Change in flashrom[master]: tests: Add run_probe_lifecycle and add dummyflasher probe test

[Anastasia Klimchuk (Code Review)]

Attention is currently required from: Nico Huber, Edward O'Callaghan, Angel Pons.
Anastasia Klimchuk has posted comments on this change. ( https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/59741 )

Change subject: tests: Add run_probe_lifecycle and add dummyflasher probe test
......................................................................

Patch Set 2:

(2 comments)

File tests/lifecycle.c:

https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/59741/comment/2787629a_9b69cc73 
PS1, Line 53: 	printf("Testing flashrom_flash_probe for programmer=%s, chip=%s ... \n", prog->name, chip_name);
            : 	assert_int_equal(0, flashrom_flash_probe(&flashctx, flashprog, chip_name));
            : 	printf("... flashrom_flash_probe for programmer=%s successful\n", prog->name);
> technically this block is the real meaning of the test and the rest is mostly almost exact the same  […]

I like your idea! Please have a look at my attempt to implement it :)

https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/59741/comment/7b48667b_47c3e9b1 
PS1, Line 68:  "bus=spi,emulate=W25Q128FV", "W25Q128.V"
> this is changing the behavior of the test in a rename commit.

This is not a rename commit, but you are right, behavior is changing because it's a different test now (it's a new probe test). However on the second thought I realised there is no reason to delete existing test, so I returned it back. Now dummy is officially The Most Tested Programmer!
Given that programmer params differ, two dummy tests are not a duplication. So all good (I think).