To view, visit https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/65844 To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit https://review.coreboot.org/settings Gerrit-Project: flashrom Gerrit-Branch: master Gerrit-Change-Id: Ic57ca1cca3d1646543f6b5939ba9c35db8d08256 Gerrit-Change-Number: 65844 Gerrit-PatchSet: 74 Gerrit-Owner: Aarya <aarya.chaumal(a)gmail.com> Gerrit-Reviewer: Edward O'Callaghan <quasisec(a)chromium.org> Gerrit-Reviewer: Simon Buhrow Gerrit-Reviewer: Thomas Heijligen <src(a)posteo.de> Gerrit-Reviewer: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply(a)coreboot.org> Gerrit-CC: Anastasia Klimchuk <aklm(a)chromium.org> Gerrit-CC: Nico Huber <nico.h(a)gmx.de> Gerrit-Attention: Simon Buhrow Gerrit-Attention: Aarya <aarya.chaumal(a)gmail.com> Gerrit-MessageType: newpatchset

1 0

[M] Change in flashrom[master]: flashrom.c:Add function to get a flattened view of the chip erase blocks
by Aarya (Code Review) 23 Dec '22

23 Dec '22

Attention is currently required from: Simon Buhrow, Nico Huber, Thomas Heijligen, Paul Menzel, Aarya. Hello build bot (Jenkins), Simon Buhrow, Thomas Heijligen, Edward O'Callaghan, I'd like you to reexamine a change. Please visit https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/65879 to look at the new patch set (#55). Change subject: flashrom.c:Add function to get a flattened view of the chip erase blocks ...................................................................... flashrom.c:Add function to get a flattened view of the chip erase blocks Add a function to flatten out the addresses of the flash chip as per the different erase functions. This function will return a list of layouts which is dynamically allocated. So after use all the layouts as well as the list itself should be freed. The free_erase_layout function does that. Change-Id: Iafe78de00daa55f7114bd4ce09465dd88074ece4 Signed-off-by: Aarya Chaumal <aarya.chaumal(a)gmail.com> --- A erasure_layout.c A erasure_layout.h 2 files changed, 158 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) git pull ssh://review.coreboot.org:29418/flashrom refs/changes/79/65879/55 -- To view, visit https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/65879 To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit https://review.coreboot.org/settings Gerrit-Project: flashrom Gerrit-Branch: master Gerrit-Change-Id: Iafe78de00daa55f7114bd4ce09465dd88074ece4 Gerrit-Change-Number: 65879 Gerrit-PatchSet: 55 Gerrit-Owner: Aarya <aarya.chaumal(a)gmail.com> Gerrit-Reviewer: Edward O'Callaghan <quasisec(a)chromium.org> Gerrit-Reviewer: Simon Buhrow Gerrit-Reviewer: Thomas Heijligen <src(a)posteo.de> Gerrit-Reviewer: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply(a)coreboot.org> Gerrit-CC: Anastasia Klimchuk <aklm(a)chromium.org> Gerrit-CC: Nico Huber <nico.h(a)gmx.de> Gerrit-CC: Paul Menzel <paulepanter(a)mailbox.org> Gerrit-Attention: Simon Buhrow Gerrit-Attention: Nico Huber <nico.h(a)gmx.de> Gerrit-Attention: Thomas Heijligen <src(a)posteo.de> Gerrit-Attention: Paul Menzel <paulepanter(a)mailbox.org> Gerrit-Attention: Aarya <aarya.chaumal(a)gmail.com> Gerrit-MessageType: newpatchset

1 0

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

flashrom-gerrit December 2022