flashrom

flashrom@flashrom.org

1 participants
9187 discussions

[patch] successfully testing ST M25P128
by Cristian Măgherușan-Stanciu 19 Jun '11

19 Jun '11

Hello, I just got this new chip soldered thanks to Peter Stuge, and here's a test run result. Found chip "ST M25P128" (16384 kB, SPI) at physical address 0xff000000. Erasing and writing flash chip... Done. Verifying flash... VERIFIED. The patch to mark it as verified in the flashrom source code is listed below. This is Signed-off-by: Cristian Măgherușan-Stanciu <cristi.magherusan(a)gmail.com> Index: flashchips.c =================================================================== --- flashchips.c (revision 1345) +++ flashchips.c (working copy) @@ -6705,7 +6705,7 @@ .model_id = ST_M25P128, .total_size = 16384, .page_size = 256, - .tested = TEST_UNTESTED, + .tested = TEST_OK_PREW, .probe = probe_spi_rdid, .probe_timing = TIMING_ZERO, .block_erasers =

2 1

[PATCH] flashchips.c: Typo. s/don't/doesn't/
by Paul Menzel 19 Jun '11

19 Jun '11

Signed-off-by: Paul Menzel <paulepanter(a)users.sourceforge.net> --- flashchips.c | 52 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------------------- 1 files changed, 26 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-) diff --git a/flashchips.c b/flashchips.c index a82c373..70a4ff1 100644 --- a/flashchips.c +++ b/flashchips.c @@ -155,7 +155,7 @@ struct flashchip flashchips[] = { .feature_bits = FEATURE_ADDR_2AA | FEATURE_SHORT_RESET, .tested = TEST_UNTESTED, .probe = probe_jedec, - .probe_timing = TIMING_IGNORED, /* routine don't use probe_timing (am29f040b.c) */ + .probe_timing = TIMING_IGNORED, /* routine doesn't use probe_timing (am29f040b.c) */ .block_erasers = { { @@ -181,7 +181,7 @@ struct flashchip flashchips[] = { .feature_bits = FEATURE_ADDR_2AA | FEATURE_SHORT_RESET, .tested = TEST_UNTESTED, .probe = probe_jedec, - .probe_timing = TIMING_IGNORED, /* routine don't use probe_timing (am29f040b.c) */ + .probe_timing = TIMING_IGNORED, /* routine doesn't use probe_timing (am29f040b.c) */ .block_erasers = { { @@ -233,7 +233,7 @@ struct flashchip flashchips[] = { .feature_bits = FEATURE_ADDR_2AA | FEATURE_SHORT_RESET, .tested = TEST_UNTESTED, .probe = probe_jedec, - .probe_timing = TIMING_IGNORED, /* routine don't use probe_timing (am29f040b.c) */ + .probe_timing = TIMING_IGNORED, /* routine doesn't use probe_timing (am29f040b.c) */ .block_erasers = { { @@ -259,7 +259,7 @@ struct flashchip flashchips[] = { .feature_bits = FEATURE_ADDR_2AA | FEATURE_SHORT_RESET, .tested = TEST_UNTESTED, .probe = probe_jedec, - .probe_timing = TIMING_IGNORED, /* routine don't use probe_timing (am29f040b.c) */ + .probe_timing = TIMING_IGNORED, /* routine doesn't use probe_timing (am29f040b.c) */ .block_erasers = { { @@ -1230,7 +1230,7 @@ struct flashchip flashchips[] = { .feature_bits = FEATURE_ADDR_2AA | FEATURE_SHORT_RESET, .tested = TEST_UNTESTED, .probe = probe_jedec, - .probe_timing = TIMING_IGNORED, /* routine don't use probe_timing (mx29f002.c) */ + .probe_timing = TIMING_IGNORED, /* routine doesn't use probe_timing (mx29f002.c) */ .block_erasers = { { @@ -1261,7 +1261,7 @@ struct flashchip flashchips[] = { .feature_bits = FEATURE_ADDR_2AA | FEATURE_SHORT_RESET, .tested = TEST_OK_PRW, .probe = probe_jedec, - .probe_timing = TIMING_IGNORED, /* routine don't use probe_timing (mx29f002.c) */ + .probe_timing = TIMING_IGNORED, /* routine doesn't use probe_timing (mx29f002.c) */ .block_erasers = { { @@ -1292,7 +1292,7 @@ struct flashchip flashchips[] = { .feature_bits = FEATURE_ADDR_2AA | FEATURE_SHORT_RESET, .tested = TEST_UNTESTED, .probe = probe_jedec, - .probe_timing = TIMING_IGNORED, /* routine don't use probe_timing (am29f040b.c) */ + .probe_timing = TIMING_IGNORED, /* routine doesn't use probe_timing (am29f040b.c) */ .block_erasers = { { @@ -2280,7 +2280,7 @@ struct flashchip flashchips[] = { .feature_bits = FEATURE_ADDR_SHIFTED | FEATURE_EITHER_RESET, .tested = TEST_UNTESTED, .probe = probe_m29f400bt, - .probe_timing = TIMING_IGNORED, /* routine don't use probe_timing (m29f400bt.c) */ + .probe_timing = TIMING_IGNORED, /* routine doesn't use probe_timing (m29f400bt.c) */ .block_erasers = { { @@ -2311,7 +2311,7 @@ struct flashchip flashchips[] = { .feature_bits = FEATURE_ADDR_SHIFTED | FEATURE_EITHER_RESET, .tested = TEST_UNTESTED, .probe = probe_m29f400bt, - .probe_timing = TIMING_IGNORED, /* routine don't use probe_timing (m29f400bt.c) */ + .probe_timing = TIMING_IGNORED, /* routine doesn't use probe_timing (m29f400bt.c) */ .block_erasers = { { @@ -2931,7 +2931,7 @@ struct flashchip flashchips[] = { .feature_bits = FEATURE_ADDR_2AA | FEATURE_SHORT_RESET, .tested = TEST_UNTESTED, .probe = probe_jedec, - .probe_timing = TIMING_IGNORED, /* routine don't use probe_timing (mx29f002.c) */ + .probe_timing = TIMING_IGNORED, /* routine doesn't use probe_timing (mx29f002.c) */ .block_erasers = { { @@ -2963,7 +2963,7 @@ struct flashchip flashchips[] = { .feature_bits = FEATURE_ADDR_2AA | FEATURE_SHORT_RESET, .tested = TEST_UNTESTED, .probe = probe_jedec, - .probe_timing = TIMING_IGNORED, /* routine don't use probe_timing (mx29f002.c) */ + .probe_timing = TIMING_IGNORED, /* routine doesn't use probe_timing (mx29f002.c) */ .block_erasers = { { @@ -2995,7 +2995,7 @@ struct flashchip flashchips[] = { .feature_bits = FEATURE_ADDR_2AA | FEATURE_SHORT_RESET, .tested = TEST_UNTESTED, .probe = probe_jedec, - .probe_timing = TIMING_IGNORED, /* routine don't use probe_timing (mx29f002.c) */ + .probe_timing = TIMING_IGNORED, /* routine doesn't use probe_timing (mx29f002.c) */ .block_erasers = { { @@ -3026,7 +3026,7 @@ struct flashchip flashchips[] = { .feature_bits = FEATURE_ADDR_2AA | FEATURE_SHORT_RESET, .tested = TEST_OK_PRW, .probe = probe_jedec, - .probe_timing = TIMING_IGNORED, /* routine don't use probe_timing (mx29f002.c) */ + .probe_timing = TIMING_IGNORED, /* routine doesn't use probe_timing (mx29f002.c) */ .block_erasers = { { @@ -3057,7 +3057,7 @@ struct flashchip flashchips[] = { .feature_bits = FEATURE_ADDR_2AA | FEATURE_SHORT_RESET, .tested = TEST_UNTESTED, .probe = probe_jedec, - .probe_timing = TIMING_IGNORED, /* routine don't use probe_timing (mx29f002.c) */ + .probe_timing = TIMING_IGNORED, /* routine doesn't use probe_timing (mx29f002.c) */ .block_erasers = { { @@ -3917,7 +3917,7 @@ struct flashchip flashchips[] = { .feature_bits = 0, .tested = TEST_UNTESTED, .probe = probe_82802ab, - .probe_timing = TIMING_IGNORED, /* routine don't use probe_timing (sst28sf040.c) */ + .probe_timing = TIMING_IGNORED, /* routine doesn't use probe_timing (sst28sf040.c) */ .block_erasers = { { @@ -4368,7 +4368,7 @@ struct flashchip flashchips[] = { .feature_bits = FEATURE_REGISTERMAP, .tested = TEST_UNTESTED, .probe = probe_82802ab, - .probe_timing = TIMING_IGNORED, /* routine don't use probe_timing (sst49lfxxxc.c) */ + .probe_timing = TIMING_IGNORED, /* routine doesn't use