Attention is currently required from: Simon Buhrow, Nico Huber, Angel Pons. Hello build bot (Jenkins), Nico Huber,
I'd like you to reexamine a change. Please visit
https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/58467
to look at the new patch set (#4).
Change subject: flashchips.c: big erase blocksize first ......................................................................
flashchips.c: big erase blocksize first
Choosing the best fitting erase block size can safe a significant amount of runtime. Changing the order of entries of block_erasers in flashchips.c going from the bigger block size to lower block size does a better job.
I am running flashrom inside a VirtualBox so the gained time is quite big.
Setup: IS25LP064 flash + ft2232H programmer Saved time: > 2 min for single '-E' operation
Change-Id: I862ce0b5f8912565e43c340578d8126aa2e6aa3b Signed-off-by: Simon Buhrow simon.buhrow@posteo.de --- M flashrom.c 1 file changed, 67 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
git pull ssh://review.coreboot.org:29418/flashrom refs/changes/67/58467/4