Hello Patrick Rudolph, Paul Menzel, Jonathan Neuschäfer, Philipp Deppenwiese, build bot (Jenkins), Nico Huber, Brian Norris,
I'd like you to reexamine a change. Please visit
https://review.coreboot.org/25706
to look at the new patch set (#7).
Change subject: linux_mtd: Initial import ......................................................................
linux_mtd: Initial import
This imports a series of patches from chromiumos for MTD support. The patches are squashed to ease review and original Change-Ids have been removed to avoid confusing Gerrit.
There are a few changes to integrate the code: - Conflict resolution - Makefile changes - Remove file library usage from linux_mtd. We may revisit this and use it for other Linux interfaces later on.
This consolidated patch is Signed-off-by: David Hendricks dhendricks@fb.com
The first commit's message is: Initial MTD support
This adds MTD support to flashrom so that we can read, erase, and write content on a NOR flash chip via MTD.
BUG=chrome-os-partner:40208 BRANCH=none TEST=read, write, and erase works on Oak
Signed-off-by: David Hendricks dhendrix@chromium.org Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/272983 Reviewed-by: Shawn N shawnn@chromium.org
This is the 2nd commit message:
linux_mtd: Fix compilation errors
This fixes compilation errors from the initial import patch.
Signed-off-by: David Hendricks dhendricks@fb.com
This is the 3rd commit message:
linux_mtd: Suppress message if NOR device not found
This just suppresses a message that might cause confusion for unsuspecting users.
BUG=none BRANCH=none TEST=ran on veyron_mickey, "NOR type device not found" message no longer appears under normal circumstances. Signed-off-by: David Hendricks dhendrix@chromium.org
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/302145 Commit-Ready: David Hendricks dhendrix@chromium.org Tested-by: David Hendricks dhendrix@chromium.org Reviewed-by: Shawn N shawnn@chromium.org
This is the 4th commit message:
linux_mtd: Support for NO_ERASE type devices
Some mtd devices have the MTD_NO_ERASE flag set. This means these devices don't require an erase to write and might not have implemented an erase function. We should be conservative and skip erasing altogether, falling back to performing writes over the whole flash.
BUG=b:35104688 TESTED=Zaius flash is now written correctly for the 0xff regions.
Signed-off-by: William A. Kennington III wak@google.com Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/472128 Commit-Ready: William Kennington wak@google.com Tested-by: William Kennington wak@google.com Reviewed-by: Brian Norris briannorris@chromium.org
This is the 5th commit message:
linux_mtd: do reads in eraseblock-sized chunks
It's probably not the best idea to try to do an 8MB read in one syscall. Theoretically, this should work; but MTD just relies on the SPI driver to deliver the whole read in one transfer, and many SPI drivers haven't been tested well with large transfer sizes.
I'd consider this a workaround, but it's still good to have IMO.
BUG=chrome-os-partner:53215 TEST=boot kevin; `flashrom --read ...` TEST=check for performance regression on oak BRANCH=none
Signed-off-by: Brian Norris briannorris@chromium.org Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/344006 Reviewed-by: David Hendricks dhendrix@chromium.org
This is the 6th commit message:
linux_mtd: make read/write loop chunks consistent, and documented
Theoretically, there should be no maximum size for the read() and write() syscalls on an MTD (well, except for the size of the entire device). But practical concerns (i.e., bugs) have meant we don't quite do this.
For reads: Bug https://b/35573113 shows that some SPI-based MTD drivers don't yet handle very large transactions. So we artificially limit this to block-sized chunks.
For writes: It's not clear there is a hard limit. Some drivers will already split large writes into smaller chunks automatically. Others don't do any splitting. At any rate, using *small* chunks can actually be a problem for some devices (b:35104688), as they get worse performance (doing an internal read/modify/write). This could be fixed in other ways by advertizing their true "write chunk size" to user space somehow, but this isn't so easy.
As a simpler fix, we can just increase the loop increment to match the read loop. Per David, the original implementation (looping over page chunks) was just being paranoid.
So this patch: * clarifies comments in linux_mtd_read(), to note that the chunking is somewhat of a hack that ideally can be fixed (with bug reference) * simplifies the linux_mtd_write() looping to match the structure in linux_mtd_read(), including dropping several unnecessary seeks, and correcting the error messages (they referred to "reads" and had the wrong parameters) * change linux_mtd_write() to align its chunks to eraseblocks, not page sizes
Note that the "->page_size" parameter is still somewhat ill-defined, and only set by the upper layers for "opaque" flash. And it's not actually used in this driver now. If we could figure out what we really want to use it for, then we could try to set it appropriately.
BRANCH=none BUG=b:35104688 TEST=various flashrom tests on Kevin TEST=Reading and writing to flash works on our zaius machines over mtd
Change-Id: I3d6bb282863a5cf69909e28a1fc752b35f1b9599 Signed-off-by: Brian Norris briannorris@chromium.org Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/505409 Reviewed-by: David Hendricks dhendrix@chromium.org Reviewed-by: Martin Roth martinroth@chromium.org Reviewed-by: William Kennington wak@google.com --- M Makefile M flash.h M flashrom.8.tmpl M flashrom.c M internal.c A linux_mtd.c M programmer.h 7 files changed, 479 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
git pull ssh://review.coreboot.org:29418/flashrom refs/changes/06/25706/7