probe_timing (sst49lfxxxc.c) */ .block_erasers = { { @@ -4431,7 +4431,7 @@ struct flashchip flashchips[] = { .feature_bits = FEATURE_REGISTERMAP, .tested = TEST_UNTESTED, .probe = probe_82802ab, - .probe_timing = TIMING_IGNORED, /* routine don't use probe_timing (sst49lfxxxc.c) */ + .probe_timing = TIMING_IGNORED, /* routine doesn't use probe_timing (sst49lfxxxc.c) */ .block_erasers = { { @@ -4463,7 +4463,7 @@ struct flashchip flashchips[] = { .feature_bits = FEATURE_REGISTERMAP, .tested = TEST_OK_PRW, .probe = probe_82802ab, - .probe_timing = TIMING_IGNORED, /* routine don't use probe_timing (sst49lfxxxc.c) */ + .probe_timing = TIMING_IGNORED, /* routine doesn't use probe_timing (sst49lfxxxc.c) */ .block_erasers = { { @@ -4640,7 +4640,7 @@ struct flashchip flashchips[] = { .feature_bits = FEATURE_REGISTERMAP, .tested = TEST_OK_PRW, .probe = probe_82802ab, - .probe_timing = TIMING_IGNORED, /* routine don't use probe_timing (sst49lfxxxc.c) */ + .probe_timing = TIMING_IGNORED, /* routine doesn't use probe_timing (sst49lfxxxc.c) */ .block_erasers = { { @@ -5040,7 +5040,7 @@ struct flashchip flashchips[] = { .feature_bits = FEATURE_ADDR_2AA | FEATURE_EITHER_RESET, .tested = TEST_UNTESTED, .probe = probe_jedec, - .probe_timing = TIMING_IGNORED, /* routine don't use probe_timing (am29f040b.c) */ + .probe_timing = TIMING_IGNORED, /* routine doesn't use probe_timing (am29f040b.c) */ .block_erasers = { { @@ -5067,7 +5067,7 @@ struct flashchip flashchips[] = { .feature_bits = FEATURE_ADDR_SHIFTED | FEATURE_EITHER_RESET, .tested = TEST_UNTESTED, .probe = probe_m29f400bt, - .probe_timing = TIMING_IGNORED, /* routine don't use probe_timing (m29f400bt.c) */ + .probe_timing = TIMING_IGNORED, /* routine doesn't use probe_timing (m29f400bt.c) */ .block_erasers = { { @@ -5313,7 +5313,7 @@ struct flashchip flashchips[] = { .feature_bits = FEATURE_REGISTERMAP, .tested = TEST_UNTESTED, .probe = probe_82802ab, - .probe_timing = TIMING_IGNORED, /* routine don't use probe_timing (sst49lfxxxc.c) */ + .probe_timing = TIMING_IGNORED, /* routine doesn't use probe_timing (sst49lfxxxc.c) */ .block_erasers = { { @@ -5345,7 +5345,7 @@ struct flashchip flashchips[] = { .feature_bits = FEATURE_REGISTERMAP, .tested = TEST_UNTESTED, .probe = probe_82802ab, - .probe_timing = TIMING_IGNORED, /* routine don't use probe_timing (82802ab.c) */ + .probe_timing = TIMING_IGNORED, /* routine doesn't use probe_timing (82802ab.c) */ .block_erasers = { { @@ -5372,7 +5372,7 @@ struct flashchip flashchips[] = { .feature_bits = FEATURE_REGISTERMAP, .tested = TEST_OK_PR, .probe = probe_82802ab, - .probe_timing = TIMING_IGNORED, /* routine don't use probe_timing (82802ab.c) */ + .probe_timing = TIMING_IGNORED, /* routine doesn't use probe_timing (82802ab.c) */ .block_erasers = { { @@ -5399,7 +5399,7 @@ struct flashchip flashchips[] = { .feature_bits = FEATURE_REGISTERMAP, .tested = TEST_OK_PR, .probe = probe_82802ab, - .probe_timing = TIMING_IGNORED, /* routine don't use probe_timing (82802ab.c) */ + .probe_timing = TIMING_IGNORED, /* routine doesn't use probe_timing (82802ab.c) */ .block_erasers = { { @@ -6010,7 +6010,7 @@ struct flashchip flashchips[] = { .feature_bits = FEATURE_LONG_RESET, .tested = TEST_OK_PRW, .probe = probe_w29ee011, - .probe_timing = TIMING_IGNORED, /* routine don't use probe_timing (w29ee011.c) */ + .probe_timing = TIMING_IGNORED, /* routine doesn't use probe_timing (w29ee011.c) */ .block_erasers = { { -- 1.7.1

