Peter Marheine has uploaded this change for review. ( https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/73571 )
Change subject: fmap: ignore areas with zero size ......................................................................
fmap: ignore areas with zero size
It's impossible for flashrom_layout to represent zero-sized flash regions but it is possible for a fmap to contain a zero-sized region which causes the resulting layout to fail layout_sanity_checks(), preventing use of that fmap.
Because it would very rarely make sense to be able to operate on zero-sized regions anyway and changing layouts to be able to support zero-size regions would entail large changes, instead ignore zero-size regions when present in fmap.
TEST=Warning is now printed when using fmap that contains a zero-sized area, and operations on other regions are allowed to proceed. BUG=b:271933192
Change-Id: Ie20971f779acece7a0b3b8f38796fff128ce689a Signed-off-by: Peter Marheine pmarheine@chromium.org --- M libflashrom.c 1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
git pull ssh://review.coreboot.org:29418/flashrom refs/changes/71/73571/1
diff --git a/libflashrom.c b/libflashrom.c index 2e89fe5..4a59e2a 100644 --- a/libflashrom.c +++ b/libflashrom.c @@ -362,6 +362,16 @@ return 1;
for (i = 0, area = fmap->areas; i < fmap->nareas; i++, area++) { + if (area->size == 0) { + /* Layout regions use inclusive upper and lower bounds, + * so it's impossible to represent a region with zero + * size although it's allowed in fmap. */ + msg_gwarn("Ignoring zero-size fmap region "%s";" + " empty regions are unsupported.\n", + area->name); + continue; + } + snprintf(name, sizeof(name), "%s", area->name); if (flashrom_layout_add_region(l, area->offset, area->offset + area->size - 1, name)) { flashrom_layout_release(l);