[M] Change in flashrom[master]: flashchips: Add support for GigaDevice GD25LR256E, GD251R512ME

Attention is currently required from: Anastasia Klimchuk, Angel Pons, Martin Roth, Raj Astekar, Ravishankar Sarawadi, Wonkyu Kim. Martin L Roth has posted comments on this change. ( https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/58025?usp=email ) Change subject: flashchips: Add support for GigaDevice GD25LR256E, GD251R512ME ...................................................................... Patch Set 7: (2 comments) Commit Message: https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/58025/comment/0b7000b9_0f03f689 : PS6, Line 11: https://www.gigadevice.com/datasheet/gd25lr512me/
The links are not working anymore. […] Updated to archive.org links
https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/58025/comment/60856779_26ce3c5c : PS6, Line 17: sudo dut-control cold_reset:on fw_wp_en:off spi2_buf_en:on spi2_buf_on_flex_en:on spi2_vref:pp1800 spi_hold:off : sudo flashrom -V -p raiden_debug_spi -w <test_binary> : sudo dut-control spi2_buf_en:off spi2_buf_on_flex_en:off spi2_vref:off spi_hold:off cold_reset:off
These are probably the commands used by original patch author (which is all good). […] I only have access to the gd25lr512me chip and flashed with a dediprog. I added my command and got rid of all the unnecessary parts of the original commands.
For flash chips though, I wouldn't think the command line used would matter very much. Does which programmer is used actually matter? I did actually test reading and erasing form the gd25lr512me chip in addition to just writing though. I did not test any locking functionality however. Should we add an L to PREW for testing to show that the locking functionality has been verified? -- To view, visit https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/58025?usp=email To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit https://review.coreboot.org/settings Gerrit-Project: flashrom Gerrit-Branch: master Gerrit-Change-Id: I2fe6bc1219cd1ee19b93caabab69de938cfc44b0 Gerrit-Change-Number: 58025 Gerrit-PatchSet: 7 Gerrit-Owner: Ravishankar Sarawadi <ravishankar.sarawadi@intel.com> Gerrit-Reviewer: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com> Gerrit-Reviewer: Martin L Roth <gaumless@gmail.com> Gerrit-Reviewer: Raj Astekar <raj.astekar@intel.com> Gerrit-Reviewer: Sukumar Ghorai <sukumar.ghorai@intel.com> Gerrit-Reviewer: Wonkyu Kim <wonkyu.kim@intel.com> Gerrit-Reviewer: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org> Gerrit-CC: Anastasia Klimchuk <aklm@chromium.org> Gerrit-CC: Martin Roth <martin.roth@amd.corp-partner.google.com> Gerrit-CC: Ravishankar Sarawadi <ravishankar.sarawadi@intel.corp-partner.google.com> Gerrit-CC: Thomas Heijligen <src@posteo.de> Gerrit-Attention: Wonkyu Kim <wonkyu.kim@intel.com> Gerrit-Attention: Ravishankar Sarawadi <ravishankar.sarawadi@intel.com> Gerrit-Attention: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com> Gerrit-Attention: Anastasia Klimchuk <aklm@chromium.org> Gerrit-Attention: Martin Roth <martin.roth@amd.corp-partner.google.com> Gerrit-Attention: Raj Astekar <raj.astekar@intel.com> Gerrit-Comment-Date: Fri, 30 Jun 2023 23:47:40 +0000 Gerrit-HasComments: Yes Gerrit-Has-Labels: No Comment-In-Reply-To: Anastasia Klimchuk <aklm@chromium.org> Gerrit-MessageType: comment
participants (1)
-
Martin L Roth (Code Review)