[M] Change in flashrom[1.3.x]: ichspi: Fix number of bytes for HW seq operations

[Felix Singer (Code Review)]

Felix Singer has submitted this change. ( https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/70039 )

(

1 is the latest approved patch-set.
No files were changed between the latest approved patch-set and the submitted one.
 )Change subject: ichspi: Fix number of bytes for HW seq operations
......................................................................

ichspi: Fix number of bytes for HW seq operations

This patch fixes a potential issue where the SPI controller register
HSFC.FDBC (bits 24-29) value gets incorrectly calculated while passing
the `len` as `0` instead of `1`.

As per Intel EDS, `0b` in the FDBC represents 1 byte while `0x3f`
represents 64-bytes to be transferred. The number of bytes
transferred is the value of this field plus 1.

If we would like to transfer 1 byte then we need to set `0b` in
FDBC for operations like read, write, flash id as to account for
the `set byte count` hence, the `len` argument should be `1`.

Additionally, as per EDS, the FDBC field is ignored for any block
erase command.

BUG=b:258280679
TEST=Able to build flashrom and perform below operations on Google,
Rex and Google, Kano/Taeko.

During `--wp-disable` HW seq operation that requires 1 byte data
transfer.

HSFC.FDBC value while passing `len` as `0` = 0x3f (represents 64-byte)

HSFC.FDBC value while passing `len` as `1` = 0x0 (represents 1-byte)

Original-Signed-off-by: Subrata Banik 
Original-Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/69789
Original-Reviewed-by: Angel Pons 
Original-Reviewed-by: Edward O'Callaghan 
Original-Reviewed-by: Nikolai Artemiev 
Original-Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)

Change-Id: I5b911655649c693e576497520687d7810bbd3c54
Signed-off-by: Felix Singer 
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/70039
Reviewed-by: Anastasia Klimchuk 
Reviewed-by: Edward O'Callaghan 
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) 
---
M ichspi.c
1 file changed, 56 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

Approvals:
  build bot (Jenkins): Verified
  Edward O'Callaghan: Looks good to me, approved
  Anastasia Klimchuk: Looks good to me, but someone else must approve

diff --git a/ichspi.c b/ichspi.c
index 29dcd25..dd5a2c1 100644
--- a/ichspi.c
+++ b/ichspi.c
@@ -1360,6 +1360,12 @@

/* Set up transaction parameters. */
    hsfc |= hsfc_cycle;
+	/*
+	 * The number of bytes transferred is the value of `FDBC` plus 1, hence,
+	 * subtracted 1 from the length field.
+	 * As per Intel EDS, `0b` in the FDBC represents 1 byte while `0x3f`
+	 * represents 64-bytes to be transferred.
+	 */
    hsfc |= HSFC_FDBC_VAL(len - 1);
    hsfc |= HSFC_FGO; /* start */
    prettyprint_ich9_reg_hsfc(hsfc, ich_generation);
@@ -1399,7 +1405,7 @@
    }
    msg_pdbg("Reading Status register\n");

-	if (ich_exec_sync_hwseq_xfer(flash, HSFC_CYCLE_RD_STATUS, 0, len, ich_generation,
+	if (ich_exec_sync_hwseq_xfer(flash, HSFC_CYCLE_RD_STATUS, 1, len, ich_generation,
    	hwseq_data->addr_mask)) {
    	msg_perr("Reading Status register failed\n!!");
    	return -1;
@@ -1422,7 +1428,7 @@

ich_fill_data(&value, len, ICH9_REG_FDATA0);

-	if (ich_exec_sync_hwseq_xfer(flash, HSFC_CYCLE_WR_STATUS, 0, len, ich_generation,
+	if (ich_exec_sync_hwseq_xfer(flash, HSFC_CYCLE_WR_STATUS, 1, len, ich_generation,
    	hwseq_data->addr_mask)) {
    	msg_perr("Writing Status register failed\n!!");
    	return -1;
@@ -1518,7 +1524,7 @@

msg_pdbg("Erasing %d bytes starting at 0x%06x.\n", len, addr);

-	if (ich_exec_sync_hwseq_xfer(flash, HSFC_CYCLE_BLOCK_ERASE, addr, 0, ich_generation,
+	if (ich_exec_sync_hwseq_xfer(flash, HSFC_CYCLE_BLOCK_ERASE, addr, 1, ich_generation,
    	hwseq_data->addr_mask))
    	return -1;
    return 0;