3 3

[commit] r1349 - trunk
by repository service 19 Jun '11

19 Jun '11

Author: uwe Date: Sun Jun 19 19:27:57 2011 New Revision: 1349 URL: http://flashrom.org/trac/flashrom/changeset/1349 Log: Currently messages like "Writing flash chip..." that don't end with a newline are buffered until the operation is complete, unless the particular write function generates status output in the meantime. Flushing stdout after each message ensures that the message appears immediately. Signed-off-by: Ed Swierk <eswierk(a)aristanetworks.com> Acked-by: Uwe Hermann <uwe(a)hermann-uwe.de> Modified: trunk/cli_output.c Modified: trunk/cli_output.c ============================================================================== --- trunk/cli_output.c Sun Jun 19 19:23:55 2011 (r1348) +++ trunk/cli_output.c Sun Jun 19 19:27:57 2011 (r1349) @@ -47,5 +47,6 @@ va_start(ap, fmt); ret = vfprintf(output_type, fmt, ap); va_end(ap); + fflush(output_type); return ret; }

1 0

[commit] r1348 - trunk
by repository service 19 Jun '11

19 Jun '11

Author: uwe Date: Sun Jun 19 19:23:55 2011 New Revision: 1348 URL: http://flashrom.org/trac/flashrom/changeset/1348 Log: flashchips.c: Fix typo: s/don't/doesn't/. Signed-off-by: Paul Menzel <paulepanter(a)users.sourceforge.net> Acked-by: Uwe Hermann <uwe(a)hermann-uwe.de> Modified: trunk/flashchips.c Modified: trunk/flashchips.c ============================================================================== --- trunk/flashchips.c Sun Jun 19 19:09:49 2011 (r1347) +++ trunk/flashchips.c Sun Jun 19 19:23:55 2011 (r1348) @@ -3360,7 +3360,7 @@ .feature_bits = FEATURE_ADDR_SHIFTED | FEATURE_EITHER_RESET, .tested = TEST_UNTESTED, .probe = probe_m29f400bt, - .probe_timing = TIMING_IGNORED, /* routine don't use probe_timing (m29f400bt.c) */ + .probe_timing = TIMING_IGNORED, /* routine doesn't use probe_timing (m29f400bt.c) */ .block_erasers = { { @@ -3392,7 +3392,7 @@ .feature_bits = FEATURE_ADDR_SHIFTED | FEATURE_EITHER_RESET, .tested = TEST_UNTESTED, .probe = probe_m29f400bt, - .probe_timing = TIMING_IGNORED, /* routine don't use probe_timing (m29f400bt.c) */ + .probe_timing = TIMING_IGNORED, /* routine doesn't use probe_timing (m29f400bt.c) */ .block_erasers = { { @@ -5622,7 +5622,7 @@ .feature_bits = 0, .tested = TEST_UNTESTED, .probe = probe_82802ab, - .probe_timing = TIMING_IGNORED, /* routine don't use probe_timing (sst28sf040.c) */ + .probe_timing = TIMING_IGNORED, /* routine doesn't use probe_timing (sst28sf040.c) */ .block_erasers = { { @@ -6091,7 +6091,7 @@ .feature_bits = FEATURE_REGISTERMAP, .tested = TEST_UNTESTED, .probe = probe_82802ab, - .probe_timing = TIMING_IGNORED, /* routine don't use probe_timing (sst49lfxxxc.c) */ + .probe_timing = TIMING_IGNORED, /* routine doesn't use probe_timing (sst49lfxxxc.c) */ .block_erasers = { { @@ -6156,7 +6156,7 @@ .feature_bits = FEATURE_REGISTERMAP, .tested = TEST_UNTESTED, .probe = probe_82802ab, - .probe_timing = TIMING_IGNORED, /* routine don't use probe_timing (sst49lfxxxc.c) */ + .probe_timing = TIMING_IGNORED, /* routine doesn't use probe_timing (sst49lfxxxc.c) */ .block_erasers = { { @@ -6189,7 +6189,7 @@ .feature_bits = FEATURE_REGISTERMAP, .tested = TEST_OK_PR, .probe = probe_82802ab, - .probe_timing = TIMING_IGNORED, /* routine don't use probe_timing (sst49lfxxxc.c) */ + .probe_timing = TIMING_IGNORED, /* routine doesn't use probe_timing (sst49lfxxxc.c) */ .block_erasers = { { @@ -6373,7 +6373,7 @@ .feature_bits = FEATURE_REGISTERMAP, .tested = TEST_OK_PRE, .probe = probe_82802ab, - .probe_timing = TIMING_IGNORED, /* routine don't use probe_timing (sst49lfxxxc.c) */ + .probe_timing = TIMING_IGNORED, /* routine doesn't use probe_timing (sst49lfxxxc.c) */ .block_erasers = { { @@ -6946,7 +6946,7 @@ .feature_bits = FEATURE_ADDR_SHIFTED | FEATURE_EITHER_RESET, .tested = TEST_UNTESTED, .probe = probe_m29f400bt, - .probe_timing = TIMING_IGNORED, /* routine don't use probe_timing (m29f400bt.c) */ + .probe_timing = TIMING_IGNORED, /* routine doesn't use probe_timing (m29f400bt.c) */ .block_erasers = { { @@ -7188,7 +7188,7 @@ .feature_bits = FEATURE_REGISTERMAP, .tested = TEST_UNTESTED, .probe = probe_82802ab, - .probe_timing = TIMING_IGNORED, /* routine don't use probe_timing (sst49lfxxxc.c) */ + .probe_timing = TIMING_IGNORED, /* routine doesn't use probe_timing (sst49lfxxxc.c) */ .block_erasers = { { @@ -7218,7 +7218,7 @@ .feature_bits = FEATURE_REGISTERMAP, .tested = TEST_UNTESTED, .probe = probe_82802ab, - .probe_timing = TIMING_IGNORED, /* routine don't use probe_timing (82802ab.c) */ + .probe_timing = TIMING_IGNORED, /* routine doesn't use probe_timing (82802ab.c) */ .block_erasers = { { @@ -7243,7 +7243,7 @@ .feature_bits = FEATURE_REGISTERMAP, .tested = TEST_OK_PR, .probe = probe_82802ab, - .probe_timing = TIMING_IGNORED, /* routine don't use probe_timing (82802ab.c) */ + .probe_timing = TIMING_IGNORED, /* routine doesn't use probe_timing (82802ab.c) */ .block_erasers = { { @@ -7268,7 +7268,7 @@ .feature_bits = FEATURE_REGISTERMAP, .tested = TEST_OK_PREW, .probe = probe_82802ab, - .probe_timing = TIMING_IGNORED, /* routine don't use probe_timing (82802ab.c) */ + .probe_timing = TIMING_IGNORED, /* routine doesn't use probe_timing (82802ab.c) */ .block_erasers = { { @@ -8091,7 +8091,7 @@ .feature_bits = FEATURE_LONG_RESET, .tested = TEST_OK_PRE, .probe = probe_w29ee011, - .probe_timing = TIMING_IGNORED, /* routine don't use probe_timing (w29ee011.c) */ + .probe_timing = TIMING_IGNORED, /* routine doesn't use probe_timing (w29ee011.c) */ .block_erasers = { {

1 0

[commit] r1347 - trunk
by repository service 19 Jun '11

19 Jun '11

Author: uwe Date: Sun Jun 19 19:09:49 2011 New Revision: 1347 URL: http://flashrom.org/trac/flashrom/changeset/1347 Log: Look at the return value of wait_82802ab(). Signed-off-by: Stefan Reinauer <stepan(a)coresystems.de> Acked-by: Uwe Hermann <uwe(a)hermann-uwe.de> Modified: trunk/sst49lfxxxc.c Modified: trunk/sst49lfxxxc.c ============================================================================== --- trunk/sst49lfxxxc.c Sun Jun 19 18:52:48 2011 (r1346) +++ trunk/sst49lfxxxc.c Sun Jun 19 19:09:49 2011 (r1347) @@ -68,6 +68,7 @@ chip_writeb(0xD0, bios + address); status = wait_82802ab(flash); + print_status_82802ab(status); if (check_erased_range(flash, address, sector_size)) { msg_cerr("ERASE FAILED!\n");

1 0

[commit] r1346 - trunk
by repository service 19 Jun '11

19 Jun '11

Author: uwe Date: Sun Jun 19 18:52:48 2011 New Revision: 1346 URL: http://flashrom.org/trac/flashrom/changeset/1346 Log: Add ASRock K7S41GX board-enable. Tested reading, writing and verification, all worked fine. Signed-off-by: Pawel Rozanski <rozie(a)poczta.onet.pl> Acked-by: Uwe Hermann <uwe(a)hermann-uwe.de> Modified: trunk/board_enable.c trunk/print.c Modified: trunk/board_enable.c ============================================================================== --- trunk/board_enable.c Sun Jun 19 00:56:14 2011 (r1345) +++ trunk/board_enable.c Sun Jun 19 18:52:48 2011 (r1346) @@ -391,6 +391,7 @@ * - MSI MS-6561 (745 Ultra): SiS 745 + W83697HF * - MSI MS-6787 (P4MAM-V/P4MAM-L): VIA P4M266 + VT8235 * - ASRock K7S41: SiS 741 + SiS 963 + W83697HF + * - ASRock K7S41GX: SiS 741GX + SiS 963L + W83697HF */ static int w836xx_memw_enable_2e(void) { @@ -1980,6 +1981,7 @@ {0x1022, 0x2090, 0, 0, 0x1022, 0x2080, 0, 0, NULL, "artecgroup", "dbe62", P3, "Artec Group", "DBE62", 0, OK, board_artecgroup_dbe6x}, {0x8086, 0x277c, 0xa0a0, 0x060b, 0x8086, 0x27da, 0xa0a0, 0x060b, NULL, NULL, NULL, P3, "AOpen", "i975Xa-YDG", 0, OK, board_aopen_i975xa_ydg}, {0x1039, 0x0741, 0x1849, 0x0741, 0x1039, 0x5513, 0x1849, 0x5513, "^K7S41 $", NULL, NULL, P3, "ASRock", "K7S41", 0, OK, w836xx_memw_enable_2e}, + {0x1039, 0x0741, 0x1849, 0x0741, 0x1039, 0x5513, 0x1849, 0x5513, "^K7S41GX$", NULL, NULL, P3, "ASRock", "K7S41GX", 0, OK, w836xx_memw_enable_2e}, {0x8086, 0x24D4, 0x1849, 0x24D0, 0x8086, 0x24D5, 0x1849, 0x9739, NULL, NULL, NULL, P3, "ASRock", "P4i65GV", 0, OK, intel_ich_gpio23_raise}, {0x8086, 0x2570, 0x1849, 0x2570, 0x8086, 0x24d3, 0x1849, 0x24d0, NULL, NULL, NULL, P3, "ASRock", "775i65G", 0, OK, intel_ich_gpio23_raise}, {0x1106, 0x3189, 0x1043, 0x807F, 0x1106, 0x3065, 0x1043, 0x80ED, NULL, NULL, NULL, P3, "ASUS", "A7V600-X", 0, OK, it8712f_gpio3_1_raise}, Modified: trunk/print.c ============================================================================== --- trunk/print.c Sun Jun 19 00:56:14 2011 (r1345) +++ trunk/print.c Sun Jun 19 18:52:48 2011 (r1346) @@ -400,6 +400,7 @@ B("ASRock", "A770CrossFire", 1, "http://www.asrock.com/mb/overview.asp?Model=A770CrossFire&s=AM2%%2b", NULL), B("ASRock", "ALiveNF6G-DVI", 1, "http://www.asrock.com/mb/overview.asp?Model=ALiveNF6G-DVI", NULL), B("ASRock", "K7S41", 1, "http://www.asrock.com/mb/overview.asp?Model=K7S41", NULL), + B("ASRock", "K7S41GX", 1, "http://www.asrock.com/mb/overview.asp?Model=K7S41GX", NULL), B("ASRock", "K7VT4A+", 0, "http://www.asrock.com/mb/overview.asp?Model=K7VT4A%%2b&s=", "No chip found, probably due to flash translation. http://www.flashrom.org/pipermail/flashrom/2009-August/000393.html"), B("ASRock", "K8S8X", 1, "http://www.asrock.com/mb/overview.asp?Model=K8S8X", NULL), B("ASRock", "M3A790GXH/128M", 1, "http://www.asrock.com/MB/overview.asp?Model=M3A790GXH/128M", NULL),

1 0

Success flashing Supermicro X7SPA-HF
by Jochen Schulz 19 Jun '11

19 Jun '11

Hi, I just wanted to say thanks and report that I just successfully flashed the BIOS of my brand-new mainboard Supermicro X7SPA-HF¹ using flashrom. After wasting a whole evening trying to make a 4MB BIOS image fit onto a (virtual) floppy, I stumbled upon flashrom again and, without much thought, decided to give it a try. I tried reading the current BIOS first and after that worked I flashed the file X7SPA0.526 from the current zip download. I ignored the message that erasing is untested and another one that suggested that a single block or something like that couldn't be eraed. After five minutes of waiting I became a little bit nervous, but two or three minutes later flashrom was finished and I could reboot successfully. So, thanks again, flashrom saved my day. If you need any further information for your documentation, please Cc me as I am not subscribed. J. ¹ http://www.supermicro.com/products/motherboard/ATOM/ICH9/X7SPA.cfm?typ=H&IP… -- When I am doing sex I wonder if my emotions can be detected by alien civilisations. [Agree] [Disagree] <http://www.slowlydownward.com/NODATA/data_enter2.html>

2 1

Write on an ASUS M4A78-EM
by Jani Uusitalo 19 Jun '11

19 Jun '11

Hi list. Just flashed my ASUS M4A78-EM using flashrom (Ubuntu packed version 0.9.1+r946-1ubuntu1, with latest rev. 2101 ROM from ASUS), and everything went fine. Just thought I'd send this note since the motherboard isn't listed in the wiki yet. Reading the old image from chip also worked fine. -- Jani

2 1

"ST M25P80" (1024 KB, SPI) - Tested - WORKS
by Harald Gutmann 19 Jun '11

19 Jun '11

hargut@benchvice:~/flashrom$ sudo ./flashrom -w ../coreboot.svn/build/coreboot.rom flashrom v0.9.3-r1223 on Linux 2.6.32-5-amd64 (x86_64), built with libpci 3.1.7, GCC 4.4.5 20100913 (prerelease), little endian flashrom is free software, get the source code at http://www.flashrom.org Calibrating delay loop... OK. coreboot table found at 0x7fffe000. Found ITE Super I/O, ID 0x8716. Found chipset "NVIDIA MCP55", enabling flash write... OK. This chipset supports the following protocols: Non-SPI. 4 byte RDID not supported on this SPI controller 4 byte RDID not supported on this SPI controller 4 byte RDID not supported on this SPI controller 4 byte RDID not supported on this SPI controller 4 byte RDID not supported on this SPI controller 4 byte RDID not supported on this SPI controller 4 byte RDID not supported on this SPI controller 4 byte RDID not supported on this SPI controller 4 byte RDID not supported on this SPI controller 4 byte RDID not supported on this SPI controller 4 byte RDID not supported on this SPI controller Found chip "ST M25P80" (1024 KB, SPI) at physical address 0xfff00000. 4 byte RDID not supported on this SPI controller === This flash part has status UNTESTED for operations: ERASE WRITE The test status of this chip may have been updated in the latest development version of flashrom. If you are running the latest development version, please email a report to flashrom(a)flashrom.org if any of the above operations work correctly for you with this flash part. Please include the flashrom output with the additional -V option for all operations you tested (-V, -Vr, -Vw, -VE), and mention which mainboard or programmer you tested. Please mention your board in the subject line. Thanks for your help! Erasing flash chip... SUCCESS. Writing flash chip... COMPLETE. Verifying flash... VERIFIED. hargut@benchvice:~/flashrom$

2 1

GA-6VXE7
by Justin Doiel 19 Jun '11

19 Jun '11

The attached is the output of flashrom -EV on the gigabyte GA-6VXE7. Erase worked. we verified all FFs, and wrote the contents back successfully. Juston Doiel

2 1

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

flashrom